Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 375 users in the forums

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by socalfan21:
Shanahan won't ever be held accountable for anything. He's going to coach here for 20 years with 10 nfc championship appearances and zero super bowls and zero care for the offensive line. He's on track for something special.

I don't believe Kyle has 0 care about the offensive line. I just think he's incredibly particular about what he wants and we better hope he gets over it or finds a way to land the guys he wants.

Who knows where we'd be right now if Weston Richburg never got injured. Alex Mack retired. They drafted McGlinchey with a top 10 pick. Traded for Trent Williams then paid him highest $ twice.

I just don't understand his obsession with Brendel...that I just can't get behind.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Exactly.

Saleh - head coach
McDaniels - OC
Ulbrich or Demeco - DC

trade Kyle to some schmo franchise trying to sell tickets. He's never going to win a SB anyways might as well let him dazzle the fan with cute out routes to FBs.

guaranteed the above combo gets this team a title within 3 years.

Just hilarious stuff right here…

Get rid of Shanahan and bring in an OC running a TOTALLY different scheme. Brilliant.

Ulbrich has a job btw and DeMeco isn't going anywhere.

Must be nice to just throw out crap out there with nothing behind it.

How is Mike McDaniela running a totally different scheme ? He suffers from the same flaws as Kyle. Brilliant offensive mind, horrible head coach. The difference is McDaniels will come back as OC and brilliantly scheme plays up on the couch while Kyle is full of himself and will just ruin some other franchise's dream of winning a SB.

Well considering it's Mike McDaniel and not McDaniels, I took you at your word and assumed you were calling for Josh McDaniels.

If you cared enough to look around the league you'd understand how important it is these days to have an offensive minded HC who can protect the team from having his coordinators poached.

You want Saleh as HC when he's clearly a much better DC than HC. You're all over the place…

Saleh only coached for 2 seasons.
Kyle has been doing it for 10.

interesting that you can conclude that Saleh is a much better DC than HC based on a small sample size, yet Kyle has the same amount of SBs in a much larger time span but you have a completely take on that.

biased much ?

You can't be a serious poster. I refuse to believe you're this much of a casual that you can't get simple things right like Mike McDaniel vs McDaniels.

Or the fact that Saleh was with the Jets for 4 seasons, not 2.

FYI since you can't seem to keep what happened straight, Kyle Shanahan took over a worse roster with the 49ers and had the team in the SB in year 3. Saleh took over the team and had the opportunity to keep Sam Darnold there. Instead drafted Zach Wilson #2 overall and we all know how that went. Then they went to get Aaron Rodgers...how'd that go?

Maybe one day you'll actually post using the truth, logic and see if that changes your opinion. There is nothing that Saleh has shown as a HC to indicate he's the guy to get us a SB win. NOTHING.
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by Montana:
Kyle and Saleh looked lost and glazed over but who I guess who wouldn't after all the cluster cluck that has happened? I wish we could have had a better showing though, they owned us. I kinda feel like they just deflated early on, like the oxygen being cut off the balls. Like in those last moments of those Super Bowls lol

Well, I think this is the first game of the year where all the injuries finally caught up to them. You just can't lose as many important starters as this team has and expect to be competitive every week. If Warner, Bosa, Huff and Pearsall had been healthy, I suspect this is a different outcome. I didn't include Brock only because Jones has been playing pretty well, but you have to think his greater mobility might have brought them a first down or two.

I was more nervous concerned about this game than the Falcons one. The biggest weakness of Houston was their pass protection. Really poor timing for the 49ers to be without their top 3 pass rushers and then losing Sam O and Elliott on top of it. Even Nico Collins being out was in some way better for Stroud so he wouldn't keep locking in on him(and Collins was struggling with drops and being off with Stroud)

Now what I didn't anticipate was us struggling with the run game.

Overall just felt like a let down game given the primetime emotional win with Fred there. Energy wasn't there at all and we better find a way to get that back for the Giants game or we could be looking at 5-4 heading into a Rams game which will be even tougher than our TNF one against them.
  • DrEll
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 11,083
Originally posted by genus49:
You can't be a serious poster. I refuse to believe you're this much of a casual that you can't get simple things right like Mike McDaniel vs McDaniels.

Or the fact that Saleh was with the Jets for 4 seasons, not 2.

FYI since you can't seem to keep what happened straight, Kyle Shanahan took over a worse roster with the 49ers and had the team in the SB in year 3. Saleh took over the team and had the opportunity to keep Sam Darnold there. Instead drafted Zach Wilson #2 overall and we all know how that went. Then they went to get Aaron Rodgers...how'd that go?

Maybe one day you'll actually post using the truth, logic and see if that changes your opinion. There is nothing that Saleh has shown as a HC to indicate he's the guy to get us a SB win. NOTHING.

I see you're resorting to insults. Too bad you cant give yourself a timeout for attacking other posters. That's ok. Shame you couldn't differentiate between McDaniel and McDaniels in my posts. Considering you have no job and basically respond to EVERY comment in this thread, I'd figure you would have deduced who I was talking about given that I've mentioned it several times already. But that's ok. And since we're focusing on fine details Robert Saleh didn't coach there for the full four years, he was fired early on in his fourth. Still a much less sample size for someone to determine he's not head coaching mater while in the same breath heralding Kyle Shanahan as Walsh like.
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by genus49:
You can't be a serious poster. I refuse to believe you're this much of a casual that you can't get simple things right like Mike McDaniel vs McDaniels.

Or the fact that Saleh was with the Jets for 4 seasons, not 2.

FYI since you can't seem to keep what happened straight, Kyle Shanahan took over a worse roster with the 49ers and had the team in the SB in year 3. Saleh took over the team and had the opportunity to keep Sam Darnold there. Instead drafted Zach Wilson #2 overall and we all know how that went. Then they went to get Aaron Rodgers...how'd that go?

Maybe one day you'll actually post using the truth, logic and see if that changes your opinion. There is nothing that Saleh has shown as a HC to indicate he's the guy to get us a SB win. NOTHING.

I see you're resorting to insults. Too bad you cant give yourself a timeout for attacking other posters. That's ok. Shame you couldn't differentiate between McDaniel and McDaniels in my posts. Considering you have no job and basically respond to EVERY comment in this thread, I'd figure you would have deduced who I was talking about given that I've mentioned it several times already. But that's ok. And since we're focusing on fine details Robert Saleh didn't coach there for the full four years, he was fired early on in his fourth. Still a much less sample size for someone to determine he's not head coaching mater while in the same breath heralding Kyle Shanahan as Walsh like.

I'm not singling out anyone but I really dislike it when one poster starts attacking another. It's one thing to disagree with an opinion. That's part of this whole website. Unfortunately those disagreements often get personal and downright mean. They sometimes carry on for several pages. It often looks like posters are carrying on a vendetta.
Shanahan has been coaching like a mad man this year. It's remarkable to think we are 5-3 after losing a pile of key contributors to free agency and half our team being injured. I have mad respect for him. There are only a few coaches in his league.

That being said, we paid a pile of money to Luke Farrell and he only played 3 snaps. Wasn't he signed to be a blocking specialist? Considering we couldn't stop the Texans pass rush why weren't we playing more two TE sets?

Kittle 43 snaps
Juice 20 snaps
Tonges 5 snaps
Farrell 3 snaps

I know we were playing from behind and had a lot of 3 wide sets but still, if we can't protect our QB none of it matters.

Demarcus Robinson played 27 snaps and has been a bust so far. I'd rather play a two TE set so at least one TE (Kittle or Farrell) can stay in to help block. Or keep Juice on the LOS to help block instead of in motion out of the backfield.

Bourne and Jennings on the outside with Kittle in the seams and CMC as a check down. Someone would be open if we had more time to throw. It would open up even more when we get Pearsall and Aiuyk back because they at least have the speed to threaten the D.

Moving forward when healthy this is what I'd like to see:

TE- Luke Farrell / Juice
LT- Trent Williams
LG- Spencer Burford
C- Matt Hennessy
RG- Dominic Puni
RT- Colton McKivitz
TE- George Kittle

WR- Ricky Pearsall
WR- Brandon Aiuyk
RB- CMC
[ Edited by Sask49erFan on Oct 27, 2025 at 10:25 AM ]
Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Shanahan has been coaching like a mad man this year. It's remarkable to think we are 5-3 after losing a pile of key contributors to free agency and half our team being injured. I have mad respect for him. There are only a few coaches in his league.

That being said, we paid a pile of money to Luke Farrell and he only played 3 snaps. Wasn't he signed to be a blocking specialist? Considering we couldn't stop the Texans pass rush why weren't we playing more two TE sets?

Kittle 43 snaps
Juice 20 snaps
Tonges 5 snaps
Farrell 3 snaps

I know we were playing from behind and had a lot of 3 wide sets but still, if we can't protect our QB none of it matters.

Demarcus Robinson played 27 snaps and has been a bust so far. I'd rather play a two TE set so at least one TE (Kittle or Farrell) can stay in to help block. Or keep Juice on the LOS to help block instead of in motion out of the backfield.

Bourne and Jennings on the outside with Kittle in the seams and CMC as a check down. Someone would be open if we had more time to throw. It would open up even more when we get Pearsall and Aiuyk back because they at least have the speed to threaten the D.

I agree. I personally think Kyle is doing some of his best coaching of his career. Injuries are insane, mind boggling, you can see it in his face when someone else goes down. He's almost unfazed by it. He even said it in his presser after yesterday that he can't focus on the injuries. It's part of the game.

He's trying to motivate the team as best as he can despite our leaders gone with injuries. One criticism I have is that he hates to trust young players and goes with veterans who are not making a difference.
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by genus49:
You can't be a serious poster. I refuse to believe you're this much of a casual that you can't get simple things right like Mike McDaniel vs McDaniels.

Or the fact that Saleh was with the Jets for 4 seasons, not 2.

FYI since you can't seem to keep what happened straight, Kyle Shanahan took over a worse roster with the 49ers and had the team in the SB in year 3. Saleh took over the team and had the opportunity to keep Sam Darnold there. Instead drafted Zach Wilson #2 overall and we all know how that went. Then they went to get Aaron Rodgers...how'd that go?

Maybe one day you'll actually post using the truth, logic and see if that changes your opinion. There is nothing that Saleh has shown as a HC to indicate he's the guy to get us a SB win. NOTHING.

I see you're resorting to insults. Too bad you cant give yourself a timeout for attacking other posters. That's ok. Shame you couldn't differentiate between McDaniel and McDaniels in my posts. Considering you have no job and basically respond to EVERY comment in this thread, I'd figure you would have deduced who I was talking about given that I've mentioned it several times already. But that's ok. And since we're focusing on fine details Robert Saleh didn't coach there for the full four years, he was fired early on in his fourth. Still a much less sample size for someone to determine he's not head coaching mater while in the same breath heralding Kyle Shanahan as Walsh like.

Highlight the insult. Please...

And why would I assume you mean McDaniel when you actually POSTED McDaniels? I don't remember every post made here, especially yours since it's filled with nothing of substance. Kind of why your posts read like you're trolling.

And notice how you ignored the fact that Shanahan went to the SB in his 3rd season? Did Saleh not have a 3rd season in NY to do the same or win the SB like you claim he would do?

You come in here and post nonsense. When questioned you either move to something else, move the goalposts or latch onto something minor to try to avoid the questions.

That is why I don't think you're a serious poster. If anything that's the opposite of an insult.
Originally posted by 951NINER:
Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Shanahan has been coaching like a mad man this year. It's remarkable to think we are 5-3 after losing a pile of key contributors to free agency and half our team being injured. I have mad respect for him. There are only a few coaches in his league.

That being said, we paid a pile of money to Luke Farrell and he only played 3 snaps. Wasn't he signed to be a blocking specialist? Considering we couldn't stop the Texans pass rush why weren't we playing more two TE sets?

Kittle 43 snaps
Juice 20 snaps
Tonges 5 snaps
Farrell 3 snaps

I know we were playing from behind and had a lot of 3 wide sets but still, if we can't protect our QB none of it matters.

Demarcus Robinson played 27 snaps and has been a bust so far. I'd rather play a two TE set so at least one TE (Kittle or Farrell) can stay in to help block. Or keep Juice on the LOS to help block instead of in motion out of the backfield.

Bourne and Jennings on the outside with Kittle in the seams and CMC as a check down. Someone would be open if we had more time to throw. It would open up even more when we get Pearsall and Aiuyk back because they at least have the speed to threaten the D.

I agree. I personally think Kyle is doing some of his best coaching of his career. Injuries are insane, mind boggling, you can see it in his face when someone else goes down. He's almost unfazed by it. He even said it in his presser after yesterday that he can't focus on the injuries. It's part of the game.

He's trying to motivate the team as best as he can despite our leaders gone with injuries. One criticism I have is that he hates to trust young players and goes with veterans who are not making a difference.

That's a legit criticism with Kyle. Though I think we see it's more of an issue with the offense. He's so particular in what he wants to see in his system that he won't trust young players until they have their mind right. It's what kept most rookie WRs off the field outside of Aiyuk who was basically forced out there cuz of injuries and Deebo in 2019.
IMO, it's not KS coaching that's the issue.

It's his reluctance to aggressively get a better OLine.

The OLine was Swiss cheese and Mac didn't have time to breath. They were on him before WR could get into a break.

The OLine couldn't open holes for CMC to run through.

As a result out D was on the field getting worn out.
[ Edited by LasVegasWally on Oct 27, 2025 at 10:43 AM ]
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by socalfan21:
Shanahan won't ever be held accountable for anything. He's going to coach here for 20 years with 10 nfc championship appearances and zero super bowls and zero care for the offensive line. He's on track for something special.

I don't believe Kyle has 0 care about the offensive line. I just think he's incredibly particular about what he wants and we better hope he gets over it or finds a way to land the guys he wants.

Who knows where we'd be right now if Weston Richburg never got injured. Alex Mack retired. They drafted McGlinchey with a top 10 pick. Traded for Trent Williams then paid him highest $ twice.

I just don't understand his obsession with Brendel...that I just can't get behind.

It's not that Shanahan doesn't care about the OL - of course he does as he knows that's the key to making his scheme function consistently at a high level. And it's not like he and Lynch haven't tried to address it.

The issue is they haven't done a good job over the years of addressing it with better OL talent across the line (excluding LT Williams), especially a long-term, quality guy at C to help control & quarterback things up front. There have been talented OL in the draft that were there for the taking in the earlier rounds. They took Puni pretty early, which was a good pick IMO and hoping he turns things around after a tough season so far (the preseason knee injury might have something to do w/ his struggles). Banks, after a slow start, began picking things up (when healthy) and making an impact next to Williams...then went to GB for big $.

So via the draft, FA, and trades, the Niners haven't been able to build an OL that year after year either consistently wins in the trenches or, at the very least against good teams/talented DLs, comes out even or at least competes well. Yesterday, we saw what happens when the Niners' OL goes against a talented DL - it's too much of a "no contest" where the Niners' OL just can't compete well and thus, the offense doesn't execute like it's drawn up and has to be continuously adjusted in-game to accommodate so they have a chance. If you have more talent across the OL, you can just do more things each game and be more competitive vs. tougher DLs, even when you have guys out w/ injuries (assuming you have some kind of competence at QB1 or QB2 - the Niners have both who are more than competent).

This has far too often been a recurring theme w/ OLs under Shanahan during his time here, unfortunately. It rears its ugly head in the playoffs when they face better teams w/ more talent on the DL. They've been able to work around it many times where other parts of their team steps up and also Shanahan schemes up adjustments, etc. But unfortunately, it catches up with them at crucial points of some of the most important playoff games.

The Colts and the OL they've built are an example showing what a good line can do that consistently wins in the trenches. They have given new life to a QB like Daniel Jones (Daniel Jones!). To his credit, he's done a very good job in making plays and running that offense. The OL only allowed six sacks through the first seven games. They've also helped a very good RB in Taylor flourish again. All this makes the Colts' offense very well balanced and tough to stop (averaging over 30 pts. a game).

Shanahan overall during his time here IMO has done a very good job as HC. Especially considering how much this team has been injured this season and previously. However, the subpar OLs under him have been a big area of deficiency, which is a key issue as it's such an important area to winning in football (winning in the trenches).

Yet keeping the faith...keeping hope alive that this will change one of these days. Hoping guys like Puni and McKivitz (since he's here through 2028) improve. Hoping the team finds better quality at the other positions (which might include LT for next year), where they can function together as a highly-competitive unit game in and game out.
Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:
It's not that Shanahan doesn't care about the OL - of course he does as he knows that's the key to making his scheme function consistently at a high level. And it's not like he and Lynch haven't tried to address it.

The issue is they haven't done a good job over the years of addressing it with better OL talent across the line (excluding LT Williams), especially a long-term, quality guy at C to help control & quarterback things up front. There have been talented OL in the draft that were there for the taking in the earlier rounds. They took Puni pretty early, which was a good pick IMO and hoping he turns things around after a tough season so far (the preseason knee injury might have something to do w/ his struggles). Banks, after a slow start, began picking things up (when healthy) and making an impact next to Williams...then went to GB for big $.

So via the draft, FA, and trades, the Niners haven't been able to build an OL that year after year either consistently wins in the trenches or, at the very least against good teams/talented DLs, comes out even or at least competes well. Yesterday, we saw what happens when the Niners' OL goes against a talented DL - it's too much of a "no contest" where the Niners' OL just can't compete well and thus, the offense doesn't execute like it's drawn up and has to be continuously adjusted in-game to accommodate so they have a chance. If you have more talent across the OL, you can just do more things each game and be more competitive vs. tougher DLs, even when you have guys out w/ injuries (assuming you have some kind of competence at QB1 or QB2 - the Niners have both who are more than competent).

This has far too often been a recurring theme w/ OLs under Shanahan during his time here, unfortunately. It rears its ugly head in the playoffs when they face better teams w/ more talent on the DL. They've been able to work around it many times where other parts of their team steps up and also Shanahan schemes up adjustments, etc. But unfortunately, it catches up with them at crucial points of some of the most important playoff games.

The Colts and the OL they've built are an example showing what a good line can do that consistently wins in the trenches. They have given new life to a QB like Daniel Jones (Daniel Jones!). To his credit, he's done a very good job in making plays and running that offense. The OL only allowed six sacks through the first seven games. They've also helped a very good RB in Taylor flourish again. All this makes the Colts' offense very well balanced and tough to stop (averaging over 30 pts. a game).

Shanahan overall during his time here IMO has done a very good job as HC. Especially considering how much this team has been injured this season and previously. However, the subpar OLs under him have been a big area of deficiency, which is a key issue as it's such an important area to winning in football (winning in the trenches).

Yet keeping the faith...keeping hope alive that this will change one of these days. Hoping guys like Puni and McKivitz (since he's here through 2028) improve. Hoping the team finds better quality at the other positions (which might include LT for next year), where they can function together as a highly-competitive unit game in and game out.

I think part of the issue is Foerester and his thinking of "use the early picks on guys who touch the ball and I'll coach up the OLmen who drop" as a coach I get that mentality and I can somewhat respect it. The problem is if you get the consensus more talented players you should be able to coach them up as well and in turn produce a better OL which improves the offense across the board.

I also don't know how good of an example the Colts are since for years they build up their talent level but had issues at QB since Luck retired. They finally put it all together and that includes their OL being a strength.

I do have an issue with some of our drafting, especially in the 3rd round for the most part. I felt like we got a little too overconfident in what we had and missed an opportunity to build up the lines and suddenly injuries are exposing those misses. I absolutely hated our Moody/Latu picks and even Brown which was a pick I didn't hate is turning into a miss.

I've said many times in hindsight the Lance decision was a terrible one and it was the biggest fault of Kyle's tenure here. But the mistake was made so we have to battle out of it. And I'll still take Shanahan and our front office over most. The team is constantly fighting regardless who is out there even if we have moments of low energy which happens to most teams time to time.

I strongly believe that the team went into this year thinking retool. I think that's partly why they're hesitant to make a trade this year - realistically we simply don't have the bodies to go the distance so why move draft picks that could potentially get you a young cheap player to help? I think if they make a trade it will be a younger cheaper player who won't cost much and can remain on the team next year+. And I certainly hope that next offseason we make a BIG push to rebuild/retool the OL similar to what we did with the DL this past offseason. Though we clearly also need edge rushers - think speed/bend variety.
  • 9moon
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 21,950
Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:
It's not that Shanahan doesn't care about the OL - of course he does as he knows that's the key to making his scheme function consistently at a high level. And it's not like he and Lynch haven't tried to address it.

The issue is they haven't done a good job over the years of addressing it with better OL talent across the line (excluding LT Williams), especially a long-term, quality guy at C to help control & quarterback things up front. There have been talented OL in the draft that were there for the taking in the earlier rounds. They took Puni pretty early, which was a good pick IMO and hoping he turns things around after a tough season so far (the preseason knee injury might have something to do w/ his struggles). Banks, after a slow start, began picking things up (when healthy) and making an impact next to Williams...then went to GB for big $.

So via the draft, FA, and trades, the Niners haven't been able to build an OL that year after year either consistently wins in the trenches or, at the very least against good teams/talented DLs, comes out even or at least competes well. Yesterday, we saw what happens when the Niners' OL goes against a talented DL - it's too much of a "no contest" where the Niners' OL just can't compete well and thus, the offense doesn't execute like it's drawn up and has to be continuously adjusted in-game to accommodate so they have a chance. If you have more talent across the OL, you can just do more things each game and be more competitive vs. tougher DLs, even when you have guys out w/ injuries (assuming you have some kind of competence at QB1 or QB2 - the Niners have both who are more than competent).

This has far too often been a recurring theme w/ OLs under Shanahan during his time here, unfortunately. It rears its ugly head in the playoffs when they face better teams w/ more talent on the DL. They've been able to work around it many times where other parts of their team steps up and also Shanahan schemes up adjustments, etc. But unfortunately, it catches up with them at crucial points of some of the most important playoff games.

The Colts and the OL they've built are an example showing what a good line can do that consistently wins in the trenches. They have given new life to a QB like Daniel Jones (Daniel Jones!). To his credit, he's done a very good job in making plays and running that offense. The OL only allowed six sacks through the first seven games. They've also helped a very good RB in Taylor flourish again. All this makes the Colts' offense very well balanced and tough to stop (averaging over 30 pts. a game).

Shanahan overall during his time here IMO has done a very good job as HC. Especially considering how much this team has been injured this season and previously. However, the subpar OLs under him have been a big area of deficiency, which is a key issue as it's such an important area to winning in football (winning in the trenches).

Yet keeping the faith...keeping hope alive that this will change one of these days. Hoping guys like Puni and McKivitz (since he's here through 2028) improve. Hoping the team finds better quality at the other positions (which might include LT for next year), where they can function together as a highly-competitive unit game in and game out.

I think part of the issue is Foerester and his thinking of "use the early picks on guys who touch the ball and I'll coach up the OLmen who drop" as a coach I get that mentality and I can somewhat respect it. The problem is if you get the consensus more talented players you should be able to coach them up as well and in turn produce a better OL which improves the offense across the board.

I also don't know how good of an example the Colts are since for years they build up their talent level but had issues at QB since Luck retired. They finally put it all together and that includes their OL being a strength.

I do have an issue with some of our drafting, especially in the 3rd round for the most part. I felt like we got a little too overconfident in what we had and missed an opportunity to build up the lines and suddenly injuries are exposing those misses. I absolutely hated our Moody/Latu picks and even Brown which was a pick I didn't hate is turning into a miss.

I've said many times in hindsight the Lance decision was a terrible one and it was the biggest fault of Kyle's tenure here. But the mistake was made so we have to battle out of it. And I'll still take Shanahan and our front office over most. The team is constantly fighting regardless who is out there even if we have moments of low energy which happens to most teams time to time.

I strongly believe that the team went into this year thinking retool. I think that's partly why they're hesitant to make a trade this year - realistically we simply don't have the bodies to go the distance so why move draft picks that could potentially get you a young cheap player to help? I think if they make a trade it will be a younger cheaper player who won't cost much and can remain on the team next year+. And I certainly hope that next offseason we make a BIG push to rebuild/retool the OL similar to what we did with the DL this past offseason. Though we clearly also need edge rushers - think speed/bend variety.

and the same CYCLE will happen... the CORE of this team is now on the down side, either by age or by injury.. Brick by Brick Brothers will continue to reach for players who will continue to be such bust... 5 years from now, we'll continue to look competetive and be posting same pains that we are posting now..
I see its the same old posters here happy to be posting about a loss.
Originally posted by 9moon:
and the same CYCLE will happen... the CORE of this team is now on the down side, either by age or by injury.. Brick by Brick Brothers will continue to reach for players who will continue to be such bust... 5 years from now, we'll continue to look competetive and be posting same pains that we are posting now..

It took the "Brick by Brick Brothers" 2 years starting with a much weaker roster to get the team to the SB.

I'll take that type of cycle because I believe much more in the QB we have now vs the guy who went to the SB with us that season.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone