Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 485 users in the forums

Week 14 2015: Thoughts after rewatching the game...

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by Janitor:
I think NCommand's list is flawed. A starter shouldn't count as a "hit" if they absolutely blow. Marcus Martin a "hit"? C'mon man....

See my notes on that one. Bottom line is, he was a starter. You can argue the quality and circumstances but by the operational definition, he's a hit.

Notes: One may consider noting that Marcus Martin is not a Starter or Starter worthy and they'd take Joe Looney any day over him.
Originally posted by Janitor:
I think NCommand's list is flawed. A starter shouldn't count as a "hit" if they absolutely blow. Marcus Martin a "hit"? C'mon man....

Or if they're starting because they're literally the only uninjured person at their position, lulz.
Only way I could have watched that hot garbage again is if I was either very drunk or tied to a chair. I hear the FBI is going to use this video to torture terrorist. No need for water boarding they will sing like canaries before half
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by LambdaChi49:
Yesterday's loss reminded me of 2006 all over again when we made guys like Damon Huard look like HOFers.

Hah!. That running back Crowell guy was looking like Jim Brown.

20carries, 145yds, 2 TDs

You're saying that wasn't Jim brown out there? I know he was at that game....I just assumed a back averaging over 7 yards a rip had to be Jim brown.
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by Marvin49:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Arik Armstead a hit? lol

And dudes who aren't even in the league anymore are also hits? I think the player needs to still be on the team 4 years later to be considered a hit.

Please explain why Armstead is NOT a hit.

Only peeps who really don't want to see it are saying he hasn't been playing well.

13 games, 11 tackles, 2 sacks? http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/2971275/arik-armstead

If he wasn't on the worst team in the NFL I doubt he would be playing.


Right...because tackles and sacks are the only measure of a good 3-4 end. SMDH.
Originally posted by Marvin49:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Originally posted by Marvin49:
Originally posted by 9erReign:
Arik Armstead a hit? lol

And dudes who aren't even in the league anymore are also hits? I think the player needs to still be on the team 4 years later to be considered a hit.

Please explain why Armstead is NOT a hit.

Only peeps who really don't want to see it are saying he hasn't been playing well.

13 games, 11 tackles, 2 sacks? http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/2971275/arik-armstead

If he wasn't on the worst team in the NFL I doubt he would be playing.


Right...because tackles and sacks are the only measure of a good 3-4 end. SMDH.

Box score fans are fun.
In regards to Armstead, everything I see on gamedays and read about in post-game analysis is positive.

DE Arik Armstead (+2.8) continued his strong play this season, finishing with a sack, four QB hurries, and the second-highest run defense grade on the defense. Armstead plays limited snaps, but his 15.1 pass rushing productivity is the highest among all 3-4 DE's in the league.

The fact he's been a part time player most of the year is an indictment against the coaching staff, not Armstead. The guy is a stud. Fantastic pick, they need to leave him on the field and let him go to work. He needs to clean up technique, that will come with experience. In the meantime he's throwing people around like rag dolls with shear strength and superior athleticism for the position.

How anyone could not like the guy as a young 22 year old is beyond me.
[ Edited by SofaKing on Dec 14, 2015 at 3:07 PM ]
Originally posted by SofaKing:
In regards to Armstead, everything I see on gamedays and read about in post-game analysis is positive.

DE Arik Armstead (+2.8) continued his strong play this season, finishing with a sack, four QB hurries, and the second-highest run defense grade on the defense. Armstead plays limited snaps, but his 15.1 pass rushing productivity is the highest among all 3-4 DE's in the league.

The fact he's been a part time player most of the year is an indictment against the coaching staff, not Armstead. The guy is a stud. Fantastic pick, they need to leave him on the field and let him go to work. He needs to clean up technique, that will come with experience. In the meantime he's throwing people around like rag dolls with shear strength and superior athleticism for the position.

How anyone could not like the guy as a young 22 year old is beyond me.

Completely agree. I have no idea why anyone is complaining about Armstead - he's one of the few bright spots.
  • Morgy
  • Hey bud, what’s your problem?
  • Posts: 30,433
Armstead - 7 out of 10. Would recommend.
Originally posted by itlynstalyn:
Originally posted by Janitor:
I think NCommand's list is flawed. A starter shouldn't count as a "hit" if they absolutely blow. Marcus Martin a "hit"? C'mon man....

Or if they're starting because they're literally the only uninjured person at their position, lulz.

I do agree with that. GM had a choice between Martin or Looney or both (started several games for us) once Kilgore had a 2nd surgery. Remember we ditched Looney b/c we were moving away from power and to a ZBS. Martin was the top C in the draft and started late last year. Was only 20. From there it's on the coaches to develop him. And he and the coaches failed miserably. Sadly. But the GM did do his job there...he grabbed the top C in the draft just in case Kilgore couldn't return.
[ Edited by NCommand on Dec 14, 2015 at 3:13 PM ]
Originally posted by crake49:
Originally posted by SofaKing:
In regards to Armstead, everything I see on gamedays and read about in post-game analysis is positive.

DE Arik Armstead (+2.8) continued his strong play this season, finishing with a sack, four QB hurries, and the second-highest run defense grade on the defense. Armstead plays limited snaps, but his 15.1 pass rushing productivity is the highest among all 3-4 DE's in the league.

The fact he's been a part time player most of the year is an indictment against the coaching staff, not Armstead. The guy is a stud. Fantastic pick, they need to leave him on the field and let him go to work. He needs to clean up technique, that will come with experience. In the meantime he's throwing people around like rag dolls with shear strength and superior athleticism for the position.

How anyone could not like the guy as a young 22 year old is beyond me.

Completely agree. I have no idea why anyone is complaining about Armstead - he's one of the few bright spots.

It's because baalke drafted him.....
[ Edited by Niners816 on Dec 14, 2015 at 3:19 PM ]
Originally posted by Niners816:
It's because baalke drafted him.....

Ding ding ding!
Sorry Marvin for derailing. Back to your assessment.

What are people's thoughts on Hodges? His speed is noticeable to me and he seemed to have a pretty good first start. Maybe thl/JD can highlight him and AA this week since they were the only two who had a decent game, right? LOL
[ Edited by NCommand on Dec 14, 2015 at 3:15 PM ]
Originally posted by Morgan49:
Armstead - 7 out of 10. Would recommend.

I'm guessing the 3 who don't are susweel (Peters), Elephant (anti-Baalke anything) and well, never mind. Haha.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,315
Originally posted by NCommand:
Sorry Marvin for derailing. Back to your assessment.

What are people's thoughts on Hodges? His speed is noticeable to me and he seemed to have a pretty good first start. Maybe thl/JD can highlight him and AA this week since they were the only two who had a decent game, right? LOL

I have never been so unmotivated to look at game film than right now.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone