There are 272 users in the forums
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
It shouldn't. I think everyone understands Darnold is a weaker QB.
Originally posted by mayo49:What debate, Jimmy g is a FA also.. start that debate lol
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man, myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by mayo49:What debate, Jimmy g is a FA also.. start that debate lol
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man, myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
Originally posted by mayo49:now you see, how we see your post
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by mayo49:What debate, Jimmy g is a FA also.. start that debate lol
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man, myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by mayo49:now you see, how we see your post
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by mayo49:What debate, Jimmy g is a FA also.. start that debate lol
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
All that extra cash and less playoff wins. Sign me up.
We can win with Darnold, too and get even more weapons with him than if we gave it to Purdy.
We were 0-1 with Darnold starting here in a year we went to the SB with Brock.
Vikings didn't have enough weapons for him?
Just trying to keep the debate going. I'm a Dirty Purdy man, myself. Just so you know where I stand. Just concerned Darnold becoming a FA can throw a wrench in the negotiations.
Originally posted by mayo49:Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
Originally posted by Alfienator:
We don't want a QB who folds like a lawn chair under pressure.
Purdy just needs more protection and a few more WR's who run precise routes. Purdy is pretty good at anticipating routes before the breaks and some guys change/ drift their routes which causes incompletions and int's. That is one reason Kyle has a problem with rookie receivers. JMO 
Agree with you on Darnold…..
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
We don't want a QB who folds like a lawn chair under pressure.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by Alfienator:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Do the Niners take Purdy at 5yrs/$300M or Darnold at 5yrs/$225? Could get very interesting...Could do a lot with that extra cash.
We don't want a QB who folds like a lawn chair under pressure.
Would you prefer a lawn chair that plays like a QB?