There are 478 users in the forums

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by DrEll:
Do you take away from Bill Walsh's greatness because he had Joe Montana ? I get it. It's hard to cope when there's a guy in your own division, let alone the league, that has a higher rank than you.

it is what it is…

The fact that you went there shows how illogical your points are.

Bill Walsh drafted Joe Montana in the 3rd round. He coached him up all the way and then reaped the rewards of the QB and HC combo to great rewards.

McVay hasn't drafted a QB to coach up. He took the team over with Goff there and when he realized he couldn't get it done with Goff had to bring in a guy like Stafford because his coaching alone wasn't good enough. He needed a guy who could make a no look pass into razor thin windows.

That's what you fail to understand.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Nah. I don't like or support the Rams. But I do respect them. What McVay has done for that franchise even with a mini rebuild is remarkable. It's a good blueprint to follow. You guys get upset bc he is what we wanted Shanahan to be. So it irks you guys when he's successful while Kyle puts up 3 points in the biggest game if the season.

Cue the excuses in 3….2….1…

McVay has never put up 3 points in the biggest game of the season. Why hes so amazing.

Ell going to answer? Or is he going to continue to avoid/ignore.

Ok let's repeat this slowly. Sean McVay has a Super Bowl ring. He put up 3 points, took the hit, went out and wooed a future HOF QB and went on to win a Super Bowl.

Kyle Shanahan lost a Super Bowl where he was up by 10 points half way through the 4th. He took th hit, went out and traded 3 FIRST ROUND picks for Trey Lance, only to find out he's a bust. Oh, and then he lost another Super Bowl.

See the difference ? Or are you still enamored with Kyle's regular season 10-5 record vs McVay ?

So what you are telling me McVay needed a HOF caliber QB to be able to win a SB.

That McVays offense is incapable of scoring more than 3 points in the biggest of games without a HOF caliber QB.

And McVay has never proven he can win the biggest of games against top tier coaches like Andy Reid and Bill Belichick.

I don't care if he needed Joe Montana reincarnated to win a SB. The fact is that he won one. He identified the glitch in the Matrix, then went out and recruited the best possible player to fix that glitch. There's no such thing as "well my SB ring is better than yours bc you got it with a HOF QB and I got one with a scrub".

And second, McVay could win a ring against a group of baboons and it still counts as a SB win.

lol you guys can't help yourselves. Just to prop Shanny up, you'll drag anyone down. McVay has a done a better job building the Rams than Kyle has. He has the hardware to prove it. /debate.

BRAH, why u think I call them Shannanigans ??

No move or decision by Shanny will ever be wrong... just like Shanny, they will find a way to point the finger away from Shanny...

I can no longer wonder, I am more convince now than ever that these Shannanigans rather have Shanny as the HC than get a Super Bowl ring NOT coached by Shanny.
Originally posted by pdc20:
Stop posting your nonsense seriously.
The team was 12-5 with almost everyone injured. The defense was decimated. The starting QB played 9 games.
There's a big game at Philly Sunday.
And you're talking like the Niners are in the same situation as 10 years ago when they had just fired Jim Tomsula.
Can you please stop being a fortywhiner for just a week?
Why don't you go back to RamsWebzone and laugh with your friends about how dysfunctional the Niners are right?

12-5... and the only memory EVERY FANS IN THE NFL about the almost UNDEFEATED season of the Patriots is the Super Bowl LOSS !!
Originally posted by 9moon:
BRAH, why u think I call them Shannanigans ??

No move or decision by Shanny will ever be wrong... just like Shanny, they will find a way to point the finger away from Shanny...

I can no longer wonder, I am more convince now than ever that these Shannanigans rather have Shanny as the HC than get a Super Bowl ring NOT coached by Shanny.

Once again all you guys have are these ridiculous hyperbole laced takes that nobody has ever said.

What you can't seem to grasp is most people believe the odds of getting a SB are better with Kyle Shanahan than unknown future HC possibilities.

How many SBs did we win after Seifert through Shanahan?

If you can guarantee me we win a SB with whomever takes over for Shanahan then i'll say fire him right now.

But none of you can guarantee it. So deal in reality.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Originally posted by genus49:
Dak Prescott has never seen a conference title. If you're going to put so much emphasis on winning then at least be consistent with the analogies.

Kyle Shanahan is in year 9 as a HC.
Dan Marino played for 17 seasons as a QB.

Kyle Shanahan can coach a lot longer than Marino was able to play QB.

If you want to make the QB to HC analogy then accomplishment wise he's a lot close to Marino than Prescott.

Will Shanahan still be considered a great coach if he doesn't win a SB after 17 years?

It depends on circumstances. If he's constantly getting to conference games and SBs but losing to other elite QBs/HCs or with teams decimated by injury then I'm sure a lot of people will consider him great because most people can think rationally and understand that one game doesn't define a coach who can't control the players on the team doing their job.

Is Doug Pederson a better HC cuz he beat Belichick in the SB?
Is Tom Coughlin a better HC?

Is Doug Pederson a better HC cuz he beat Belichick in the SB? - NOT at all

Is Tom Coughlin a better HC? - SOME may argue

Do YOU think Marv Levy was a better HC than Kyle ?
Do YOU think Daddy Shanny was a better HC than Kyle?
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Marino is a consensus top 10 QB of all time even without a SB win.

Shanahans not even in the same ballpark.

Prescotts an okay game manager QB. You can win games with him with a good stacked roster. He's a franchise QB.

The reality is shanahans basically the same. This year was his best year coaching. He actually won games he shouldn't have because this teams a pretender that should have been like 6-11, however, Saleh pulled out a ton of the wins this year making adjustments in the second half allowing the offense to average like 20 pts a game and win. He gets some credit for bringing him in.

The niners had an easy schedule. The SB niners rosters were stacked. Part of that's just getting bosa. Lately the drafts have been pretty mediocre outside minor bright spots.

There's not much to look forward to going forward though and that's why 9 years in he's just a good but not great coach.

You guys need to understand. The 49ers aren't the Seahawks. There's not going to be a light bulb moment next year with bosa back, mcaffrey a year older, Trent a year older etc... we are more like the warriors. An aging dynasty that keeps trying to hold on thinking these dudes are going to turn back time...

Basically already at the purging point where you have to turn the roster again. Ie rebuild 2-3 years before were SB contenders again. This year was wide open. Injuries ruined it so now we're talking 12-13 years of shanahan before maybe having another SB chance if they draft good.

The QB to HC analogies were made to try to reason with some of you guys...clearly it still failed. The whole point was one game, even if it's the SB shouldn't overshadow a vast resume.

As for the rest of your post I find it laughable that you give credit to Saleh and then put in the little "he gets some credit for bringing him in" does he? Do we need to go back to 2018 Saleh thread days? Cuz it was probably like 80% FIRE SALEH!!!

Shanahan brought him in with no coordinator experience and stuck with him. Saleh owes just as much to Kyle as Kyle owes to him this season, if not more. Shanahan identified two great coordinators in Saleh and Demeco. Unfortunately due to being right on them he lost them at one of the most critical times. I have 0 doubt that if Saleh or Demeco were coaching defense for us in 2023 we win that SB. Heck if they were just coaching in OT for us.

But I love when you guys pick and choose when to credit the other coordinators. Don't see you blaming Wilks for the SB loss. And I would certainly say Kyle's offense when healthy was more than able to carry their weight this season. Saleh was brought in for big $ and allowed to run the defense as he saw fit. The moves we made were ok'd by him and he clearly had majority say in the draft.

As for the 49ers not being the Seahawks...ok? What light bulb moment did Seattle have exactly? They were a 9-8 team in Pete Carroll's last season. They were never terrible. They got lucky to trade away Russell Wilson before he collapsed and received a major haul for him. Got even more lucky in 2024 when the draft shook out the way it did(Rams as well) with the first half of the first round being all offense with Seattle and Rams both needing help on defense.

Clearly where we fall to the back is in the front office department and I will agree there. It has to improve. We're having a tough time letting vets go at the right moment. The only guy we allowed to leave was Buckner and we blew that pick with Kinlaw. The other guys we can't seem to get value for them. Deebo tailed off and walked for peanuts. Aiyuk totally f'd us and we'll be lucky to get anything for him.

Kyle and John simply haven't been able to get that type of trade where we move a piece for a big return to infuse lots of talent onto the roster. Having said that we're not behind Seattle because of their QB situation. Seahawk and Ram fans know if our team wasn't beat to a pulp missing key pieces on both sides of the ball we're hosting the playoffs at Levis.

The team is older yes, we have some glaring holes to fill and god forbid one of our heavy hitters retire. But I still trust Shanahan to keep the team winning because he's shown the ability to do that.

What worries me is our drafting...specifically with Kyle pulling the strings early and I talked about it. THAT to me is a legit conversation. Not Kyle's coaching.

There's really not much to talk about Shanny's drafting ability... it's been a C- all along.. he continues to show that he has know FEEL for talent, instead, he looks for players that can run certain plays of his instead of players that will become very good.
Originally posted by 9moon:
Is Doug Pederson a better HC cuz he beat Belichick in the SB? - NOT at all

Is Tom Coughlin a better HC? - SOME may argue

Do YOU think Marv Levy was a better HC than Kyle ?
Do YOU think Daddy Shanny was a better HC than Kyle?

What the f**k are you babbling on about.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Arm was special. So was Jamarus Russel. Milton, Kap, Vick etc….That system he was in was not conducive to NFL offenses at the time. s**t load of backyard football, pretty big projection.

There was some back yard ball for sure. I cant speak to what you saw in comparison to the guys you named but I can assure my take away from Mahomes was clearly different than yours. Those guys was not in the same realm throwing the football in my eyes.

NY, honest brah... did you even watch games of Jamarcus, Milton, Kap and Vick in college ??

those bazooka arms of theirs are god given, but they are not REAL QBs when I saw them in college.. KAP, brah, he can't event complete a slant !! dude a pitcher !!

You guys can do this hindsight scouting all you want. The reality is Mahomes himself will tell you he wasn't ready for Kyle's system. Hell he wasn't ready for Andy.

This is what you guys fail to acknowledge. Andy Reid was a tenured HC whose team was stuck in the mud.

Andy was a 19 year HC who hadn't won a SB. In his 4 seasons with KC he made the playoffs 3 out of 4 times but only won 1 playoff game.

Heading into that 2017 draft the Chiefs were coming off a 12-4 season where they lost at home after a bye week 16-18. Alex Smith was a good QB for them but he was the Alex Smith we knew. Safe, consistent but won't take you to the next level.

After failing to get his chosen QB of the future in Paxton Lynch(thanks Denver for consistently f'ing us with bad QB moves) his front office convinced him to go in on Mahomes.

Mahomes had Alex Smith to show him how to be an NFL QB, something Patrick talked about a LOT and himself said if he had to start right away he wouldn't be where he is now. And he also talked about how he didn't learn to read defenses until midway into year 3 in 2019(how lucky for us again...)

Meanwhile Kyle Shanahan was brought in to be a first time HC here. He was brought in for his system. We had Brian Hoyer as our vet QB.

So what you guys are expecting is Shanahan in his first HC opportunity take a chance on a guy who HIMSELF said he wasn't NFL ready. Take him #2 or #3 overall, let Brian Hoyer mentor him and expect him to do well in Kyle Shanahan's system which requires the ability to read a defense, throw with anticipation and play within structure?

That sounds like a smart move to you? Oh that's right Kyle should've changed his system...which he was hired for cuz Mahomes was a rare prospect which is why several QB needy teams passed on him and the NFL world was shocked when KC took him as early as they did.

Logical as always...

LOGIC AS ALWAYS?

Why don't you use YOUR logic as to why Shanny took a much younger Lance and why he did not want to take a chance on a QB he called a " Freak of Nature "..
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Ok let's repeat this slowly. Sean McVay has a Super Bowl ring. He put up 3 points, took the hit, went out and wooed a future HOF QB and went on to win a Super Bowl.

Kyle Shanahan lost a Super Bowl where he was up by 10 points half way through the 4th. He took th hit, went out and traded 3 FIRST ROUND picks for Trey Lance, only to find out he's a bust. Oh, and then he lost another Super Bowl.

See the difference ? Or are you still enamored with Kyle's regular season 10-5 record vs McVay ?

I know you don't have much to work with when pressed for logic and facts so you have to reach like this but giving a HC credit for a move like that is pure cope.

McVay was handed a #1 overall QB who after being the #2 overall offense the whole season managed to score 3 on the Patriots who weren't even a juggernaut of a defense. McVay was simply outcoached in a major way. He admitted it.

Yet to you that's not an issue because the Genius that is McVay simply decided - let's go get Matt Stafford and "wooed" him. And boom he got it done cuz he's just the best.

Or...how about reality comes in and says that they had a simple relationship from run ins before and McVay being friends with Stafford's brother in law. The biggest factor in that trade going down for the Rams was Stafford wanted out, Lions wanted to start fresh and their GM came from the Rams front office and was a big fan of Jared Goff.

Everything that you've posted trying to claim Kyle Shanahan blew the opportunity to get Stafford actually showed the Lions were not serious about trading with SF. It's no different than saying the nerd in HS didn't get to take the most popular girl in school to the prom because he didn't try hard enough. Sometimes it's just not going to happen.

But back in reality one other thing you like to ignore was Kyle tried to trade for Aaron Rodgers. They called before moving up to #3 overall and they tried again right before the draft and even tried to get Aaron to push things from his side. It soured a close relationship he had with Matt LaFleur.

So Kyle most certainly tried to get a QB like Stafford. Difference was GB wasn't willing to offload a stud QB. The Lions were.

Giving McVay credit for that to up his value as a HC is just as irrational as your theory that somehow losing in the SB is worse than not making it at all.

This is getting old. As we've established McVay was with Stafford and his wife eating dinner having contract talks while Kyle was getting some beauty rest. His friend told him that he needs to talk to Stafford NOW and he went to bed instead. Few months later traded 3 FIRST ROUND PICKS FOR A BUST !

THIS !!

... and I've already stated the fact Shanny rather lose a Super Bowl with his hand picked QBs that he's not ALL IN than WIN one w/a future HOF QB that will get majority of the credit.
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
Marino is a consensus top 10 QB of all time even without a SB win.

Shanahans not even in the same ballpark.

Prescotts an okay game manager QB. You can win games with him with a good stacked roster. He's a franchise QB.

The reality is shanahans basically the same. This year was his best year coaching. He actually won games he shouldn't have because this teams a pretender that should have been like 6-11, however, Saleh pulled out a ton of the wins this year making adjustments in the second half allowing the offense to average like 20 pts a game and win. He gets some credit for bringing him in.

The niners had an easy schedule. The SB niners rosters were stacked. Part of that's just getting bosa. Lately the drafts have been pretty mediocre outside minor bright spots.

There's not much to look forward to going forward though and that's why 9 years in he's just a good but not great coach.

You guys need to understand. The 49ers aren't the Seahawks. There's not going to be a light bulb moment next year with bosa back, mcaffrey a year older, Trent a year older etc... we are more like the warriors. An aging dynasty that keeps trying to hold on thinking these dudes are going to turn back time...

Basically already at the purging point where you have to turn the roster again. Ie rebuild 2-3 years before were SB contenders again. This year was wide open. Injuries ruined it so now we're talking 12-13 years of shanahan before maybe having another SB chance if they draft good.

The QB to HC analogies were made to try to reason with some of you guys...clearly it still failed. The whole point was one game, even if it's the SB shouldn't overshadow a vast resume.

As for the rest of your post I find it laughable that you give credit to Saleh and then put in the little "he gets some credit for bringing him in" does he? Do we need to go back to 2018 Saleh thread days? Cuz it was probably like 80% FIRE SALEH!!!

Shanahan brought him in with no coordinator experience and stuck with him. Saleh owes just as much to Kyle as Kyle owes to him this season, if not more. Shanahan identified two great coordinators in Saleh and Demeco. Unfortunately due to being right on them he lost them at one of the most critical times. I have 0 doubt that if Saleh or Demeco were coaching defense for us in 2023 we win that SB. Heck if they were just coaching in OT for us.

But I love when you guys pick and choose when to credit the other coordinators. Don't see you blaming Wilks for the SB loss. And I would certainly say Kyle's offense when healthy was more than able to carry their weight this season. Saleh was brought in for big $ and allowed to run the defense as he saw fit. The moves we made were ok'd by him and he clearly had majority say in the draft.

As for the 49ers not being the Seahawks...ok? What light bulb moment did Seattle have exactly? They were a 9-8 team in Pete Carroll's last season. They were never terrible. They got lucky to trade away Russell Wilson before he collapsed and received a major haul for him. Got even more lucky in 2024 when the draft shook out the way it did(Rams as well) with the first half of the first round being all offense with Seattle and Rams both needing help on defense.

Clearly where we fall to the back is in the front office department and I will agree there. It has to improve. We're having a tough time letting vets go at the right moment. The only guy we allowed to leave was Buckner and we blew that pick with Kinlaw. The other guys we can't seem to get value for them. Deebo tailed off and walked for peanuts. Aiyuk totally f'd us and we'll be lucky to get anything for him.

Kyle and John simply haven't been able to get that type of trade where we move a piece for a big return to infuse lots of talent onto the roster. Having said that we're not behind Seattle because of their QB situation. Seahawk and Ram fans know if our team wasn't beat to a pulp missing key pieces on both sides of the ball we're hosting the playoffs at Levis.

The team is older yes, we have some glaring holes to fill and god forbid one of our heavy hitters retire. But I still trust Shanahan to keep the team winning because he's shown the ability to do that.

What worries me is our drafting...specifically with Kyle pulling the strings early and I talked about it. THAT to me is a legit conversation. Not Kyle's coaching.

To me it's all in the Kyle shanahan regime whether it's drafting or coaching.

On the coaching side related to the drafting side the issue is we see players show flashes (gurrendo breaking some big runs, watkins making some clutch down field catch, tonges making toe tapping insane catches from the tight end spot, Mason averaging 5 ypc slamming it hard up the middle) except shanahan can't find a way to consistently get those guys in the field.

I expect a coach that can recognize potential and find a way to integrate these guys before he's forced to.

I mean they have to know at some point that we have both the slowest wr core in the NFL and probably the slowest RB in the NFL right now...

They say they use the gps in practice and that's why yuk couldn't get back in the field. How about measuring mcaffreys acceleration since the injury? The guys obviously lost a step.

Mckivitz can't deal with a speed rusher so he needs to have a chip if anybody fast at all is on his side. That's a set in stone fact or he crumbles and gets purdy killed. Coaching needs to recognize and account for it.

They lost 3 first round picks from the lance debacle. It's only been 8 drafts so that hurts. That really hurts. More than has even been expressed here.

He's also terrible at challenging. The AJ Brown not catch was such a game breaking miss.

To me you have these critical things like the first round picks lost and the miss on the AJ Brown catch that literally are the difference between winning and losing a SB. I haven't seen much in the way of any improvement.

We are still drafting rbs and wrs high and not seeing them on the field. Find a way to get speed so purdy doesn't have to do it all.

You take purdy away and this offense is a 20 pt per game max average offense. The defense is terrible because there's not that much talent there.

It's not just one thing that makes shanahan just good enough to not win a SB. He's had chances and blown them.

His play calling is excellent. He's just not doing the little stuff to maximize his chances to win.

Some teams are going to be weaker up the middle so you need to run more up the middle and not just zone on those teams. Some teams are bad covering the tight ends so you target kittle and tonges more... Etc... you also have to have speed or it's way too much on purdy to try to throw into a minefield every game with the safeties sucked down and loaded boxes/middle all the time. You need to have a home run threat on the field.
Originally posted by 9moon:
THIS !!

... and I've already stated the fact Shanny rather lose a Super Bowl with his hand picked QBs that he's not ALL IN than WIN one w/a future HOF QB that will get majority of the credit.

You've said a lot on this board. Most of it being a bunch of bull.

Simply making up an opinion you have doesn't make something factual. Just amazing how you all love to ignore Shanahan trying to pull Aaron Rodgers away from one of his good friends in Matt LaFleur.

Literally trying to swat away any fact that shows your point as nothing but fiction.
Originally posted by 9moon:
LOGIC AS ALWAYS?

Why don't you use YOUR logic as to why Shanny took a much younger Lance and why he did not want to take a chance on a QB he called a " Freak of Nature "..

I don't even know wtf you're talking about. But if you're trying to ask why Shanahan didn't stick with Lance it's the simple fact that Brock Purdy came in and took the job.

Shanahan gave Lance every opportunity he could until an unfortunate injury took it out of his hands.
Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
To me it's all in the Kyle shanahan regime whether it's drafting or coaching.

On the coaching side related to the drafting side the issue is we see players show flashes (gurrendo breaking some big runs, watkins making some clutch down field catch, tonges making toe tapping insane catches from the tight end spot, Mason averaging 5 ypc slamming it hard up the middle) except shanahan can't find a way to consistently get those guys in the field.

I expect a coach that can recognize potential and find a way to integrate these guys before he's forced to.

I mean they have to know at some point that we have both the slowest wr core in the NFL and probably the slowest RB in the NFL right now...

They say they use the gps in practice and that's why yuk couldn't get back in the field. How about measuring mcaffreys acceleration since the injury? The guys obviously lost a step.

Mckivitz can't deal with a speed rusher so he needs to have a chip if anybody fast at all is on his side. That's a set in stone fact or he crumbles and gets purdy killed. Coaching needs to recognize and account for it.

They lost 3 first round picks from the lance debacle. It's only been 8 drafts so that hurts. That really hurts. More than has even been expressed here.

He's also terrible at challenging. The AJ Brown not catch was such a game breaking miss.

To me you have these critical things like the first round picks lost and the miss on the AJ Brown catch that literally are the difference between winning and losing a SB. I haven't seen much in the way of any improvement.

We are still drafting rbs and wrs high and not seeing them on the field. Find a way to get speed so purdy doesn't have to do it all.

You take purdy away and this offense is a 20 pt per game max average offense. The defense is terrible because there's not that much talent there.

It's not just one thing that makes shanahan just good enough to not win a SB. He's had chances and blown them.

His play calling is excellent. He's just not doing the little stuff to maximize his chances to win.

Some teams are going to be weaker up the middle so you need to run more up the middle and not just zone on those teams. Some teams are bad covering the tight ends so you target kittle and tonges more... Etc... you also have to have speed or it's way too much on purdy to try to throw into a minefield every game with the safeties sucked down and loaded boxes/middle all the time. You need to have a home run threat on the field.

I'll try to address your points as best as I can.

You list several players as guys Shanahan doesn't utilize well - all of them backups with proven players ahead of them. Taking CMC off the field for Guerendo isn't smart coaching. Maybe you get a big run from him but maybe his vision is still poor and he's dancing too much. Young players have to earn their spots or at least show they can be relied upon when given a chance. I'm rooting for Watkins to be a player but he dropped his first target. I do agree that Kyle needs to break through his distrust of young players but it's also hard to see them getting reps when the proven guys are healthy.

McKivitz has been playing very well this year. Even the best guys get beat at times. His losses unfortunately have come at critical moments so they're blown up but overall he's done very well. Our issues have been more on the outside and you can't chip every play or you become easier to defend.

Kyle is not terrible at challenging. Funny enough some of you guys praise McVay for that NFCCG win meanwhile he blew two terrible challenges in that game and lost his team two timeouts that they would've really needed had our defense or offense dont its job. The play you're talking about was to Devonta Smith and when your own players aren't yelling for a review and being confident it wasn't caught then it's not an easy challenge for the HC who is further away from the play. That play should've been overturned by the NFL offices in NY. Instead they claimed they didn't have the TV camera angle that showed it was dropped.

Also hate to break it to you but that game wasn't lost cuz of that play not being challenged. Not having any QBs to play by the 2nd half was the bigger problem...

Kyle Shanahan is trying to learn from his mistakes. But the mistakes he's made like the Lance trade hurt us. The drafts around that time hurt us. I believe we tried to draft to adjust what we were doing to help Lance and all those picks really didn't pan out. Banks was the only one who actually started for us and last year he wasn't even very good.

We are where we are so we have nowhere to go but forward. What Kyle has done this year with the rebuild, all the young players and the injuries to key players is highly impressive. If we can get back to hitting on majority of our draft picks we'll be in the hunt for the SB very quickly.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,993
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Nah. I don't like or support the Rams. But I do respect them. What McVay has done for that franchise even with a mini rebuild is remarkable. It's a good blueprint to follow. You guys get upset bc he is what we wanted Shanahan to be. So it irks you guys when he's successful while Kyle puts up 3 points in the biggest game if the season.

Cue the excuses in 3….2….1…

McVay has never put up 3 points in the biggest game of the season. Why hes so amazing.

Ell going to answer? Or is he going to continue to avoid/ignore.

Ok let's repeat this slowly. Sean McVay has a Super Bowl ring. He put up 3 points, took the hit, went out and wooed a future HOF QB and went on to win a Super Bowl.

Kyle Shanahan lost a Super Bowl where he was up by 10 points half way through the 4th. He took th hit, went out and traded 3 FIRST ROUND picks for Trey Lance, only to find out he's a bust. Oh, and then he lost another Super Bowl.

See the difference ? Or are you still enamored with Kyle's regular season 10-5 record vs McVay ?

So what you are telling me McVay needed a HOF caliber QB to be able to win a SB.

That McVays offense is incapable of scoring more than 3 points in the biggest of games without a HOF caliber QB.

And McVay has never proven he can win the biggest of games against top tier coaches like Andy Reid and Bill Belichick.

I don't care if he needed Joe Montana reincarnated to win a SB. The fact is that he won one. He identified the glitch in the Matrix, then went out and recruited the best possible player to fix that glitch. There's no such thing as "well my SB ring is better than yours bc you got it with a HOF QB and I got one with a scrub".

And second, McVay could win a ring against a group of baboons and it still counts as a SB win.

lol you guys can't help yourselves. Just to prop Shanny up, you'll drag anyone down. McVay has a done a better job building the Rams than Kyle has. He has the hardware to prove it. /debate.

But you said he is a better coach than Kyle. So here I am trying to understand how can McVay can be the better coach if his offense needs a HOF QB to be able to score more than 3 points.

The only thing I learned here is that sans HOF QB, McVay can't win the big one.

Do you take away from Bill Walsh's greatness because he had Joe Montana ? I get it. It's hard to cope when there's a guy in your own division, let alone the league, that has a higher rank than you.

it is what it is…

Im talking about McVay. You sir are the one who gave him a pass for not being able to score more than 3 points in a SB

You are the one illustrating to us all that McVay isn't good enough to win it all or even score more than 3 points in a SB without HOF caliber at QB.

Basically McVay needed a crutch to carry him, can't walk on his own. That's what your saying, your words not mine.

I mean basically going off your logic Kyle has never had a HOF caliber QB so it wouldn't be a fair to compare him to McVay unless you think it's OK to compare apples to oranges.

Who to blame ? McVay went out and got Stafford. Shanahan traded 3 first round picks for Trey Lance. Who do you think hold accountable for that trade ?
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 10,993
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
This is getting old. As we've established McVay was with Stafford and his wife eating dinner having contract talks while Kyle was getting some beauty rest. His friend told him that he needs to talk to Stafford NOW and he went to bed instead. Few months later traded 3 FIRST ROUND PICKS FOR A BUST !

You didn't establish a thing considering that's not what happened. Have you ever tried being honest with your takes?

They got together for dinner after the trade was already completed because Stafford and his wife, McVay and his wife....as well as Kyle and his wife among other NFL people were all in Cabo at the same time after the season.

You're as disingenuous as it gets around here.

He's actually right. McVay and Stafford talked before the trade. That's how he knew he wanted out of Detroit. Then the trade happened. Then the dinner. All while Kyle slept.

I don't agree with his Shanahan takes but in this instance he is correct.

He's not right. That Stafford wanted out was well known by everyone. The dinner he's talking about happened AFTER the trade happened.

Everything that was said of how it all went down shows the Lions weren't interested in negotiating with the 49ers. Painting it like Shanahan fumbled the deal is an absurd take with nothing behind it.

Proof ? Or just conjecture on your part ?
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone