Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Is it really going all in for Wilson?
besides this season, I believe Wilson secures our offense for the future as well
He'll probably be two 1st. Thats going all in to me
There are 1,099 users in the forums
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Is it really going all in for Wilson?
besides this season, I believe Wilson secures our offense for the future as well
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by ritz126:
LOL
but seriously i think people always complain no matter what. KS is an aggressive coach its hard to blame him for that especially in the SB rather than running the clock especially when it worked previous in that game. I see a lot of the losses as execution issues and i always though its ridiculous to blame the offense for giving up a 28-3 lead the fall shouldve been way more on Dan Quinn than KS.
I feel people want it both ways. I have seen people like DrEli complain when play calling gets conservative then also complain when it stays aggressive and it doesnt work out. You cant have it both ways
Isnt that what good play callers are suppose to do? Call the right play at the right time.
Yup all the good play callers always call the right play.
Originally posted by lamontb:
2 1st's for Wilson is.overboard
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Looking at their stats this season, Buck is playing better than Simmons. Buck is the better pass rusher, Simmons is better against the run. I wouldn't ever want to trade multiple firsts for a defensive tackle.
Simmons is the best DT in the NFL don't get it twisted. Buck is the better value but Simmons is a problem.
Yeah, I dunno. Reminds me of the Haynesworth trade and we all know how that turned out....
Haynesworth trade? You mean signing. Looking at Simmons he doesn't seem the type to get fat and lazy. Dudes the modern era John Randle.
Yeah signing, my bad. Just feel like he's that overrated. May be good, but definitely not 2 first rounders good....
He's not overrated. He's been underrated most his career.
Well, his stats are nearly identical to Buck's this season. Career average 5.8 sacks/year. Buck career 6.8 sacks/year. One went for 2 firsts, the other for 1 fourth. So Buck is REALLY UNDERRATED...
Quit judging players by box scores it's really not a good measure for how good a player is.
Niner Talk » DeForest Buckner Traded to the Colts, and back!
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Simmons contract extension (3 years at over $105 million)pays him an average of $35 million plus a year on top of those multiple first round picks. Chicago payed a ton to get a guy who is going to still cost a ton.
Because the Titans just extended Jeffery Simmons, and the bonus money is paid, a team-friendly deal goes with him to Chicago ...
— Albert Breer (@AlbertBreer) October 29, 2026
• $7.94 million for the rest of 2026.
• $26.95 million in cash for 2027.
• Signed through 2030 for a total $124.7 million.
Niner Talk » DeForest Buckner Traded to the Colts, and back!
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by Memphis9er:
Looking at their stats this season, Buck is playing better than Simmons. Buck is the better pass rusher, Simmons is better against the run. I wouldn't ever want to trade multiple firsts for a defensive tackle.
Simmons is the best DT in the NFL don't get it twisted. Buck is the better value but Simmons is a problem.
Yeah, I dunno. Reminds me of the Haynesworth trade and we all know how that turned out....
Haynesworth trade? You mean signing. Looking at Simmons he doesn't seem the type to get fat and lazy. Dudes the modern era John Randle.
Yeah signing, my bad. Just feel like he's that overrated. May be good, but definitely not 2 first rounders good....
He's not overrated. He's been underrated most his career.
Well, his stats are nearly identical to Buck's this season. Career average 5.8 sacks/year. Buck career 6.8 sacks/year. One went for 2 firsts, the other for 1 fourth. So Buck is REALLY UNDERRATED...
Quit judging players by box scores it's really not a good measure for how good a player is.
Niner Talk » DeForest Buckner Traded to the Colts, and back!
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by ritz126:
LOL
but seriously i think people always complain no matter what. KS is an aggressive coach its hard to blame him for that especially in the SB rather than running the clock especially when it worked previous in that game. I see a lot of the losses as execution issues and i always though its ridiculous to blame the offense for giving up a 28-3 lead the fall shouldve been way more on Dan Quinn than KS.
I feel people want it both ways. I have seen people like DrEli complain when play calling gets conservative then also complain when it stays aggressive and it doesnt work out. You cant have it both ways
Isnt that what good play callers are suppose to do? Call the right play at the right time.
Originally posted by Tigerlaw:
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by jed_X:
Originally posted by OnTheClock:
Doesn't seem like much chance for Wilson.
Maybe Downs, Jennings but still don't think we look at receiver.
Pass rush, I'd be curious if we make a play for Chaisson or Diaby.
It'd be idiotic to not add wr. If john lynch is relying on Mike Evans achilles to hold up for the next 10 games and then playoffs?
Good luck.
Ill take Downs personally. Wilson is a pipe dream and I think Downs best football is in front of him, and hes been pretty decent so far.
Wilson is exactly like Jeffrey Simmons
Everything has a price
I'll keep repeating it...I think Wilson is the rare target worth (2) first rounders due to our specific team needs
Originally posted by 49erF90:
Going back to the main subject here, I find the Seahawks somehow inconsistent this year, in my opinion. The chiefs found themselves trapped during that last game and being 6-0, they were due for their first loss ( they probably going to start losing more games with the way Mahomes played but that's just my 2 cents). Next Seahawks game is against the Bears and like I said, there's a good chance they lose this game because of their inconsistency particularly their 1 dimensional offense.
Originally posted by Cosmo:LaDainian Tomlinson was that caliber too.
Marshall Faulk was no slouch in the receiving game, I'd put them both on about the same level. But I'd also have Roger Craig right there with both.
Originally posted by Silky:
I wonder if Jets fans are for or against trading Wilson