Originally posted by Niners816:
Originally posted by Geeked:
I live in Houston and I've seen a couple of Rice games in person. And I can understand drafting McDonald. The guy had some unique skills and was a nightmare for the defenses he faced.
But, he wasn't facing the teams Stanford had to play which may have altered perceptions.
I'm stil not giving up on vance, he has proven to be a real good run blocker. Also at rice, wasn't he more of a slot type H-back? If memory serves, I don't thibk rice runs a pro scheme, so I still think vance can develop into a pass catcher. Hell VD had terrible hands early on and develop into a very good target.
My sentiments where more of a perfect offensive fit for both Ertz and fleener at the time.
I think the difference between those guys and Walker is you can't cover Walker with a LB AND he was a great blocker. that's what caused the match up problems. It forced you to either play nickel or base and pick your poison.