Originally posted by Cosmo:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
As much as I'd love Garrett, think I'd rather hold onto the picks and money make a play for Bosa if/when he gets cut and draft an ER as well.
Even if it doesn't involve any firsts?
It will absolutely require #11 at a minimum. Every other team can beat our offer otherwise. We could come up with a nice package that doesn't involve 2026-2027 1sts though.
Idk about that, it's not who ever gives up the most.. it's whoever MG wants to go to
Why? Does he have a no trade clause?
No, but he could say "I'm not extending with that team, and I'm not playing without an extension."
He does have two years left on his current contract, and normally players who do the above only have one year, but if there's a player who could get away with having this leverage with two years remaining, it's a player like Garrett.
With that said, I don't think Garrett would refuse to play for us. He's on the record saying he "wants to play for a contender" and "wants to play for a team that already has a QB." As much as half this fanbase loves to dunk on this team, we were literally a 4th and 1 from winning the Lombardi one year ago. As much as half this fanbase loves to dunk on him, we DO have a QB. So we check both of his boxes. Teams like the Raiders (who are way too high up on the betting odds—Vegas bias/connection maybe?) check neither.
[ Edited by Fanaticofnfl on Feb 7, 2025 at 5:13 AM ]