Originally posted by jdt84_2:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
No reason to go to extremes, no one is talking about Donald or needing a "dominant" rookie DT from day 1. They have no proven interior pass rushers right now. They didn't draft any DTs that showed they were interior rushers…those are projections. I'm fine with that IF you have other players in place to hold the fort down.
we're dependent on rookies who haven't done it at a lesser level and who else? Imo it's an issue not many are talking about, we just assume they drafted a couple IDL so we're good there
It was an extreme, but my point, wasthere any pass rushing IDL that was not a run defense liability?
They chose to go the other way and get run guys who they hope can develop and a DE who can maybe develop into a dominant inside rusher.
Stop getting to 3rd and <3's.
In this draft? I mean you could have gone with a pass rush guy and a run defender. There was plenty of both in this draft. They opted for multiple run defenders, which I get but we're acting like we have someone that can rush from the inside and that's a pretty big ? at thus pt.
I mean, if you can't get pressure on 3rd downs what's the difference? They could have kept someone like M Collins Who was pretty effective as a pass rusher and wasn't super expensive.
