There are 498 users in the forums

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

  • JEP83
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 440
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by genus49:
I'm going to start editing people's posts who are rehashing the same crap we've talked about for years now. Clearly nobody is swaying the other person's opinions on the matter so then what's the point?

There is a lot of new things to talk about in regards to the team and Kyle's coaching/roster management abilities.

At some point enough is enough, we get it. Move on because the constant whining isn't gonna change anything and it's so lazy and stale at this point.

Kyle our HC and most likely will be for the foreseeable future. Let's get over it and discuss other stuff.

Genus for the love of all humanity please do. Tired of hearing about Super Bowl calls or other shat for years back etc. Time to move on.
I am still feeling ugh about Shanny after that SEA game, how can he be that dumb? It would be nice to move on..if he could..from his brain farts

Idk if he will ever get a ring, cause he shoots himself in the foot..every.single.time. lol

It's just getting old.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,894
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by RickyRoma:
A lot of it is luck. Shanahan had the 'unfortunate' luck to lose to Reid/Mahomes in the Super Bowls, and we kinda all know...or should know that the league really wanted that to happen (make Mahomes the face of the league). The league also wants the Rams to succeed, and Goodell knows the only way to make that happen is make them a winner at any costs. That pure gift against the Saints back in 2018 was really the eye opener, but it's been ongoing since. The Rams in LA are a joke....nobody really cares.

Anyways...who do the Rams draw in their bowl? The Bengals. Granted, they faced Burrow, but their coach is an afterthought, so nobody really cares as well. Even if the Rams make the Super Bowl, they ain't facing the dynasty Chiefs level type team.

Again, McVay is a very good HC....he's simply proven he's not as good as Shanahan, and I couldn't care less if he lifts another SB trophy. The dude was about to tap out a few years ago.

Spot on.

With the Rams luck Drake Maye will break his foot in the game Sunday so they get a backup qb in SB either way.

Just a question. Serious question.

what has McVay done to simply prove he's not as good as shanahan?

just trying to understand that concept. It's so fascinating to me.

There's a lot of copium in RickyRoma's post. McVay "lucked" out having to play the Bengals ? The NFL wants Mahomes to be the face of the league ? TWICE vs the same team ? (Ironically they didnt want him to be the face of that same league two other times). McVay went to a Super Bowl with Jared Goff…that's pretty much "do more with less" as it gets (cue genus post on how the Rams were ranked tops in various categories that year).

the difference is Sean McVay can get his team primed no matter the situation. Sure, Kyle "owns" him in the regular season, just like he owns all teams in the regular season. But when you have to overcome adversity, McVay is a much better option. One guy lost a 10 point lead in the playoffs 3 TIMES ! The other overcome a 10 point deficit in the 4th quarter en route to an NFCC victory.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,894
Was listening to Larry Krueger and Matt Barrows. Topic of how long this regime has before they're on the hot seat. Barrows said this year Kyle and Shanahan get a pass bc of what happened with injuries etc. But both guys implied Kyle has a couple more seasons to bring a SB or he might be out. Krueger was right. We have 4 likely HOFers on the roster (Kittle, Trent, CMC, Warner) and no hardware to show for it.

As I said, the chinks in the armor are starting to show.
T minus 2 seasons before Kyle is shown the door and the Quest for six begins
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
You guys are hilarious. Anything to protect your precious.

The knock all year was that Kyle did not develop any offensive rookies. McCaffrey, a 29 year old running back with a history of injuries, who looked awful running the ball all year, would have probably benefitted from not being played so much, and would have more years on his tires if he wasnt played so much. The rookie rb would have beneffitted from playing time. The rookie wr would have benefitted from playing time. Instead, McCaffrey looked like a broken down man at the ned of the year, and the rookies lost a year of playing time.

And when Lance did'nt play the argument was "he just needs reps!"

We arent talking about that superbowl anymore. We are talking about the team going forward. Kyle had a chance to give these rookies some valuable playing time that would have benefitted them next year. Oh well.

3 out 4 teams left also have a rb by committee. Look how McVay expertly blends corim and Williams. Look how the Seahawks used Kenneth walker and charbonet. Look at the patriots with Henderson rhamondre Stevenson. Even the bears with swift and monangai. Shanahan just loves running his players into the ground. He even refused to play kittle and tonges at the same time.

Ah yes Tonges the missing peace to greatness. Just look at him in the last game and see what Kyle had us missing all year

When you have to make up stuff to complain about then you know there isn't a real argument here.

Acting like Jordan James and Jordan Watkins are Michael Jordan's of the NFL and Kyle is just holding them back 🤦‍♂?.

They're both day 3 rookies. James 2 guys down the depth chart, after starting the year being 3 guys down the depth chart. Watkins got injured in preseason then kept getting injured missing critical development time.

Jordan James wasn't going to save our season and RB is the easiest position to transition from college to the pros. Watkins I would've liked to see play over Bourne but clearly he wasn't showing enough in practice to merit serious paying time and it's not like Bourne was heavily featured by the time Watkins was healthy again.

Faster and younger doesn't guarantee they're ready to contribute or contribute in a major way. Find something else to complain about.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
You guys are hilarious. Anything to protect your precious.

The knock all year was that Kyle did not develop any offensive rookies. McCaffrey, a 29 year old running back with a history of injuries, who looked awful running the ball all year, would have probably benefitted from not being played so much, and would have more years on his tires if he wasnt played so much. The rookie rb would have beneffitted from playing time. The rookie wr would have benefitted from playing time. Instead, McCaffrey looked like a broken down man at the ned of the year, and the rookies lost a year of playing time.

And when Lance did'nt play the argument was "he just needs reps!"

We arent talking about that superbowl anymore. We are talking about the team going forward. Kyle had a chance to give these rookies some valuable playing time that would have benefitted them next year. Oh well.

3 out 4 teams left also have a rb by committee. Look how McVay expertly blends corim and Williams. Look how the Seahawks used Kenneth walker and charbonet. Look at the patriots with Henderson rhamondre Stevenson. Even the bears with swift and monangai. Shanahan just loves running his players into the ground. He even refused to play kittle and tonges at the same time.

Ah yes Tonges the missing peace to greatness. Just look at him in the last game and see what Kyle had us missing all year

When you have to make up stuff to complain about then you know there isn't a real argument here.

Acting like Jordan James and Jordan Watkins are Michael Jordan's of the NFL and Kyle is just holding them back 🤦‍♂?.

They're both day 3 rookies. James 2 guys down the depth chart, after starting the year being 3 guys down the depth chart. Watkins got injured in preseason then kept getting injured missing critical development time.

Jordan James wasn't going to save our season and RB is the easiest position to transition from college to the pros. Watkins I would've liked to see play over Bourne but clearly he wasn't showing enough in practice to merit serious paying time and it's not like Bourne was heavily featured by the time Watkins was healthy again.

Faster and younger doesn't guarantee they're ready to contribute or contribute in a major way. Find something else to complain about.

I'm not sure that's exactly what he was saying. While I don't have the same, unrelenting issues with Kyle that some people do, I do wonder about some of the choices he's made. For instance, I get that McCaffery is a unique player, and Kyle puts a lot of trust in him, but 400+ touches? I mean, there are other backs on the team. If Kyle doesn't thrust them to get the job done, then why are they there?

He said Jordan James had been ready to play the last six weeks of the season but that there was "no room" for him on the gameday roster. Why, so he could have Robinson and Guerendo up, who he rarely ever used as actual RBs? Then there was the whole circus around the WR position, I know injuries played a part in how that all played out, but still. Demarcus Robinson had one significant game statistically, Bourne had two and they were important games, I'll grant that, but in a year they went into thinking it would be important to develop their rookies and young players hardly any of them really got a chance outside of a few,

It was really just Stout, West, Collins and Williams, until he got hurt. Sigle had a chance and looked pretty good early on, got benched for eight weeks, then came back and looked pretty good again. Why not give him the opportunity to learn through his mistakes the way Stout did? It's not like the safeties they had back there were world beaters.

I think the point about Tonges is that he showed he had excellent hands and was a legitimate receiving option, but he really only played when George was out. while down the freeway Mckay was doing some interesting things with three TE sets. Given all of our issues at the receiving position this year, it seemed, looking in from the outside, that there might be some opportunities to utilize his receiving skills in more innovative ways with both he and George on the field together, but that never really happened. It doesn't mean that Tonges would have altered the course of the season, just that it would have given defenses another thing to think about.

I guess my last gripe would be about Sebastian Valdez. They brought him up a few times to reward him for his work on the scout team, but they never played him, why? As bad as their interior pass rush was this year, it seems like they would have been interested in seeing what he could do. My only thought is that they like his upside enough that they didn't want to put him in a position to be poached off the practice squad if he got out there and showed what he could do. Not saying that's the case, it's just a thought.

This administration has a lot to answer for in terms of questionable draft picks, bad free agent signings, and the slow pace at which they develop rookies. But, in spite of all that, they have found a way to keep the team competitive. However, both Seattle and LA seem to have taken significant steps forward so it will be incumbent upon Kyle and Lynch to show they can improve the roster enough to keep up. Go Niners!
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
You guys are hilarious. Anything to protect your precious.

The knock all year was that Kyle did not develop any offensive rookies. McCaffrey, a 29 year old running back with a history of injuries, who looked awful running the ball all year, would have probably benefitted from not being played so much, and would have more years on his tires if he wasnt played so much. The rookie rb would have beneffitted from playing time. The rookie wr would have benefitted from playing time. Instead, McCaffrey looked like a broken down man at the ned of the year, and the rookies lost a year of playing time.

And when Lance did'nt play the argument was "he just needs reps!"

We arent talking about that superbowl anymore. We are talking about the team going forward. Kyle had a chance to give these rookies some valuable playing time that would have benefitted them next year. Oh well.

3 out 4 teams left also have a rb by committee. Look how McVay expertly blends corim and Williams. Look how the Seahawks used Kenneth walker and charbonet. Look at the patriots with Henderson rhamondre Stevenson. Even the bears with swift and monangai. Shanahan just loves running his players into the ground. He even refused to play kittle and tonges at the same time.

Ah yes Tonges the missing peace to greatness. Just look at him in the last game and see what Kyle had us missing all year

When you have to make up stuff to complain about then you know there isn't a real argument here.

Acting like Jordan James and Jordan Watkins are Michael Jordan's of the NFL and Kyle is just holding them back 🤦‍♂?.

They're both day 3 rookies. James 2 guys down the depth chart, after starting the year being 3 guys down the depth chart. Watkins got injured in preseason then kept getting injured missing critical development time.

Jordan James wasn't going to save our season and RB is the easiest position to transition from college to the pros. Watkins I would've liked to see play over Bourne but clearly he wasn't showing enough in practice to merit serious paying time and it's not like Bourne was heavily featured by the time Watkins was healthy again.

Faster and younger doesn't guarantee they're ready to contribute or contribute in a major way. Find something else to complain about.

I'm not sure that's exactly what he was saying. While I don't have the same, unrelenting issues with Kyle that some people do, I do wonder about some of the choices he's made. For instance, I get that McCaffery is a unique player, and Kyle puts a lot of trust in him, but 400+ touches? I mean, there are other backs on the team. If Kyle doesn't thrust them to get the job done, then why are they there?

He said Jordan James had been ready to play the last six weeks of the season but that there was "no room" for him on the gameday roster. Why, so he could have Robinson and Guerendo up, who he rarely ever used as actual RBs? Then there was the whole circus around the WR position, I know injuries played a part in how that all played out, but still. Demarcus Robinson had one significant game statistically, Bourne had two and they were important games, I'll grant that, but in a year they went into thinking it would be important to develop their rookies and young players hardly any of them really got a chance outside of a few,

It was really just Stout, West, Collins and Williams, until he got hurt. Sigle had a chance and looked pretty good early on, got benched for eight weeks, then came back and looked pretty good again. Why not give him the opportunity to learn through his mistakes the way Stout did? It's not like the safeties they had back there were world beaters.

I think the point about Tonges is that he showed he had excellent hands and was a legitimate receiving option, but he really only played when George was out. while down the freeway Mckay was doing some interesting things with three TE sets. Given all of our issues at the receiving position this year, it seemed, looking in from the outside, that there might be some opportunities to utilize his receiving skills in more innovative ways with both he and George on the field together, but that never really happened. It doesn't mean that Tonges would have altered the course of the season, just that it would have given defenses another thing to think about.

I guess my last gripe would be about Sebastian Valdez. They brought him up a few times to reward him for his work on the scout team, but they never played him, why? As bad as their interior pass rush was this year, it seems like they would have been interested in seeing what he could do. My only thought is that they like his upside enough that they didn't want to put him in a position to be poached off the practice squad if he got out there and showed what he could do. Not saying that's the case, it's just a thought.

This administration has a lot to answer for in terms of questionable draft picks, bad free agent signings, and the slow pace at which they develop rookies. But, in spite of all that, they have found a way to keep the team competitive. However, both Seattle and LA seem to have taken significant steps forward so it will be incumbent upon Kyle and Lynch to show they can improve the roster enough to keep up. Go Niners!

I couldn't have said it better myself.
Jed York runs this franchise not you fans. Kyle and Lynch will be here another ten years if not just Kyle himself. I'm putting my
owners cap on and I'm not letting go of a good thing because I have impatient fans. We just won 13 games with a MASH unit on the field all season and as an owner I've got half the league looking to raid my coaches and front office personnel as an affirmation of what I've built my club up to be
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Jed York runs this franchise not you fans. Kyle and Lynch will be here another ten years if not just Kyle himself. I'm putting my
owners cap on and I'm not letting go of a good thing because I have impatient fans. We just won 13 games with a MASH unit on the field all season and as an owner I've got half the league looking to raid my coaches and front office personnel as an affirmation of what I've built my club up to be

Impatient.

30+ years since our last Super Bowl. 20+ years with this owner. 9 years with shanahan. No rings.

pretty impatient.
Originally posted by DrEll:
There's a lot of copium in RickyRoma's post. McVay "lucked" out having to play the Bengals ? The NFL wants Mahomes to be the face of the league ? TWICE vs the same team ? (Ironically they didnt want him to be the face of that same league two other times). McVay went to a Super Bowl with Jared Goff…that's pretty much "do more with less" as it gets (cue genus post on how the Rams were ranked tops in various categories that year).

the difference is Sean McVay can get his team primed no matter the situation. Sure, Kyle "owns" him in the regular season, just like he owns all teams in the regular season. But when you have to overcome adversity, McVay is a much better option. One guy lost a 10 point lead in the playoffs 3 TIMES ! The other overcome a 10 point deficit in the 4th quarter en route to an NFCC victory.

I think you meant "cue genus with facts which I like to ignore to make my grandiose trash takes"

Let's just bury our heads in the sand and make up things like a #1 overall pick is somehow doing more with less.

Let's forget they were a juggernaut of an offense that season and that the only reason they even won the NFCCG was because of an egregious PI not called against them which would've won the game for the Saints.

I'm sorry when facts come into play your ridiculous takes fall apart. Maybe a reason why that continues to happen to you?

Whether you want to call Ricky's post copium or not doesn't change the fact that he's right in what he said. That Bengals team was smoke, mirrors and Joe Burrow. Terrible OL that Joe kept overcoming until he no longer could vs a great pass rush of the Rams super team.

A superteam who was lucky enough not to have to go and play the NFCCG in fridgid GB thanks to Kyle Shanahan and the 49ers. Thanks in part due Tartt dropping an easy pick, thanks in part due to the 49ers being unable to convert a 2nd and 1/3rd and 2 while having Elijah Mitchell as their top RB and missing their dominant run blocking RT and facing a broken down Jimmy G.

We'll see how he does tomorrow. Ironically I'll be rooting for him to win that game cuz I hate Seahawk fans.
Originally posted by 49ers81:
I'm not sure that's exactly what he was saying. While I don't have the same, unrelenting issues with Kyle that some people do, I do wonder about some of the choices he's made. For instance, I get that McCaffery is a unique player, and Kyle puts a lot of trust in him, but 400+ touches? I mean, there are other backs on the team. If Kyle doesn't thrust them to get the job done, then why are they there?

He said Jordan James had been ready to play the last six weeks of the season but that there was "no room" for him on the gameday roster. Why, so he could have Robinson and Guerendo up, who he rarely ever used as actual RBs? Then there was the whole circus around the WR position, I know injuries played a part in how that all played out, but still. Demarcus Robinson had one significant game statistically, Bourne had two and they were important games, I'll grant that, but in a year they went into thinking it would be important to develop their rookies and young players hardly any of them really got a chance outside of a few,

It was really just Stout, West, Collins and Williams, until he got hurt. Sigle had a chance and looked pretty good early on, got benched for eight weeks, then came back and looked pretty good again. Why not give him the opportunity to learn through his mistakes the way Stout did? It's not like the safeties they had back there were world beaters.

I think the point about Tonges is that he showed he had excellent hands and was a legitimate receiving option, but he really only played when George was out. while down the freeway Mckay was doing some interesting things with three TE sets. Given all of our issues at the receiving position this year, it seemed, looking in from the outside, that there might be some opportunities to utilize his receiving skills in more innovative ways with both he and George on the field together, but that never really happened. It doesn't mean that Tonges would have altered the course of the season, just that it would have given defenses another thing to think about.

I guess my last gripe would be about Sebastian Valdez. They brought him up a few times to reward him for his work on the scout team, but they never played him, why? As bad as their interior pass rush was this year, it seems like they would have been interested in seeing what he could do. My only thought is that they like his upside enough that they didn't want to put him in a position to be poached off the practice squad if he got out there and showed what he could do. Not saying that's the case, it's just a thought.

This administration has a lot to answer for in terms of questionable draft picks, bad free agent signings, and the slow pace at which they develop rookies. But, in spite of all that, they have found a way to keep the team competitive. However, both Seattle and LA seem to have taken significant steps forward so it will be incumbent upon Kyle and Lynch to show they can improve the roster enough to keep up. Go Niners!

It's easy to assume the young unknowns are somehow hidden talents and guys who would automatically be great when given an opportunity. Maybe they would. There is certainly something there cuz we've seen guys come up and play great - Jordan Mason is a great example.

However it doesn't always work like that. Sometimes guys are down on the depth chart for a reason. Jordan James btw was active…and the reason why is because of depth. Need those guys if guys ahead get injured. You know this.

I do agree that Kyle needs to let guys play sometime cuz there are guys who are simply gamers - show up in games but maybe don't practice the same way but I also understand him expecting a certain level from the players. You want gamers but you don't want to set bad practice habits either. You want guys giving 100% in practice then translating it to the games. Looking past bad practice habits hurts the team overall. Before Aiyuk flaked on us he spoke how Kyle teaching him that lesson was critical in him taking the next step at WR.

It's a tough line you have to walk as a coach.
Originally posted by 49ers81:
I'm not sure that's exactly what he was saying. While I don't have the same, unrelenting issues with Kyle that some people do, I do wonder about some of the choices he's made. For instance, I get that McCaffery is a unique player, and Kyle puts a lot of trust in him, but 400+ touches? I mean, there are other backs on the team. If Kyle doesn't thrust them to get the job done, then why are they there?

He said Jordan James had been ready to play the last six weeks of the season but that there was "no room" for him on the gameday roster. Why, so he could have Robinson and Guerendo up, who he rarely ever used as actual RBs? Then there was the whole circus around the WR position, I know injuries played a part in how that all played out, but still. Demarcus Robinson had one significant game statistically, Bourne had two and they were important games, I'll grant that, but in a year they went into thinking it would be important to develop their rookies and young players hardly any of them really got a chance outside of a few,

It was really just Stout, West, Collins and Williams, until he got hurt. Sigle had a chance and looked pretty good early on, got benched for eight weeks, then came back and looked pretty good again. Why not give him the opportunity to learn through his mistakes the way Stout did? It's not like the safeties they had back there were world beaters.

I think the point about Tonges is that he showed he had excellent hands and was a legitimate receiving option, but he really only played when George was out. while down the freeway Mckay was doing some interesting things with three TE sets. Given all of our issues at the receiving position this year, it seemed, looking in from the outside, that there might be some opportunities to utilize his receiving skills in more innovative ways with both he and George on the field together, but that never really happened. It doesn't mean that Tonges would have altered the course of the season, just that it would have given defenses another thing to think about.

I guess my last gripe would be about Sebastian Valdez. They brought him up a few times to reward him for his work on the scout team, but they never played him, why? As bad as their interior pass rush was this year, it seems like they would have been interested in seeing what he could do. My only thought is that they like his upside enough that they didn't want to put him in a position to be poached off the practice squad if he got out there and showed what he could do. Not saying that's the case, it's just a thought.

This administration has a lot to answer for in terms of questionable draft picks, bad free agent signings, and the slow pace at which they develop rookies. But, in spite of all that, they have found a way to keep the team competitive. However, both Seattle and LA seem to have taken significant steps forward so it will be incumbent upon Kyle and Lynch to show they can improve the roster enough to keep up. Go Niners!

I love all of this. I love Kyle but your post is really the only thing that irks me. Roster usage. Your examples are spot on
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,894
Originally posted by 49ers81:
I'm not sure that's exactly what he was saying. While I don't have the same, unrelenting issues with Kyle that some people do, I do wonder about some of the choices he's made. For instance, I get that McCaffery is a unique player, and Kyle puts a lot of trust in him, but 400+ touches? I mean, there are other backs on the team. If Kyle doesn't thrust them to get the job done, then why are they there?

He said Jordan James had been ready to play the last six weeks of the season but that there was "no room" for him on the gameday roster. Why, so he could have Robinson and Guerendo up, who he rarely ever used as actual RBs? Then there was the whole circus around the WR position, I know injuries played a part in how that all played out, but still. Demarcus Robinson had one significant game statistically, Bourne had two and they were important games, I'll grant that, but in a year they went into thinking it would be important to develop their rookies and young players hardly any of them really got a chance outside of a few,

It was really just Stout, West, Collins and Williams, until he got hurt. Sigle had a chance and looked pretty good early on, got benched for eight weeks, then came back and looked pretty good again. Why not give him the opportunity to learn through his mistakes the way Stout did? It's not like the safeties they had back there were world beaters.

I think the point about Tonges is that he showed he had excellent hands and was a legitimate receiving option, but he really only played when George was out. while down the freeway Mckay was doing some interesting things with three TE sets. Given all of our issues at the receiving position this year, it seemed, looking in from the outside, that there might be some opportunities to utilize his receiving skills in more innovative ways with both he and George on the field together, but that never really happened. It doesn't mean that Tonges would have altered the course of the season, just that it would have given defenses another thing to think about.

I guess my last gripe would be about Sebastian Valdez. They brought him up a few times to reward him for his work on the scout team, but they never played him, why? As bad as their interior pass rush was this year, it seems like they would have been interested in seeing what he could do. My only thought is that they like his upside enough that they didn't want to put him in a position to be poached off the practice squad if he got out there and showed what he could do. Not saying that's the case, it's just a thought.

This administration has a lot to answer for in terms of questionable draft picks, bad free agent signings, and the slow pace at which they develop rookies. But, in spite of all that, they have found a way to keep the team competitive. However, both Seattle and LA seem to have taken significant steps forward so it will be incumbent upon Kyle and Lynch to show they can improve the roster enough to keep up. Go Niners!

Great post. They asks Kyle at the final press conference about Jordan Watkins and not getting him play time. Kyle said that he was missing in camp that was a setback. Then when he returned, he had a conditioning issue, so that was another setback. But then he was ready by the time the Titans game came around, but he just didn't make the cut and was moved down the depth chart. And I'm thinking wait…you had Malik Turner who hasn't had a catch in 5 years who is playing the position and has no future on this team taking snaps, but your 4.3 WR who can maybe stretch the field and could use the reps to tune up for 2026 isn't good enough on the depth chart ?!

Kyle definitely has some kind of a "thing" with rookies particularly on the offensive side of the ball. Unless they are his hand picked guys like Deebo, he doesn't give youngsters like Jordan James and Jordan Watkins a chance to play. How much further along would those guys be if they had gotten valuable reps this season ? 2026 in essence becomes their real rookie season.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,894
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Pillbusta:
Jed York runs this franchise not you fans. Kyle and Lynch will be here another ten years if not just Kyle himself. I'm putting my
owners cap on and I'm not letting go of a good thing because I have impatient fans. We just won 13 games with a MASH unit on the field all season and as an owner I've got half the league looking to raid my coaches and front office personnel as an affirmation of what I've built my club up to be

Impatient.

30+ years since our last Super Bowl. 20+ years with this owner. 9 years with shanahan. No rings.

pretty impatient.

Something tells me we could go another 10 years without a ring, and Pillbusta would post the same thing…
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,894
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
There's a lot of copium in RickyRoma's post. McVay "lucked" out having to play the Bengals ? The NFL wants Mahomes to be the face of the league ? TWICE vs the same team ? (Ironically they didnt want him to be the face of that same league two other times). McVay went to a Super Bowl with Jared Goff…that's pretty much "do more with less" as it gets (cue genus post on how the Rams were ranked tops in various categories that year).

the difference is Sean McVay can get his team primed no matter the situation. Sure, Kyle "owns" him in the regular season, just like he owns all teams in the regular season. But when you have to overcome adversity, McVay is a much better option. One guy lost a 10 point lead in the playoffs 3 TIMES ! The other overcome a 10 point deficit in the 4th quarter en route to an NFCC victory.

I think you meant "cue genus with facts which I like to ignore to make my grandiose trash takes"

Let's just bury our heads in the sand and make up things like a #1 overall pick is somehow doing more with less.

Let's forget they were a juggernaut of an offense that season and that the only reason they even won the NFCCG was because of an egregious PI not called against them which would've won the game for the Saints.

I'm sorry when facts come into play your ridiculous takes fall apart. Maybe a reason why that continues to happen to you?

Whether you want to call Ricky's post copium or not doesn't change the fact that he's right in what he said. That Bengals team was smoke, mirrors and Joe Burrow. Terrible OL that Joe kept overcoming until he no longer could vs a great pass rush of the Rams super team.

A superteam who was lucky enough not to have to go and play the NFCCG in fridgid GB thanks to Kyle Shanahan and the 49ers. Thanks in part due Tartt dropping an easy pick, thanks in part due to the 49ers being unable to convert a 2nd and 1/3rd and 2 while having Elijah Mitchell as their top RB and missing their dominant run blocking RT and facing a broken down Jimmy G.

We'll see how he does tomorrow. Ironically I'll be rooting for him to win that game cuz I hate Seahawk fans.

The smoke and mirrors team that beat the mighty Chiefs? The team you guys feel had the fortune (and we had the misfortune) of facing twice in the SB in a losing effort ? Give me a break dude. Your theory falls apart when you see Joe Burrow going into Arrowhead and knocking out the defending AFC champions….
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone