Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 298 users in the forums

Colin Kaepernick Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by Squirrel:
Originally posted by Stud:
Gabbert may not have been solid but he was better than Kap. Under Gabbert our offense had more total yards and points per game. Our offense had under 200 yards of total offense 4 times under Kap. Under Gabbert we had no less than 221 yards. For instance, under Kap, our offense had 13 total points in 3 games against Seattle dating back to 2014. With Gabbert at Seattle no less, we scored 13 in one game alone. Blaine also had a higher completion percentage and touchdown to interception rate, and a higher QB rating. So yeah, our offense still sucked with Blaine, but it was more effective. The stats speak for itself.

Your logic is not welcome here.

I welcome it,but yeah I get where you are coming from LOL.
Originally posted by sdaddy101269:
Originally posted by jedediahyork:
Originally posted by Sourball:
Just to be clear.....
You think all those players left the team because Kap got paid?

No, not all of them, but I'm sure it played a role in some of them. Especially with the whole separation of the locker room thing that happened. It's just ridiculous this argument about Kap leaving "millions" on the table when he's the highest paid player on this team is still floating around. Like it's not even close as to how much more than everyone else Kap is making. Kap is making double the amount of the next highest paid player on the team, in base salary alone, without any escalators...

This has to be the worst leap in the history of the WZ. Wtf.

Ha ha ha. Yeah, I was wondering WTF was that too. WZ,incredible. We just got to keep that moniker of the 'forty whiner' fan alive and well.
  • Stud
  • Member
  • Posts: 5,264
Originally posted by JohnMatrix:
Originally posted by Squirrel:
Originally posted by Stud:
Gabbert may not have been solid but he was better than Kap. Under Gabbert our offense had more total yards and points per game. Our offense had under 200 yards of total offense 4 times under Kap. Under Gabbert we had no less than 221 yards. For instance, under Kap, our offense had 13 total points in 3 games against Seattle dating back to 2014. With Gabbert at Seattle no less, we scored 13 in one game alone. Blaine also had a higher completion percentage and touchdown to interception rate, and a higher QB rating. So yeah, our offense still sucked with Blaine, but it was more effective. The stats speak for itself.

Your logic is not welcome here.

Gabbers also played with a better o-line for his starts, but I agree that even with that in mind he looked better.
Thats a myth. Gabbert was sacked 9 times against Cleveland. The O-line wasn't better, Gabbert was just a more aware pocket passing QB than Kap.
  • fropwns
  • The Last Fronin
  • Posts: 27,901
Just win.
Originally posted by Stud:
Originally posted by JohnMatrix:
Originally posted by Squirrel:
Originally posted by Stud:
Gabbert may not have been solid but he was better than Kap. Under Gabbert our offense had more total yards and points per game. Our offense had under 200 yards of total offense 4 times under Kap. Under Gabbert we had no less than 221 yards. For instance, under Kap, our offense had 13 total points in 3 games against Seattle dating back to 2014. With Gabbert at Seattle no less, we scored 13 in one game alone. Blaine also had a higher completion percentage and touchdown to interception rate, and a higher QB rating. So yeah, our offense still sucked with Blaine, but it was more effective. The stats speak for itself.

Your logic is not welcome here.

Gabbers also played with a better o-line for his starts, but I agree that even with that in mind he looked better.
Thats a myth. Gabbert was sacked 9 times against Cleveland. The O-line wasn't better, Gabbert was just a more aware pocket passing QB than Kap.

Gabbert was captain check down that don't make him a better QB the offense was still horrible that's due to coaching it was a terrible decision by management to have tomsula as coach.
Originally posted by 49er_Rider:
Originally posted by Stud:
Originally posted by JohnMatrix:
Originally posted by Squirrel:
Originally posted by Stud:
Gabbert may not have been solid but he was better than Kap. Under Gabbert our offense had more total yards and points per game. Our offense had under 200 yards of total offense 4 times under Kap. Under Gabbert we had no less than 221 yards. For instance, under Kap, our offense had 13 total points in 3 games against Seattle dating back to 2014. With Gabbert at Seattle no less, we scored 13 in one game alone. Blaine also had a higher completion percentage and touchdown to interception rate, and a higher QB rating. So yeah, our offense still sucked with Blaine, but it was more effective. The stats speak for itself.

Your logic is not welcome here.

Gabbers also played with a better o-line for his starts, but I agree that even with that in mind he looked better.
Thats a myth. Gabbert was sacked 9 times against Cleveland. The O-line wasn't better, Gabbert was just a more aware pocket passing QB than Kap.

Gabbert was captain check down that don't make him a better QB the offense was still horrible that's due to coaching it was a terrible decision by management to have tomsula as coach.

Tomsula should've never been coach tbh Management sabotaged last season and it was unfair to players and the fans to be treated like they did last year because Baalke couldn't get along with Harbaugh. Worst decision in franchise history to let that man go he brought the 49ers back to being relevant.
Originally posted by Harbaalke:
Tomsula should've never been coach tbh Management sabotaged last season and it was unfair to players and the fans to be treated like they did last year because Baalke couldn't get along with Harbaugh. Worst decision in franchise history to let that man go he brought the 49ers back to being relevant.

Maybe they'll let you change the username to Baalkelly.
If Kap wants to be on this team, then so be it...IF not to use an old term " fish or cut bait"
Originally posted by 49erguy49:
Originally posted by Harbaalke:
Tomsula should've never been coach tbh Management sabotaged last season and it was unfair to players and the fans to be treated like they did last year because Baalke couldn't get along with Harbaugh. Worst decision in franchise history to let that man go he brought the 49ers back to being relevant.

Maybe they'll let you change the username to Baalkelly.

Actually I prefer KellyGamble
Originally posted by Harbaalke:
Actually I prefer KellyGamble

No you didn't
Originally posted by GarnerValleyFan:
Originally posted by mojave45:
I have to believe Kelly is going to look at what he has in training camp. Last year Kaep played like crap. No hating, just saying. Even in preseason it was obvious things were not going well and everyone I talked too thought that Blaine looked better at that time. That is water under the bridge now. But I absolutely do not believe Kelly makes a decision on his starter based on what he was paid under the previous coach. He needs to win as many games as he can, for several reasons, but not the least of them is to prove everyone in Philly was wrong. But if Kaep comes out (if healthy) and looks good, sure th that is a no brainer, Kelly picks him. But if he comes out stinking it up and Blaine looks like a better option, or if Kaep is still not healed completely, I don't think Kelly gives a rats a** about who is being paid what if he decides he can't win with him. I have no idea at all who he is going to go with, but my gut tells me if there is a clear winner, then that is who he goes with.

I hear everyone talking about Jed boy being unhappy with a huge contract sitting on the bench, and can just hear Kelly saying, I made a decision on my starter based on facts. Maybe he does it with more finesse than he used in Philly, but he decides who starts. And I can see that being a place he would push back. This is a man that made Jeff Lurie cancel his annual , and long standing,Christmas party because Kelly felt that practice was more important. This is not a Tomsula type figurehead at the helm anymore, who had Trent down on the field coaching players.

I am not worried at all about this. I am gong to believe Kelly plays his best players, and their pay status may not mean that much to him.

I have my concerns about Kelly, but him putting what he believes to be his best players on the field is not something I spend any time worrying about.

Nah, Chip won't disrespect Jed and Baalke that way.

Uh huh, sure. I have my doubts about how all of this plays out. If Chip CHOOSES Kaepernick, and he well may, no issue. But if he doesn't, I don't believe he quietly goes to battle with the guy he doesn't want. Just to appease his GM. Honestly I don't believe Jed gives a crap. He just wants his seats full. Kelly says we will be better off with X behind center than Y and it will fill more seats, Jed boy says ok.
Originally posted by mojave45:
Originally posted by GarnerValleyFan:
Originally posted by mojave45:
I have to believe Kelly is going to look at what he has in training camp. Last year Kaep played like crap. No hating, just saying. Even in preseason it was obvious things were not going well and everyone I talked too thought that Blaine looked better at that time. That is water under the bridge now. But I absolutely do not believe Kelly makes a decision on his starter based on what he was paid under the previous coach. He needs to win as many games as he can, for several reasons, but not the least of them is to prove everyone in Philly was wrong. But if Kaep comes out (if healthy) and looks good, sure th that is a no brainer, Kelly picks him. But if he comes out stinking it up and Blaine looks like a better option, or if Kaep is still not healed completely, I don't think Kelly gives a rats a** about who is being paid what if he decides he can't win with him. I have no idea at all who he is going to go with, but my gut tells me if there is a clear winner, then that is who he goes with.

I hear everyone talking about Jed boy being unhappy with a huge contract sitting on the bench, and can just hear Kelly saying, I made a decision on my starter based on facts. Maybe he does it with more finesse than he used in Philly, but he decides who starts. And I can see that being a place he would push back. This is a man that made Jeff Lurie cancel his annual , and long standing,Christmas party because Kelly felt that practice was more important. This is not a Tomsula type figurehead at the helm anymore, who had Trent down on the field coaching players.

I am not worried at all about this. I am gong to believe Kelly plays his best players, and their pay status may not mean that much to him.

I have my concerns about Kelly, but him putting what he believes to be his best players on the field is not something I spend any time worrying about.

Nah, Chip won't disrespect Jed and Baalke that way.

Uh huh, sure. I have my doubts about how all of this plays out. If Chip CHOOSES Kaepernick, and he well may, no issue. But if he doesn't, I don't believe he quietly goes to battle with the guy he doesn't want. Just to appease his GM. Honestly I don't believe Jed gives a crap. He just wants his seats full. Kelly says we will be better off with X behind center than Y and it will fill more seats, Jed boy says ok.

TBH majority of people would rather see Kap over Gabbert. Cause if it don't make money it don't make sense 😉
Originally posted by 49er_Rider:
Originally posted by mojave45:
Originally posted by GarnerValleyFan:
Originally posted by mojave45:
I have to believe Kelly is going to look at what he has in training camp. Last year Kaep played like crap. No hating, just saying. Even in preseason it was obvious things were not going well and everyone I talked too thought that Blaine looked better at that time. That is water under the bridge now. But I absolutely do not believe Kelly makes a decision on his starter based on what he was paid under the previous coach. He needs to win as many games as he can, for several reasons, but not the least of them is to prove everyone in Philly was wrong. But if Kaep comes out (if healthy) and looks good, sure th that is a no brainer, Kelly picks him. But if he comes out stinking it up and Blaine looks like a better option, or if Kaep is still not healed completely, I don't think Kelly gives a rats a** about who is being paid what if he decides he can't win with him. I have no idea at all who he is going to go with, but my gut tells me if there is a clear winner, then that is who he goes with.

I hear everyone talking about Jed boy being unhappy with a huge contract sitting on the bench, and can just hear Kelly saying, I made a decision on my starter based on facts. Maybe he does it with more finesse than he used in Philly, but he decides who starts. And I can see that being a place he would push back. This is a man that made Jeff Lurie cancel his annual , and long standing,Christmas party because Kelly felt that practice was more important. This is not a Tomsula type figurehead at the helm anymore, who had Trent down on the field coaching players.

I am not worried at all about this. I am gong to believe Kelly plays his best players, and their pay status may not mean that much to him.

I have my concerns about Kelly, but him putting what he believes to be his best players on the field is not something I spend any time worrying about.

Nah, Chip won't disrespect Jed and Baalke that way.

Uh huh, sure. I have my doubts about how all of this plays out. If Chip CHOOSES Kaepernick, and he well may, no issue. But if he doesn't, I don't believe he quietly goes to battle with the guy he doesn't want. Just to appease his GM. Honestly I don't believe Jed gives a crap. He just wants his seats full. Kelly says we will be better off with X behind center than Y and it will fill more seats, Jed boy says ok.

TBH majority of people would rather see Kap over Gabbert. Cause if it don't make money it don't make sense 😉

Most people want to see the team win.
Originally posted by mojave45:
Most people want to see the team win.

Your reaching when the team is rebuilding right now is about putting butt in the seats
Originally posted by 49er_Rider:
Originally posted by mojave45:
Most people want to see the team win.

Your reaching when the team is rebuilding right now is about putting butt in the seats

You are being deliberately obtuse. Putting butts in the seats means putting your absolute best product in the field. Kelly will want to do that. If he thinks he will do better with one QB over the other, that is who will play. You think the guy in the seats pays to see Kaepernick over another QB? Horse crap. Again it may well be his choice but it may not. Abd yes all Jed and the bean counters worry about is seat sales. And to get that the best you can put out there with this new coach is what will happen. Jeds embarrassed more about empty seats than the name on the jersey. And you are absolutely right, this is a rebuild year. Dogging it this year just to play the expensive guy would be foolish. If that was the only reason.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone