There are 451 users in the forums

49ers 2026 Salary Cap Thread, 2026 Cap Room=$46,322,300 as of 1/26/26 on a $305M cap

Shop Find 49ers gear online
^ I did it for you.

Player - Total Snaps - Snaps AVG Per Game - % of Total Snaps - Total Contract
Jimmy Garoppolo - 1,964 - 46 - 68% - $59,800,000
Dee Ford - 482 - 11 - 18% - $26,939,294
Arik Armstead - 2,068 - 48 - 75% - $21,273,941
Nick Bosa - 1,399 - 33 - 51% - $18,443,518
Kyle Juszczyk - 1,275 - 30 - 44% - $13,775,736
Jimmie Ward - 2,301 - 54 - 84% - $10,307,133
Jaquiski Tartt - 1,600 - 37 - 58% - $11,618,750
George Kittle - 1,742 - 41 - 60% - $9,252,148
Raheem Mostert - 716 - 17 - 25% - $7,120,833
Jason Verrett - 866 - 20 - 31% - $5,582,353
K'Waun Williams - 1,305 - 30 - 47% - $6,316,875
Javon Kinlaw - 695 - 29 - 45% - $4,576,207
Fred Warner - 2,680 - 62 - 97% - $3,830,505
Deebo Samuel - 1,614 - 38 - 56% - $4,198,558
Brandon Aiyuk - 1,093 - 46 - 68% - $3,702,444
D.J. Jones - 1,008 - 23 - 37% - $3,271,875
Emmanuel Moseley - 1,646 - 38 - 60% - $2,496,000
Jeff Wilson - 376 - 9 - 13% - $2,311,471
Samson Ebukam - 229 - 29 - 45% - $1,860,294

Here are the top 20 most expensive players over the past 2.5 years NOT including the offensive line. The site I use doesn't track offensive linemen and their snap counts. But no doubt, it follows this same exact pattern as well given this is a team philosophy. I also didn't count ex-49ers like Buckner or Sherman; just those on the roster today.

Since 2019 (43 games), this FO has spent $216,677,932 for their top 20 most expensive players (non-OL) who are playing only 52% of the total possible snaps per game.

That's only 3 players (bolded) earning their money by staying on the field. As to their level of play commensurate their contracts? That's debatable.

This is a very poor return on investment esp. when you consider the positional value of many of these (i.e. QB, ER, WR, 3T, CB1, LB, FB, etc.).

So I go back to my original take: This FO not only invests poorly in injured players but counts on them and pays them well. This is the real reason we're constantly up against the cap. Poor original investments and then the added costs to put out the inevitable fires when they all drop like flies and are only available for 52% of the snaps.
[ Edited by NCommand on Nov 14, 2021 at 11:39 AM ]
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by NCommand:
^ I did it for you.

Player - Total Snaps - Snaps AVG Per Game - % of Total Snaps - Total Contract
Jimmy Garoppolo - 1,964 - 46 - 68% - $59,800,000
Dee Ford - 482 - 11 - 18% - $26,939,294
Arik Armstead - 2,068 - 48 - 75% - $21,273,941
Nick Bosa - 1,399 - 33 - 51% - $18,443,518
Kyle Juszczyk - 1,275 - 30 - 44% - $13,775,736
Jimmie Ward - 2,301 - 54 - 84% - $10,307,133
Jaquiski Tartt - 1,600 - 37 - 58% - $11,618,750
George Kittle - 1,742 - 41 - 60% - $9,252,148
Raheem Mostert - 716 - 17 - 25% - $7,120,833
Jason Verrett - 866 - 20 - 31% - $5,582,353
K'Waun Williams - 1,305 - 30 - 47% - $6,316,875
Javon Kinlaw - 695 - 29 - 45% - $4,576,207
Fred Warner - 2,680 - 62 - 97% - $3,830,505
Deebo Samuel - 1,614 - 38 - 56% - $4,198,558
Brandon Aiyuk - 1,093 - 46 - 68% - $3,702,444
D.J. Jones - 1,008 - 23 - 37% - $3,271,875
Emmanuel Moseley - 1,646 - 38 - 60% - $2,496,000
Jeff Wilson - 376 - 9 - 13% - $2,311,471
Samson Ebukam - 229 - 29 - 45% - $1,860,294

Here are the top 20 most expensive players over the past 2.5 years NOT including the offensive line. The site I use doesn't track offensive linemen and their snap counts. But no doubt, it follows this same exact pattern as well given this is a team philosophy. I also didn't count ex-49ers like Buckner or Sherman; just those on the roster today.

Since 2019 (43 games), this FO has spent $216,677,932 for their top 20 most expensive players (non-OL) who are playing only 52% of the total possible snaps per game.

That's only 3 players (bolded) earning their money by staying on the field. As to their level of play commensurate their contracts? That's debatable.

This is a very poor return on investment esp. when you consider the positional value of many of these (i.e. QB, ER, WR, 3T, CB1, LB, FB, etc.).

So I go back to my original take: This FO not only invests poorly in injured players but counts on them and pays them well. This is the real reason we're constantly up against the cap. Poor original investments and then the added costs to put out the inevitable fires when they all drop like flies and are only available for 52% of the snaps.

I'm not gonna deny that they have paid a lot for guys who ended up getting hurt, but I stand by the reason they're tight for both 2020 & 2021 was COVID, up until 2020 they carried over between $35m to $55m a year, as I've said this years cap went down by basically $32.5m.

what site are you using & where are those salaries coming from? Also you need to note that some of those players were slotted, as in draft picks, meaning no matter who they took there would make that money.
Also of those players only a handful really missed a lot of time, you need to factor in how they rotate players, on the DL, WRs, etc….

Also you can't possibly expect all 22 starters to play 100% of the teams snaps that's why you have 48 active on game days & 53 overall plus 16 practice squaders
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I'm not gonna deny that they have paid a lot for guys who ended up getting hurt, but I stand by the reason they're tight for both 2020 & 2021 was COVID, up until 2020 they carried over between $35m to $55m a year, as I've said this years cap went down by basically $32.5m.

what site are you using & where are those salaries coming from? Also you need to note that some of those players were slotted, as in draft picks, meaning no matter who they took there would make that money.

You know I only use OTC. 😉

Here are the snap counts

With OTC, simply click on the player > History to see what the team/player committed to on the contracts. Add up 2019, 2020 and 1/2 of 2021. You're welcome to dive into the semantics on what was actually paid out but the point is, that's what the team committed to pay that player whether through FA or draft slot.

Again, these are your top 20 paid players so if you're not expecting them to play significant snaps, you're expecting a significant contribution in the snaps they are slated for (i.e. nickel CB). And that's not happening either.

Yes, QB, OL, CB, MIKE, S, WR1, etc. should be hitting closer to 100% while others like nickel CB, 3rd down ER, SAM, etc. and positions like that should be closer to 67%...FB and TE1? You decide what's appropriate for their top salaries at their positions (use their peers for comparison like Travis Kelce).

But no matter how you slice it, it's poor...really poor, especially when compared to their peers in the same market contracts. You are massively in the red on ROI here and like I said, I didn't even count players like the OL (all those snaps lost), Sherman, Buckner and countless other acquisitions between 2019 and 2021.

As to the COVID off season, that's irrelevant. Every single team had to contend with that. Every team, no matter how much over, got under. As noted above, had this FO made better decisions, it would have been even more irrelevant. In fact, weren't they like top 10 in cap space coming in anyhow WITH a FQB already paid for and only one bigger ticket in-house FA left to sign? They were plenty healthy. That's a poor excuse to me.
[ Edited by NCommand on Nov 15, 2021 at 5:41 AM ]
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
I'm not gonna deny that they have paid a lot for guys who ended up getting hurt, but I stand by the reason they're tight for both 2020 & 2021 was COVID, up until 2020 they carried over between $35m to $55m a year, as I've said this years cap went down by basically $32.5m.

what site are you using & where are those salaries coming from? Also you need to note that some of those players were slotted, as in draft picks, meaning no matter who they took there would make that money.

You know I only use OTC. 😉

Here are the snap counts

With OTC, simply click on the player > History to see what the team/player committed to on the contracts. Add up 2019, 2020 and 1/2 of 2021. You're welcome to dive into the semantics on what was actually paid out but the point is, that's what the team committed to pay that player whether through FA or draft slot.

Again, these are your top 20 paid players so if you're not expecting them to play significant snaps, you're expecting a significant contribution in the snaps they are slated for (i.e. nickel CB). And that's not happening either.

Yes, QB, OL, CB, MIKE, S, WR1, etc. should be hitting closer to 100% while others like nickel CB, 3rd down ER, SAM, etc. and positions like that should be closer to 67%...FB and TE1? You decide what's appropriate for their top salaries at their positions (use their peers for comparison like Travis Kelce).

But no matter how you slice it, it's poor...really poor, especially when compared to their peers in the same market contracts. You are massively in the red on ROI here and like I said, I didn't even count players like the OL (all those snaps lost), Sherman, Buckner and countless other acquisitions between 2019 and 2021.

As to the COVID off season, that's irrelevant. Every single team had to contend with that. Every team, no matter how much over, got under. As noted above, had this FO made better decisions, it would have been even more irrelevant. In fact, weren't they like top 10 in cap space coming in anyhow WITH a FQB already paid for and only one bigger ticket in-house FA left to sign? They were plenty healthy. That's a poor excuse to me.

Ok, first, you can't expect them to play every starter 100% of the snaps.

As for the guys you listed, the bolded are guys I agree we overpaid, the guys bolded & italicized are guys who didn't miss as much time as you'd think, if you're going by 2019-2021.

Player - Total Snaps - Snaps AVG Per Game - % of Total Snaps - Total Contract

Jimmy Garoppolo - 1,964 - 46 - 68% - $59,800,000
Dee Ford - 482 - 11 - 18% - $26,939,294
Arik Armstead - 2,068 - 48 - 75% - $21,273,941
Nick Bosa - 1,399 - 33 - 51% - $18,443,518
Kyle Juszczyk - 1,275 - 30 - 44% - $13,775,736
Jimmie Ward - 2,301 - 54 - 84% - $10,307,133
Jaquiski Tartt - 1,600 - 37 - 58% - $11,618,750
George Kittle - 1,742 - 41 - 60% - $9,252,148
Raheem Mostert - 716 - 17 - 25% - $7,120,833
Jason Verrett - 866 - 20 - 31% - $5,582,353
K'Waun Williams - 1,305 - 30 - 47% - $6,316,875
Javon Kinlaw - 695 - 29 - 45% - $4,576,207
Fred Warner - 2,680 - 62 - 97% - $3,830,505
Deebo Samuel - 1,614 - 38 - 56% - $4,198,558
Brandon Aiyuk - 1,093 - 46 - 68% - $3,702,444
D.J. Jones - 1,008 - 23 - 37% - $3,271,875
Emmanuel Moseley - 1,646 - 38 - 60% - $2,496,000
Jeff Wilson - 376 - 9 - 13% - $2,311,471
Samson Ebukam - 229 - 29 - 45% - $1,860,294

As for guys who are on rookie deals, you have Bosa, Kittle(2019), Kinlaw, Warner(2019-2020), Deebo, Aiyuk, Jones(2019-2020), Moseley(2019-2020), Wilson(2019-2020). So those guys were gonna get what they got no matter where they went too.

I agree that the QB should be play 100% or as close to it as possible, I don't agree with FB, since not many teams use one, and Kyle, finally, is using him way more often, plus we don't always have a FB on the field, or else it'd be obviously a running play, RB wise, no one, or very few teams still use 1 RB over 80% of the time, the 49ers have always, under Kyle, gone with a RB by Committee approach, WR wise, when it comes to Deebo & Aiyuk, Deebo missed 1 game in 2019, he played I think only 8 in 2020, but that was due to that dumb camp Jimmy thing, hardly injury prone, Aiyuk wise, he missed 4 games, 2 to injury, 2 to COVID-19 list in 2020, and one of those COVID game he could have played, same game Trent missed, that the NFL refused to move to Sunday(the GB game I believe), plus Kyle also rotates WRs, he uses more than 2, usually 3, this year, he's been getting all 5 active into the gameplan, players need rest, they can't go out there week in week out, and play 100%. OL wise, most of our starters(Trent, Mack, Laken, Brunskill) have played pretty much every down this season.

On defense, again you can't expect the same 4 DL to play every game, so guys like Bosa need a breather, 2020 was unusual, as Armstead & Hyder played nearly every down because of Ford & Bosa's injuries, which I should say the Bosa injury was a freak one IMO, I don't want to make excuses, but it's not coincidence that Bosa, Thomas, Jimmy, Mostert, Coleman(I think), & Reed all got hurt on that field at MetLife in back to back weeks, plus even Giants & Jets players complained about it. For the most part DJ has been healthy, he's missed a few games here and there. AA since 2019 has proven to be not only healthy but worth the money(I'm not saying I'd have paid him $17M a yr, but he's produced, forget the sack numbers, he does more, getting pressure on the QB, yes it'd be great to get the QB, but he's doing a damn good job IMO), Kinlaw is unfortunate, but I'm tired of hearing the whole Wirfs this Wirfs that, do I wish we didn't trade Buck, HELL YES, I was pissed, but I like Kinlaw, and won't write him off, he's not Hurd, where Hurd never played a game, he was a bust.

LB Wise, Warner has played pretty much every down, until 2021 Dre as well(well after Kwon's injury), also we don't always put 3 LBs on the field, so we do rotate with guys like Azeez, Harris, etc.... DB wise, this sucks I agree, Verrett has been injury prone way too often, but 2020 looked like he turned the corner, he was signed to a 1yr $5.5M deal, some, including you, said he could get $10M on a multi year deal, I said no way, I'm fine that they gave him that deal, and not a multi year deal, Moseley has been healthy for the most part, but he needs to play better, we need to play Lenoir & Ambry, luckily they'll be active tonight. As for the Safeties, no doubt Tartt has been too injury prone, while Ward has been a soldier since 2019, and he's a guy who makes the defense better IMO.

As for my COVID-19 reason, it's a true IMO, look at the teams current cap room, from OTC as of today.
Team Cap Space
Jaguars $27,520,435
Eagles $21,215,783
Broncos $14,372,501
Seahawks $13,520,037
Washington $10,702,662
Chargers $10,247,189
Steelers $10,163,841
Bengals $8,863,846
Browns $7,464,472
Texans $5,268,056
Panthers $5,021,168
Packers $4,909,867
Patriots $4,502,148
Cowboys $4,277,030
Jets $4,060,437
Vikings $3,965,303
Giants $3,804,880
Bears $3,464,216
Chiefs $3,283,041
49ers $3,253,428
Buccaneers $3,223,173
Bills $3,199,448
Raiders $2,884,766
Titans $2,837,027
Colts $2,569,201
Lions $2,139,412
Falcons $1,748,508
Rams $1,602,788
Saints $1,029,763
Ravens $711,407
Dolphins $616,584
Cardinals ($655,875)

Notice how many teams have less than $10M in cap room(25 teams, 5 have $10M-$14M, only 2 have have over $20M, Jags & Eagles), that shows that the loss of not just the $15.7M from $198.2M to $182.5M hurt, but also the fact that from 2020 to 2021, the cap should have went from $198.2M to $215M, pre COVID, that's another $16.8M drop, so in total, teams lost $32.5M in potential cap room, imagine what that could have done for teams like NO who were $100M over, that right there, put them just $67.5M over, still a lot, NO has a bad cap management issue.

If the cap even never went down, and stayed at what the NFLPA wanted, $198.2M, that's $15.7M more for each team, meaning no need to redo anyone for the 49ers, except Richburg since he was retiring, and maybe Dee since he wasn't being kept at his price, but Ward would have never been redone.

Basically, the issues with the 49ers is a mixture of giving money to players who END up getting hurt, and the issue with the pandemic causing the cap to go down, look at the deals that were given pre-2020, no one knew a pandemic was gonna happen, so they backloaded deals(Jimmy, Kwon, Dee, Richburg, etc...). It's clear things need to change in Santa Clara, but it's not firing Lynch & Shanahan, it's gotta be better evaluating what players to target, don't give big deals to guys who have had injury issues in the past, unless minor ones, and still look into low money, high reward guys, cause there are guys out there, who, could end up costing much less than some big name, and give us as good of production as the big name would.

Also look at fans this offseason & in season clamoring for guys who are in their 30s + injury prone or have had serious injuries, Julio Jones, now he's on IR for at least 3 weeks, I don't even know what he's done for TEN, Stephon Gilmore, he wants $15M a yr, coming off a serious injury, no way the 49ers, nor would I invest $15M a yr into Gilmore, yet fans wanted him because we need help at CB, which is true, but also because he's a big name, then OBJ & Von, OBJ is 1. a locker room & on field distraction IMO, even you said you didn't care if we got him or not, but now, because the Rams got him, it's an issue? As for Von, no way I give up a 2 & 3 for him just so DEN eats $9M, not when he's a FA at the end of the season, the highest pick we can get comp wise is a 2023 5th, due to his age.

As for the whole people being upset we didn't make a "splash" move, that would require redoing guys like Laken(who already counts $1,005,530 in dead money in 2022), or Armstead(which would add onto his 2022-2024 cap numbers), or even Jimmy(Say you save $6.5M, his savings go from $24.845M to $18.345M, which no it's not bad, but, since the 49ers will likely be around $9M-$11M over the 2022 cap, if it does indeed hit the ceiling of $208.2M, that makes the net savings from just Jimmy just $9.345M-$7.345M, that's what we'd be under, then you add in any savings from Laken & AA, that's more lost cap room.

I get the whole redoing Donald is smart, because he's dependable, but sooner or later, it catches up top you, it did for the Saints, all the times they redid Brees to have cap room, Steelers with Ben, GB with Rodgers, NO & GB are projected over next year, only PIT has been able to get out of it after YEARS of doing this.

And I agree with OTC(On The Clock) had to say in his thread about the issue isn't what you think, it's not drafting, we're at 40% according to him, I've said that 30%-35% hit rate makes you a good GM, also and this is a fact, I wish I could fine the image I saw, but, most draft picks(because it's a crapshoot) don't make it past year 3 of their rookie deal, let alone a 2nd contract.

I do agree, the team needs to consider taking some power from Kyle, maybe promote Peters to GM, Lynch to a higher position, but the last thing Jed need to do is be impulsive, and fire them, he's really shown he's off hands when it comes to football decisions, he was impulsive firing Harbaugh when it was Baalke's fault, even though Harbaugh was/is an ego maniac, who can't lead 19-21yr olds, let along MEN, 2nd he took too long to fire Baalke, he hired/fired Chip & Tomsula after 1yr, right moves, but still, neither should have been hired in the first place.

As for the whole notion that the locker room has lost faith in Kyle, I find that as BS, guys have come out and said they believe in Kyle & the talent they have, I don't agree with certain players getting time over others(Norman & Dre over Lenoir & Ambry, no getting Sermon more involved after he had a good game, I forget which week, he had a TD, then he's nowhere to be found, keeping Cannon on the team, not giving Banks a chance over Brunskill at RG, I'm happy to see Aiyuk getting the PT he deserves, I wish Sherfield, and hope with Sanu out, he'll get the 3rd WR snaps now)
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

What does the back of your hand tell you about our cap space next season? Are we able to move on from Ford? We're gonna need some FA vets
Originally posted by Youngone:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

What does the back of your hand tell you about our cap space next season? Are we able to move on from Ford? We're gonna need some FA vets

We can move on from Dee, but, it'd be 2 different scenarios, you don't pay him his $4.6M injury GTD roster bonus, you save $2M before the top 51, you pay him the $4.6M RB, June 1 him, you save $2.4M pre top 51.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

Thanks so much for the reply! This is why this thread and you in particular, are tops in my book. I'd never question your expertise on the cap.

I will disagree on player personnel, valuations, FO strategies and philosophy and back that up with evidence. That's my area of strength given I document every transaction in my Team Needs thread, develop off season plans, and monitor player acquisitions and lean heavily on our subject matter experts from the draft to help develop that plan. I also run the injury thread so like you, those two areas (transactions + health), like the cap, make up the full picture of reality.

I didn't mean to discredit the COVID landscape...just that it was a condition ALL teams had to contend with and us going in to that with a FQB paid for, top 10 in cap space and with only 1 key in-house extension needed (Warner), we were in terrific shape compared to the rest of the league. In fact, it allowed us to pick up a number of veterans for next to nothing because other teams had to cut fat.

Yeah, the exercise just highlights that no matter the draft position and the corresponding contracts or free agency or in-house extensions, they aren't getting what they paid for as evidenced by the snap counts. A big chunk of that is on WHO they acquire/retain and some is on the current timing (i.e. Kittle missing half his snaps both years after his new contract).

Health has been at the heart of all the issues for 8 straight years now so until they rectify it, this will continue to be the trend...poor ROI.

Aside from about 3 players, the rest are missing vital playing time on the field commensurate their roles and past snaps when healthy.
[ Edited by NCommand on Nov 15, 2021 at 1:12 PM ]
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

Thanks so much for the reply! This is why this thread and you in particular, are tops in my book. I'd never question your expertise on the cap.

I will disagree on player personnel, valuations, FO strategies and philosophy and back that up with evidence. That's my area of strength given I document every transaction in my Team Needs thread, develop off season plans, and monitor player acquisitions and lean heavily on our subject matter experts from the draft to help develop that plan. I also run the injury thread so like you, those two areas (transactions + health), like the cap, make up the full picture of reality.

I didn't mean to discredit the COVID landscape...just that it was a condition ALL teams had to contend with and us going in to that with a FQB paid for, top 10 in cap space and with only 1 key in-house extension needed (Warner), we were in terrific shape compared to the rest of the league. In fact, it allowed us to pick up a number of veterans for next to nothing because other teams had to cut fat.

Yeah, the exercise just highlights that no matter the draft position and the corresponding contracts or free agency or in-house extensions, they aren't getting what they paid for as evidenced by the snap counts. A big chunk of that is on WHO they acquire/retain and some is on the current timing (i.e. Kittle missing half his snaps both years after his new contract).

Health has been at the heart of all the issues for 8 straight years now so until they rectify it, this will continue to be the trend...poor ROI.

Aside from about 3 players, the rest are missing vital playing time on the field commensurate their roles and past snaps when healthy.

And I'm in no way discrediting your work either, your is top notch as well, I'm just saying COVID plays a factor into it, and the reason why teams are bringing in guys like LA did with OBJ & Von were due to basically paying them less than $2M combined, while CLE ate $4.25M, and DEN $9M, while LA had to send a 2nd & 3rd for a EDGE that has had major injury issues, if it works out for them, then maybe it's something we do need to look into, if not, then it'll be looked as a colossal failure by Les Snead & Sean McVay.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

Thanks so much for the reply! This is why this thread and you in particular, are tops in my book. I'd never question your expertise on the cap.

I will disagree on player personnel, valuations, FO strategies and philosophy and back that up with evidence. That's my area of strength given I document every transaction in my Team Needs thread, develop off season plans, and monitor player acquisitions and lean heavily on our subject matter experts from the draft to help develop that plan. I also run the injury thread so like you, those two areas (transactions + health), like the cap, make up the full picture of reality.

I didn't mean to discredit the COVID landscape...just that it was a condition ALL teams had to contend with and us going in to that with a FQB paid for, top 10 in cap space and with only 1 key in-house extension needed (Warner), we were in terrific shape compared to the rest of the league. In fact, it allowed us to pick up a number of veterans for next to nothing because other teams had to cut fat.

Yeah, the exercise just highlights that no matter the draft position and the corresponding contracts or free agency or in-house extensions, they aren't getting what they paid for as evidenced by the snap counts. A big chunk of that is on WHO they acquire/retain and some is on the current timing (i.e. Kittle missing half his snaps both years after his new contract).

Health has been at the heart of all the issues for 8 straight years now so until they rectify it, this will continue to be the trend...poor ROI.

Aside from about 3 players, the rest are missing vital playing time on the field commensurate their roles and past snaps when healthy.

And I'm in no way discrediting your work either, your is top notch as well, I'm just saying COVID plays a factor into it, and the reason why teams are bringing in guys like LA did with OBJ & Von were due to basically paying them less than $2M combined, while CLE ate $4.25M, and DEN $9M, while LA had to send a 2nd & 3rd for a EDGE that has had major injury issues, if it works out for them, then maybe it's something we do need to look into, if not, then it'll be looked as a colossal failure by Les Snead & Sean McVay.

For sure. I don't like using the Rams as a model for the 49ers but it is a model and they are in that position to get those two because of the other quality trades they made that make them an attractive destination. Remember, Kyle tried to get Stafford too. And that goes to the frustration of the fans that feels like this team wants to be competitive but isn't too serious about competing for the best players like them and the Cardinals while preaching, "You gotta win the division first!" The opposite extreme is the Vikings who built from the draft almost exclusively and that didn't work either.

So when you see fans upset we didn't sign so-and-so player, just know that that is more symbolism around a FO they feel isn't willing to do whatever it takes to win it all anymore. As that used to be a staple of the 49ers...so much so they created the salary cap just to stop us. Fans simply want to see a historic moneyball team buck that trend and get very serious about not only being competitive but truly trying to do everything in their power to win it all.
Originally posted by NCommand:
^ I did it for you.

Player - Total Snaps - Snaps AVG Per Game - % of Total Snaps - Total Contract
Jimmy Garoppolo - 1,964 - 46 - 68% - $59,800,000
Dee Ford - 482 - 11 - 18% - $26,939,294
Arik Armstead - 2,068 - 48 - 75% - $21,273,941
Nick Bosa - 1,399 - 33 - 51% - $18,443,518
Kyle Juszczyk - 1,275 - 30 - 44% - $13,775,736
Jimmie Ward - 2,301 - 54 - 84% - $10,307,133
Jaquiski Tartt - 1,600 - 37 - 58% - $11,618,750
George Kittle - 1,742 - 41 - 60% - $9,252,148
Raheem Mostert - 716 - 17 - 25% - $7,120,833
Jason Verrett - 866 - 20 - 31% - $5,582,353
K'Waun Williams - 1,305 - 30 - 47% - $6,316,875
Javon Kinlaw - 695 - 29 - 45% - $4,576,207
Fred Warner - 2,680 - 62 - 97% - $3,830,505
Deebo Samuel - 1,614 - 38 - 56% - $4,198,558
Brandon Aiyuk - 1,093 - 46 - 68% - $3,702,444
D.J. Jones - 1,008 - 23 - 37% - $3,271,875
Emmanuel Moseley - 1,646 - 38 - 60% - $2,496,000
Jeff Wilson - 376 - 9 - 13% - $2,311,471
Samson Ebukam - 229 - 29 - 45% - $1,860,294

Here are the top 20 most expensive players over the past 2.5 years NOT including the offensive line. The site I use doesn't track offensive linemen and their snap counts. But no doubt, it follows this same exact pattern as well given this is a team philosophy. I also didn't count ex-49ers like Buckner or Sherman; just those on the roster today.

Since 2019 (43 games), this FO has spent $216,677,932 for their top 20 most expensive players (non-OL) who are playing only 52% of the total possible snaps per game.

That's only 3 players (bolded) earning their money by staying on the field. As to their level of play commensurate their contracts? That's debatable.

This is a very poor return on investment esp. when you consider the positional value of many of these (i.e. QB, ER, WR, 3T, CB1, LB, FB, etc.).

So I go back to my original take: This FO not only invests poorly in injured players but counts on them and pays them well. This is the real reason we're constantly up against the cap. Poor original investments and then the added costs to put out the inevitable fires when they all drop like flies and are only available for 52% of the snaps.

AB, you sparked the original deeper dive here but this is another reason for doing it. Myself and others might have thought we still weren't getting ROI with Ward given his injury history. But this exercise showed me he's one of three players who are giving us the snaps we paid for...and he's giving us the production too. That's a positive ROI.

Ward has a passer rating allowed so far this season of just 29.4. A QB can throw it straight into the turf every time and still get a 39.6 passer rating. #49ers https://t.co/41MnEH5MUS

— Jeff Deeney (@PFF_Jeff) November 18, 2021
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,371
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NCommand:
^ I did it for you.

