There are 259 users in the forums
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
The BPA and an OT.
do you include QB in that BPA?
No QB. Either CJ Spiller or a RT for me.
that doesnt exactly entail BPA does it?
Well, it's never absolute. Kickers, for example, unless you are the Raiders. And I can't see us taking a tight end.
Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
The BPA and an OT.
do you include QB in that BPA?
No QB. Either CJ Spiller or a RT for me.
that doesnt exactly entail BPA does it?
Well, it's never absolute. Kickers, for example, unless you are the Raiders. And I can't see us taking a tight end.
The difference is we actually have a proven TE.
Originally posted by English:Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
The BPA and an OT.
do you include QB in that BPA?
No QB. Either CJ Spiller or a RT for me.
that doesnt exactly entail BPA does it?
Well, it's never absolute. Kickers, for example, unless you are the Raiders. And I can't see us taking a tight end.
The difference is we actually have a proven TE.
's wot I mean!
Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
The BPA and an OT.
do you include QB in that BPA?
No QB. Either CJ Spiller or a RT for me.
that doesnt exactly entail BPA does it?
Well, it's never absolute. Kickers, for example, unless you are the Raiders. And I can't see us taking a tight end.
The difference is we actually have a proven TE.
's wot I mean!
well QB should still be part of the BPA imo
Originally posted by King49er:Originally posted by teeohh:
bpa not a receiver or tight end or mlb
Originally posted by DaveWilcox:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by tjd808185:Originally posted by English:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by IdentityCrisis:Originally posted by MadDog49er:
The BPA and an OT.
do you include QB in that BPA?
No QB. Either CJ Spiller or a RT for me.
that doesnt exactly entail BPA does it?
Well, it's never absolute. Kickers, for example, unless you are the Raiders. And I can't see us taking a tight end.
The difference is we actually have a proven TE.
's wot I mean!
well QB should still be part of the BPA imo
There won't be a QB on the board when we pick somewhere between 12-20 that would be considered the BPA.
Originally posted by tohara3:Originally posted by KRS-1:
..the BPA off the board. You play the draft board and the phones to your advantage. You don't decide that in X round you will select X position, you don't reach unless the player that is deemed a reach grades out higher on your board than any of the fans or experts. It's fine to hope we can fill needs like the OL in round 1 but that will all depend on how things shake out and there is no guarantee that it will work to our favor.
Agree with BPA on our board at the time.