There are 836 users in the forums
Cox or Cully?
Cox or Cully?
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:25 PM
- LottDMontanaO
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,772
Can we have both re-signed? Would prefer that as we saw how thin CB can be towards the end of a season.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM
- SofaKing
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,442
Cully. Brock returns healthy and gets his LCB spot back from Cox. Cully gets to stay at RCB where he performed really well in his 1st year as a full-time starter.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:29 PM
- LottDMontanaO
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,772
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Cully. Brock returns healthy and gets his LCB spot back from Cox. Cully gets to stay at RCB where he performed really well in his 1st year as a full-time starter.
The only problem with relying on Brock is can he remain healthy for an entire season? If so, he's a quality CB as we know. Gotta keep Cully, too (hope he matures some more though).
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:30 PM
- thl408
- Moderator
- Posts: 33,299
Cully.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM
- SofaKing
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,442
Originally posted by LottDMontanaO:
The only problem with relying on Brock is can he remain healthy for an entire season? If so, he's a quality CB as we know. Gotta keep Cully, too (hope he matures some more though).
Fair point. Brock's injury is a concern. Turf toe can linger for a loooong time. I think he'll be our starter opening day, but we need a contingency plan if he goes down again. Dontae Johnson had a good rookie year and looks the part. I'm sure we'll add some guys too.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM
- btthepunk
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,304
I think both are better than Brock. I'd love to keep Cully, Cox, Brock, Johnson, Acker, and Reaser at CB and get Ward started on his safety conversion. Maybe stick Reaser and/or Acker on the PS or IR if possible.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:33 PM
- susweel
- Hall of Nepal
- Posts: 122,035
gots to go with the youf
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM
- sincalfaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,712
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Cox. He carries himself better and was the superior player last year. I also think he'll come cheaper. I'd like to sign both, but don't think we can afford that.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM
- Kolohe
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 66,794
Originally posted by AmpLee:
Cox. He carries himself better and was the superior player last year. I also think he'll come cheaper. I'd like to sign both, but don't think we can afford that.
Bingo.
Plus I think Cox has better range and pays the deep ball a lot better. Cox has earned it too, I think he's a far greater Corner than Brock, I've also never thought of Brock as a starter.
Jan 5, 2015 at 6:10 PM
- Fresh49
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,949
Both if it can be done
Jan 5, 2015 at 6:19 PM
- 49ers808
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,555
I like the both over Brock option. They both balled out this year, if I have to choose one, Cully. Reason, higher upside and Cox was criticized of losing focus and stuff from Fangio
Jan 5, 2015 at 6:22 PM
- KyleShanahan
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,779
Cox.
Cully is a punk.
Cully is a punk.
Jan 5, 2015 at 6:27 PM
- Gore_21
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,685
At the same price Culliver at a lot less and for less years Cox. I'll take Cox 2 years 5-6 million over Culliver 4-5 years 15-20 million
Jan 5, 2015 at 6:27 PM
- baltien
- Veteran
- Posts: 6,731
Cox.
Because he played well and Cully STILL
FORGETS TO TACKLE PEOPLE.
Because he played well and Cully STILL
FORGETS TO TACKLE PEOPLE.