What will Jimmy's trade value be in the offseason?

Originally posted by 4ML:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 4ML:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
They got too many picks and too big a void at the position. Make it happen.

https://www.ninersnation.com/2022/3/23/22992020/49ers-in-five-how-possible-is-houston-for-jimmy-garoppolo-news-trade

IMO Panthers make a lot of sense too. They can easily finish at 2 in their division with Jimmy and possibly 1 if father time starts to catch up with Brady. They can draft a QB and groom him behind Jimmy for a year - maybe 2 if Jimmy plays well - since there are no elite prospects - there will be no pressure to start them in year 2. Their HC is going into year 3 of his contract and may be under some pressure to at least contend for a playoff spot.

My guess is Carolina is drafting Willis at 6 or they will trade down with the Seahawks and still draft Pickett or someone.

Yea I have read that too. I think it's way too high but that has never QB needy teams to reach for a QB. So, it is quite possible. I still think they can offer a 2nd in 2023 draft and trade for Jimmy for this year and keep Willis on the training wheels for a year and see where things are at the end of the season.

Or maybe they're smart and will play their high draft pick and not waste valuable cap space on Jimmy.

I bet Seahawks will take Willis and he becomes a superstar… 😡. Much rather have Carolina or Atlanta take Willis.

Originally posted by hello49:

Originally posted by 4ML:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by 4ML:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
They got too many picks and too big a void at the position. Make it happen.

https://www.ninersnation.com/2022/3/23/22992020/49ers-in-five-how-possible-is-houston-for-jimmy-garoppolo-news-trade

IMO Panthers make a lot of sense too. They can easily finish at 2 in their division with Jimmy and possibly 1 if father time starts to catch up with Brady. They can draft a QB and groom him behind Jimmy for a year - maybe 2 if Jimmy plays well - since there are no elite prospects - there will be no pressure to start them in year 2. Their HC is going into year 3 of his contract and may be under some pressure to at least contend for a playoff spot.

My guess is Carolina is drafting Willis at 6 or they will trade down with the Seahawks and still draft Pickett or someone.

Yea I have read that too. I think it's way too high but that has never QB needy teams to reach for a QB. So, it is quite possible. I still think they can offer a 2nd in 2023 draft and trade for Jimmy for this year and keep Willis on the training wheels for a year and see where things are at the end of the season.

Or maybe they're smart and will play their high draft pick and not waste valuable cap space on Jimmy.

I bet Seahawks will take Willis and he becomes a superstar… 😡. Much rather have Carolina or Atlanta take Willis.

Carolina has #6, Seattle has #9 so Panthers seemingly have the inside track. Course Seattle could use some of that draft haul from Russ and leap frog em. Willis has been flying up the boards from what I hear.

At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Joecool:
Jimmy's trade value is probably a 5th rounder or whatever a backup QB is traded for because Jimmy is officially now Lance's backup.

Where is that official?

Somebody didn't get the memo.

I'm wondering did they put something out recently?

They said long ago that Trey will take every snap with the starting lineup, that the plan is for him to start. The fact that Jimmy is still on the roster officially puts him behind Trey. So I suppose he could be tbe 3rd string QB.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Why would a team trade for JG when they can get him for free after 2022 season?

We should cut him now while his value is extremely low, let him see what's out there and if it is something we are willing to match, then sign him for 3 years.

That would put us in an ideal QB situation.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Sounds identical to Joshua garnett. He feet are slow and the only thing that made him okay in PP at ND was the fact that he was a big man…and let's stop acting like he's some raw IOL who played on some tier 2 program in college. He was at freaking notre dame for years. One of the best colleges at getting OL where they need to be…top end OL coaching.

I would love nothing more than for him to come out and be at least as good as Laken. The reality of it is he most likely won't. I wasn't the only person underwhelmed with the pick and the fit either.

listen man not every guy that comes to SF is gonna be good. No need to defend every single player and move.

I was more in the are you freaking kidding me camp

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Sudfeld is pretty bad IMO.

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Why would a team trade for JG when they can get him for free after 2022 season?

We should cut him now while his value is extremely low, let him see what's out their and if it is something we are willing to match, then sign him for 3 years.

That would put us in an ideal QB situation.

Because a QB will go down and get injured. It happens every year. Then we have leverage.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Sudfeld is pretty bad IMO.

You still get an A overall 9/10

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Sudfeld is pretty bad IMO.

You still get an A overall 9/10

Thanks.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Why would a team trade for JG when they can get him for free after 2022 season?

We should cut him now while his value is extremely low, let him see what's out their and if it is something we are willing to match, then sign him for 3 years.

That would put us in an ideal QB situation.

Because a QB will go down and get injured. It happens every year. Then we have leverage.

Only if it is a team that really didn't believe in their QB to begin with. Would be better for a team with a franchise QB to call it a season and get a higher draft pick.

Now if a QB like Wentz gets hurt, then JG would be an option.

JG value is dead.

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by Joecool:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
At this point they are absolutely correct to keep him.

* Some big QB will get hurt. It happens every year. They get desperate and trade for Jimmy G. That equals out to next years picks. Which is OK.

* We could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if we keep him.

* He can play if Trey Lance isn't ready.

* He can play if Trey Lance gets hurt.

* Most of the big name FA are already spoken for. So it's not a big deal. You mostly over pay in FA for older injured players. The Rams TRADED for most of their players if you want to use that example.

* We still have to sign Deebo and Kittle. We still can too. Allocated towards future years. When Jimmy G comes off the books after this year.

* Having Sudfeld as your backup is horrifying.

We honestly could carry him all year and it's not that bad. The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Spot on

edit: except for the Sudfeld part he's good

Why would a team trade for JG when they can get him for free after 2022 season?

We should cut him now while his value is extremely low, let him see what's out their and if it is something we are willing to match, then sign him for 3 years.

That would put us in an ideal QB situation.

Because a QB will go down and get injured. It happens every year. Then we have leverage.

Only if it is a team that really didn't believe in their QB to begin with. Would be better for a team with a franchise QB to call it a season and get a higher draft pick.

Now if a QB like Wentz gets hurt, then JG would be an option.

An established team will try to win. Not a rebuild project. You can with Jimmy G.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
The injury, surgery, recovery and high salary are doing a lot of this. It's not that he has no value. That's not it. It's just a bad situation. Keeping him for a while isn't bad for us now.

Nah...it's just that his value is so low it doesn't warrant significant investment from other teams. If Jimmy were cut, he would be picked up. Hence, his value is not zero. But it's pretty damn low. Do you think any current QB listed in the top ten would have so little interest if they were in the same circumstance? There isn't a chance. And that probably applies to a few QBs in the 10-15 range as well. That's how little other NFL teams value JG, based on their actions (or lack thereof). No value? No, you're right. He has a some value...not much, but it's more than nothing.

I need some damn Garoppolo passing his physical news.