Originally posted by 49er-from-Yavin-IV:
Funny to see the overreactions to standard operating procedures. "It's a black eye for the Ravens," and other stupid comments.
Crosby failed his physical and that nullified the deal. There is zero egg on the Ravens' faces.
I mean… the truth could very well be somewhere in the middle.
We don't know what "failed his physical" really entails. We know he's recovering from a meniscus surgery so anything could theoretically be used to say he "failed" including old information that everyone already knew.
Personally, I think it's simple as this: The Ravens made their offer and presumed Crosby had only a 1% chance of blowing his knee out and never playing football again. They then did their physical that they were entitled to do and their doctors concluded he actually had a 10% chance of blowing his knee out and never playing football again.
The Ravens then decided "oh screw that that's way too much draft capital to give up for that much risk let's just sign Hendrickson instead—he may have a 15-20% chance of blowing his leg out and never playing again but at least we don't have to give up draft picks."
Which begs the question—are the Ravens entitled to set different parameters/thresholds for different individual players depending on circumstances? I think it's a fair question. If you're trading heavy draft capital for a player, perhaps you SHOULD be allowed to set a much higher medical standard than you would most other players.
I don't know why in today's world it's gotta be all one side or the other. There were very, very likely a lot of nuances in play here. Another team could very well be okay taking the risk but at a lower price, or very well have a medical team that comes to a very different conclusion.
[ Edited by Fanaticofnfl on Mar 11, 2026 at 8:07 AM ]