All TIME MLB Draft: BirdmanJr is UP. Fincham11 is ON DECK | Page 16

Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by SLICK:
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......

just curious, who was your other choice?

Alex Rodriguez.

Varitek is a stretch here IMO, but do what you gotta do, SLICK.

Apr 8, 2010 at 4:39 PM

#230

SLICK
Veteran
Posts: 11,197

Originally posted by LA9erFan:
Originally posted by AllTimeGreat:
Originally posted by SLICK:
I started with about 5 guys, and ended with 2. Tough call, but I gotta go with.......

just curious, who was your other choice?

Alex Rodriguez.

Varitek is a stretch here IMO, but do what you gotta do, SLICK.

LOL. I don't wanna drop names. Ill send a PM, even tho he should be gone real soon.

Apr 8, 2010 at 4:40 PM

#231

Jordache49
Veteran
Posts: 4,506

With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..

Hammering Hank Aaron

Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM

#232

itlynstalyn
Veteran
Posts: 38,520

Originally posted by Jordache49:
With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..

Hammering Hank Aaron

It's about damn time.

Apr 8, 2010 at 4:44 PM

#233

YourHuckleberry
Member
Posts: 5,107

crzy on the clock!!

Apr 8, 2010 at 4:53 PM

#234

Jordache49
Veteran
Posts: 4,506

Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by Jordache49:
With my pick, im going with the * free HR champ..

Hammering Hank Aaron

It's about damn time.

I thought he'd be gone in the top 5 picks. Surprised he fell out of top 10

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:00 PM

#235

dman
Veteran
Posts: 7,453

Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?

Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:02 PM

#236

Hollywood49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,287

Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?

Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?

Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:08 PM

#237

SacRock14
Veteran
Posts: 5,746

Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?

Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?

Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??

I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.

The hitting is more balanced.

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:11 PM

#238

LA9erFan
Veteran
Posts: 66,021

Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?

Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?

Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??

I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.

The hitting is more balanced.

Yeah, all of the top pitchers are from 1880-1900.

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:11 PM

#239

Hollywood49er
Veteran
Posts: 5,287

Originally posted by SacRock14:
Originally posted by Hollywood49er:
Originally posted by dman:
Any idea how the sim looks at different eras?

Is a guy from the 19th century going to have his stats looked at differently?

Thats exactly what I was about to ask....anybody know the answer??

I was going to keep this under wraps, but if you take a look at some of the WhatIf ratings, I think the pitching is completely out of whack. Guys from way back with their insane statistics are valued much higher than pitching stars of our era.

The hitting is more balanced.

Apr 8, 2010 at 5:28 PM

#240

crzy
Hall of Fame
Posts: 40,285