Player - Total Snaps - Snaps AVG Per Game - % of Total Snaps - Total Contract
Jimmy Garoppolo - 1,964 - 46 - 68% - $59,800,000
Dee Ford - 482 - 11 - 18% - $26,939,294
Arik Armstead - 2,068 - 48 - 75% - $21,273,941
Nick Bosa - 1,399 - 33 - 51% - $18,443,518
Kyle Juszczyk - 1,275 - 30 - 44% - $13,775,736
Jimmie Ward - 2,301 - 54 - 84% - $10,307,133
Jaquiski Tartt - 1,600 - 37 - 58% - $11,618,750
George Kittle - 1,742 - 41 - 60% - $9,252,148
Raheem Mostert - 716 - 17 - 25% - $7,120,833
Jason Verrett - 866 - 20 - 31% - $5,582,353
K'Waun Williams - 1,305 - 30 - 47% - $6,316,875
Javon Kinlaw - 695 - 29 - 45% - $4,576,207
Fred Warner - 2,680 - 62 - 97% - $3,830,505
Deebo Samuel - 1,614 - 38 - 56% - $4,198,558
Brandon Aiyuk - 1,093 - 46 - 68% - $3,702,444
D.J. Jones - 1,008 - 23 - 37% - $3,271,875
Emmanuel Moseley - 1,646 - 38 - 60% - $2,496,000
Jeff Wilson - 376 - 9 - 13% - $2,311,471
Samson Ebukam - 229 - 29 - 45% - $1,860,294

Here are the top 20 most expensive players over the past 2.5 years NOT including the offensive line. The site I use doesn't track offensive linemen and their snap counts. But no doubt, it follows this same exact pattern as well given this is a team philosophy. I also didn't count ex-49ers like Buckner or Sherman; just those on the roster today.

Since 2019 (43 games), this FO has spent $216,677,932 for their top 20 most expensive players (non-OL) who are playing only 52% of the total possible snaps per game.

That's only 3 players (bolded) earning their money by staying on the field. As to their level of play commensurate their contracts? That's debatable.

This is a very poor return on investment esp. when you consider the positional value of many of these (i.e. QB, ER, WR, 3T, CB1, LB, FB, etc.).

So I go back to my original take: This FO not only invests poorly in injured players but counts on them and pays them well. This is the real reason we're constantly up against the cap. Poor original investments and then the added costs to put out the inevitable fires when they all drop like flies and are only available for 52% of the snaps.

AB, you sparked the original deeper dive here but this is another reason for doing it. Myself and others might have thought we still weren't getting ROI with Ward given his injury history. But this exercise showed me he's one of three players who are giving us the snaps we paid for...and he's giving us the production too. That's a positive ROI.

Ward has a passer rating allowed so far this season of just 29.4. A QB can throw it straight into the turf every time and still get a 39.6 passer rating. #49ers https://t.co/41MnEH5MUS

— Jeff Deeney (@PFF_Jeff) November 18, 2021

Just doing some rough calculations. Jimmy per snap --> $30,448 per snap. Dee Ford --> $55,890 per snap. Arik -->$10,287 per snap. Bosa ---> $13,183 per snap.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by Youngone:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

What does the back of your hand tell you about our cap space next season? Are we able to move on from Ford? We're gonna need some FA vets

We can move on from Dee, but, it'd be 2 different scenarios, you don't pay him his $4.6M injury GTD roster bonus, you save $2M before the top 51, you pay him the $4.6M RB, June 1 him, you save $2.4M pre top 51.

Thanks AB, do you know what our projected cap is next season before making the necessary cuts?

sorry if it's a played out question.
Originally posted by Youngone:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by Youngone:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
As for your last point about 10th in cap room, that was because they redid Dee, Richburg, as well as managing the cap to where they got the guys signed with low yr 1 cap numbers, so yes, COVID had an issue in play, but yes, paying a lot for injured guys does too. It's really both, more so COVID IMO, and that's me, because I've studied the cap since 2006, I know the cap like the back of my hand.

What does the back of your hand tell you about our cap space next season? Are we able to move on from Ford? We're gonna need some FA vets

We can move on from Dee, but, it'd be 2 different scenarios, you don't pay him his $4.6M injury GTD roster bonus, you save $2M before the top 51, you pay him the $4.6M RB, June 1 him, you save $2.4M pre top 51.

Thanks AB, do you know what our projected cap is next season before making the necessary cuts?

sorry if it's a played out question.

Right now, with 51 players signed(we only have 31, so 20 fake players making $705K each), we'd be about $4.657M over the cap, but when you factor in that Deebo, Dre, Wishnowsky, & Omenihu will see their salaries rise to the original round tender for 2022(Deebo can get the 2nd rd tender by making the pro bowl), we'll be between $9M-$11M over.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone