Originally posted by Young2Rice:
Originally posted by InsertNameHere:
Originally posted by Young2Rice:
Originally posted by InsertNameHere:
Originally posted by jeepzilla:
Originally posted by InsertNameHere:
It's difficult to guess when we don't know if Mangini will be a good DC.
Also, we don't know if the injured players will come back 100%.
I think if everyone comes 100%, and Mangini does a good job, we have the talent to be in the top 10.
I agree with this. I don't know why anyone has faith in Mangini?
I guess you could have said the same about fangio
Looking at his stats, but if we would have had a lower ranked defense it wouldn't have surprised me.
Why does anyone think Mangini is this great d-cord. I've seen all the stats and the ages of the pats d as everyone has pointed out.
I have zero faith in the clown.
I was never a Fangio fan. He had the two best ILB, the best pass rushing OLB(Aldon), the best 3-4 DE(Smith) and probowl talent at every other position, for the most part. We could've had any DC from 2011-2013 and had a top 5 defense.
We really have no idea what Mangini can bring to the table. Will he blitz more than Fangio, I hope. Will he have our CBs playing 10yrds back on 3rd and short situations like Fangio, I hope not.
It is a tad unnerving that I never heard his name associated with any teams, for a DC position, since his last stint as coach. Why is it.....?
We didn't always have Aldon on the field and Watt is the best 3-4 DE. Also, Bowman was on the bench before Fangio arrived. Fangio also coached the dome patrol in NO, which was one of the best LB core in NFL history. I doubt it is merely a coincidence that he coached two of the finest linebackers squads and had little to do with their success.
Also, Fangio was DC on the expansion Panthers and they were a really good defense for a few years. They had some good linebackers there as well. Expansion teams don't have much talent but he made it work just like with the plethora of injuries we had last year.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but I belive Stanford also had a great Defense.
Sure, he had some not so great seasons but he's also has had success coaching. Mangini on the other hand, has alienated himself from teams with his behavior and lack of success. Probably explains why he, a defensive guy, ended up coaching TEs here. I don't know what else to judge him on besides his failure as a HC, DC and TE coach, all excuses aside.
Sometimes coaches luck out and end up with great players(phil jackson with Kobe and Jordan). The "dome patrol" and our LBs were more about their talent level than his coaching. In 2010 we had the 13th ranked defense.
J.Smith was the best 3-4 DE from 2010-2012.
Fangio was an average coach with exceptional talent, plus we were a running team that normally won the time of possession. We'll see how Chicago looks this year.
Lakers with kobe and shaq didn't get over the hump until jackson arrived. Same with MJ and the bulls.
Its Hard to say Fangio just keeps getting that lucky with talent without giving him any credit for coaching up great players.
What about the success with the panthers when they were an expansion team? Lack of talent didn't stop him there.
And stanford? Any comment on those two stints?
The Panthers weren't an expansion team like the Bucs or teams in the past when there were no FAs. I just saw something about the Panthers today and other GMs(mainly the Bucs) called them a FA team and not expansion.
While Fangio was at Stanford they had Luck, and a killer running game. They dominated the TOP.
I don't think he's a horrible coach by any means. I do however feel like he benefited greatly from the talent we had.
Did it not drive you crazy when we wouldn't blitz, or when our DBs would play way too deep, on short yardage situations, letting the other team complete short passes for easy 1st downs?
