There are 430 users in the forums
Originally posted by 9erson3:
Originally posted by Wolf_Packer_53:
LMAO you literally just minimized every asset the Rams gave up for McDuffie. I mean by your logic, the Rams got him for free 😆
Like Les says not waiting for draft dreams. He's right. Lynch we need to make some moves.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Wolf_Packer_53:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:LMAO you literally just minimized every asset the Rams gave up for McDuffie. I mean by your logic, the Rams got him for free 😆
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
That's a lot of capital to give up for a CB. If we did that people would be going after Lynch's head, even if our roster was comparable to the Rams. Risky move
They had 2 first round picks and they gve up the lower of the 2. A 3rd rounder in 2027 is likely to be near or att he end of the draft so that's not much different than a high 4th rounder. 5th and 6th this year is no big deal. So they filled their biggest weakness with the 29th overall pick and he's not a draft pick. He's an NFL pro bowler. Good trade for the Rams.
You're both right. They had two first round picks and got a great player at a position of need with a team thats in WIN NOW mode with Staffords age.
Chiefs are going to reload.
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
It's the Lance trade or Russell Wilson trade again but with lower risk. But the risk still exists. Anytime you trade multiple mid to high value assets for one potentially high value asset, you run the risk of your trade bombing if that asset you are getting gets injured or underperforms. Outside of the Stafford and CMC trades, I can't think of a similar trade like this that worked out in recent years.
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
It's the Lance trade or Russell Wilson trade again but with lower risk. But the risk still exists. Anytime you trade multiple mid to high value assets for one potentially high value asset, you run the risk of your trade bombing if that asset you are getting gets injured or underperforms. Outside of the Stafford and CMC trades, I can't think of a similar trade like this that worked out in recent years.
The sauce gardner trade is shaping up to be a disaster. Michah trade.... We'll see
Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
It's the Lance trade or Russell Wilson trade again but with lower risk. But the risk still exists. Anytime you trade multiple mid to high value assets for one potentially high value asset, you run the risk of your trade bombing if that asset you are getting gets injured or underperforms. Outside of the Stafford and CMC trades, I can't think of a similar trade like this that worked out in recent years.
The sauce gardner trade is shaping up to be a disaster. Michah trade.... We'll see
Parson worked out well for GB hes been playing well got injured later in year but was probably 2nd best defensive player behind Garett
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Why isn't Crosby a niner yet? Do something lynch, Les Snead tea bagging you
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
I'd say if anything we are closer to the Chiefs then the Rams in this scenario. We have a ton of holes and need draft capital more than expensive talent.
However on the surface I do think Lynch is less dynamic as a GM than I would like. You don't have to sign everyone or make big splashes but at least make some draft day trades to get more capital and absolutely trade Mac for whatever we can get. We are at the accumulation stage of our rebuild. We need to get young and fast through the draft.
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
I'd say if anything we are closer to the Chiefs then the Rams in this scenario. We have a ton of holes and need draft capital more than expensive talent.
However on the surface I do think Lynch is less dynamic as a GM than I would like. You don't have to sign everyone or make big splashes but at least make some draft day trades to get more capital and absolutely trade Mac for whatever we can get. We are at the accumulation stage of our rebuild. We need to get young and fast through the draft.
only issue with that is we can't draft
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Why isn't Crosby a niner yet? Do something lynch, Les Snead tea bagging you
IMO, trade for Thibodeaux or Greenard will be a whole lot better for the 9ers than trading for Crosby. Shoot, I'd rather they sign Trey Hendrickson than trade for Crosby.
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
I'd say if anything we are closer to the Chiefs then the Rams in this scenario. We have a ton of holes and need draft capital more than expensive talent.
However on the surface I do think Lynch is less dynamic as a GM than I would like. You don't have to sign everyone or make big splashes but at least make some draft day trades to get more capital and absolutely trade Mac for whatever we can get. We are at the accumulation stage of our rebuild. We need to get young and fast through the draft.
only issue with that is we can't draft
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Why isn't Crosby a niner yet? Do something lynch, Les Snead tea bagging you
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
I'd say if anything we are closer to the Chiefs then the Rams in this scenario. We have a ton of holes and need draft capital more than expensive talent.
However on the surface I do think Lynch is less dynamic as a GM than I would like. You don't have to sign everyone or make big splashes but at least make some draft day trades to get more capital and absolutely trade Mac for whatever we can get. We are at the accumulation stage of our rebuild. We need to get young and fast through the draft.
only issue with that is we can't draft
You can't make up for bad drafting with trades and free agent signings. Fortunately our drafting isn't as bad as you're making it out to be.
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by Young2Owens:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
I'd say if anything we are closer to the Chiefs then the Rams in this scenario. We have a ton of holes and need draft capital more than expensive talent.
However on the surface I do think Lynch is less dynamic as a GM than I would like. You don't have to sign everyone or make big splashes but at least make some draft day trades to get more capital and absolutely trade Mac for whatever we can get. We are at the accumulation stage of our rebuild. We need to get young and fast through the draft.
only issue with that is we can't draft
You can't make up for bad drafting with trades and free agent signings. Fortunately our drafting isn't as bad as you're making it out to be.
Sadly i ain't exaggerating, I wish I was