There are 80 users in the forums
Originally posted by ninertico:
Oh, I hear ya man!
Still, take a look at my mock...
#3 Tannehill
#4 Richardson--They have Thomas
#5 Claiborne--They really, really need a CB more so than replacing their LOT.
#6 Cox--They have Kalil, Blackmon AND Cox to choose from. WRs deep class and they have two OTs worthy of starting position. If any team, it would be StL.
#7 Blackmon--They have a LOT already and NO #1 WRs for Gabbert.
And whala!!! We're at #8 with the Vikes on the clock...hmmmm, sure looks like a possibility rather than a certain million nevers.
Hey! And thanks to all for the comments. I really am sticking with Tannehill at #3 doe...That's OTC slappin upside my head. lol
Originally posted by JeuSF49:
Tannehill at 3 would be a HUGE reach, a bigger reach than Heward-Bey and Crabtree...
IMHO Tannehill has potential but needs to sit for a yer or two.
Originally posted by Young2Rice:
Sup Tico.
Man Aldon Smith got you a lot of head last year huh lol

Very good times, indeed! Looking to him breakin' that record. 
Originally posted by stefano89:
why wudnt fleenr be a great pick.you should all know by know in harbaughs offense TEs are pretty much WRs. fleener is 6'6 it s a no brainer. if we picked him wed be picking a WR an TE in the same pick an a great one. you see what tom bradys doin with gronkowski? imagine that on our team cuz that cud be fleener in SF
Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Niners will trade everyone on defense to the Colts and grab Andrew Luck.....