There are 177 users in the forums
All TIME MLB Draft: BirdmanJr is UP. Fincham11 is ON DECK
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:26 PM
- SLICK
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,197
Hold on. I thought ATG would make my decision for me.
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM
- SLICK
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,197
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM
- AllTimeGreat
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,094
Originally posted by SLICK:
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......
just curious, who was your other choice?
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:35 PM
- LA9erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,021
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:Originally posted by SLICK:
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......
just curious, who was your other choice?
Alex Rodriguez.
Varitek is a stretch here IMO, but do what you gotta do, SLICK.
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:39 PM
- SLICK
- Veteran
- Posts: 11,197
Originally posted by LA9erFan:Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:Originally posted by SLICK:
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......
just curious, who was your other choice?
Alex Rodriguez.
Varitek is a stretch here IMO, but do what you gotta do, SLICK.
LOL. I don't wanna drop names. Ill send a PM, even tho he should be gone real soon.
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:40 PM
- Jordache49
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,506
With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..
Hammering Hank Aaron
Hammering Hank Aaron
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM
- itlynstalyn
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,520
Originally posted by Jordache49:
With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..
Hammering Hank Aaron
It's about damn time.
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:44 PM
- YourHuckleberry
- Member
- Posts: 5,107
crzy on the clock!!
Apr 8, 2010 at 4:53 PM
- Jordache49
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,506
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:Originally posted by Jordache49:
With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..
Hammering Hank Aaron
It's about damn time.
I thought he'd be gone in the top 5 picks. Surprised he fell out of top 10
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM
- dman
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,453
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:02 PM
- Hollywood49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,287
Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:08 PM
- SacRock14
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,746
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??
I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.
The hitting is more balanced.
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:11 PM
- LA9erFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 66,021
Originally posted by SacRock14:Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??
I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.
The hitting is more balanced.
Yeah, all of the top pitchers are from 1880-1900.
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:11 PM
- Hollywood49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,287
Originally posted by SacRock14:Originally posted by Hollywood49er:Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?
Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?
Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??
I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.
The hitting is more balanced.
Apr 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM
- crzy
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 40,285