49ers vs. Raiders Tickets Available! →

There are 890 users in the forums

Where do you expect our defense to be Ranked this season?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

Where do you expect our defense to be Ranked this season?

Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?
  • susweel
  • Hall of Nepal
  • Posts: 122,044
Probably around 15
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

thank you
Originally posted by crake49:
I'm predicting top 10. I think this personnel has the ability to be top 5 and it's possible because there really aren't any offensive powerhouses in this division.

Agreed
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

why check facts when it is much easier to spit out bile?
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

why check facts when it is much easier to spit out bile?

Have you checked Manginis track record?

All I know is that we were a top 5 defense every year under Fangio, that track record should say enough.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

why check facts when it is much easier to spit out bile?

Have you checked Manginis track record?

All I know is that we were a top 5 defense every year under Fangio, that track record should say enough.
have you checked fangios record without our talent he was lucky enough to stumble into? and what about those games where he played a huge role in making wins harder than they needed to be? who is to say our new DC can not do good things with the people we have in place. fangio is way over valued by people here and it will be proven when he actually has to work with lesser talent in his new job
you tell 'em cc. No talent and vic was nobody special. He walks into anything else but an all pro D at virtually all positions except CB & SS, and what did he do? Answer : not much. Vic , like harbaw , was great because of the all pro talent he coached. He will never see talent like that assembled in his lifetime. Granted he made the most of it and unlike harbaw he produced with that gigantic D machine. Harbaw, to our great disappointment did not hold up his end of the bargain with the O, nor with his QB. QB whisperer? My azzzz.

So vic bolted when he figured he should have been heir apparent. Well, he wasn't the chosen guy and he isn't the heir apparent. Wonder how vic would have done with what we have left on D? It would have been interesting. But only a few guys have really made it bigtime coming from the D side of the ball at HC. Bellichek sure comes to mind and i can think of maybe 6 or 7 others. Walsh came from, all sidess of the ball, and we all were privileged to see him coach. But other DCs who became HCs all worked under the same tenet: "Well, if i know how a D works, i sure as hell ought to know how an O works." Wrong, wrong and wrong again. DCs just have a hard time coming to grips wth that, save a handful.
[ Edited by pasodoc9er on Apr 24, 2015 at 10:48 AM ]
  • 909er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 82
Originally posted by NCommand:
Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

I agree. Without our players, I don't think fangio would have done so well. I think our players will have something to prove this year with all the coaching turnover, and all mangini has to do is put them in position to let them play to their strengths. And if he doesn't then I can see coach Tomsula stepping in and changing some things to make it work. He's been here long enough to know what fits best for our team, offence and defense, jmho
sorry, i'll make sure to be a bigger homer next time i post in niner talk.
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
With Fangio, we would've been around the top 5 again. If Mangini coaches the defense like he's done in years past, we'll be lucky to be a top 15 defense.

Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

why check facts when it is much easier to spit out bile?

Have you checked Manginis track record?

All I know is that we were a top 5 defense every year under Fangio, that track record should say enough.

He had one year as a DC under a NE that was absolutely devastated by injuries back in 2005? Sort of a small, unfair sample size to draw totally negative conclusions while crediting Fangio w/o first looking at HIS track record as well? Could it be...possible...just possible that BOTH Mangini and Fangio could be successful with our personnel? I guess we'll find out with Mangini here and Fangio in Chicago although 1 year is still, to me, not a fair assessment period.
Originally posted by 909er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Such a lame argument. Have you checked out Fangio's track record before coming here and working with OUR personnel?

I agree. Without our players, I don't think fangio would have done so well. I think our players will have something to prove this year with all the coaching turnover, and all mangini has to do is put them in position to let them play to their strengths. And if he doesn't then I can see coach Tomsula stepping in and changing some things to make it work. He's been here long enough to know what fits best for our team, offence and defense, jmho

Agreed. Hell, Tomsula has 3 other former DC's on staff so Mangini better do well. LOL!
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
sorry, i'll make sure to be a bigger homer next time i post in niner talk.

Nothing wrong with having an opinion at all...we invite it. Just be prepared to back it up with a solid rationale and we're all golden.
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:
sorry, i'll make sure to be a bigger homer next time i post in niner talk.

Lame comment... You made a bold statement and you're being questioned as to the veracity of your remarks. Nothing about being a homer intended or implied...
  • 909er
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 82
I just want the damn season to start already, my game room is all dusty and lonely lol
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone