Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 479 users in the forums

49ers GM Trent Baalke a candidate for Executive of the Year

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Thanks for the recommendation.

Let's be real people, Baalke is not the one bettering the organization, it is all Harbaugh and staff. Let's take the offense: The Niners offense has the same personnel as last year, except for a few tweeks, Miller and Goodwin. Are Miller and Goodwin making the difference in this team, compared to Baas and Norris? No. This is Harbaugh's magic, not Baalke's genius. By the way, our very own Baalke did not make a move on the offensive line this year to replace Rachal, who was the incumbent to win the job. That is genius? No.

On defense, the team let Franklin explore free agency, tried to get him back, but lost out to the Saints. The Niners shifted DL personnel, and did make one bold and aggressive move I do give credit to Baalke, signing McDonald. The rest of the front seven starting unit is the same. The secondary is largely the same, subbing Rogers for Clements, and Whitner for the R. Smith (injured) and Mays (49ers bust) combo. Rogers was a stroke of luck, not genius. We tried to bid for a number of free agents before signing him, and there was obviously no belief he would be anywhere close to as good as he has been , or he would have been the number 2 or 3 free agent CB on the market, not the 7th or 8th signed to a whopping one-year deal. Pure, blind luck, not genius.

I will tip my hat to his draft selection of Bowman last year.....right after the pick of Taylor Mays....genius....uh, how about Morgan Burnett?

Let's be real, the difference-maker is Harbaugh and company. And, the Niners almost threw away a slam dunk signing by lowballing his offer, allowing other teams to jump in and compete for his services. Lucky that he: 1) Wanted to stay in the Bay Area for his kid's schooling; 2) The Niners are in the Bay Area; 3) He wanted to coach for an NFL team. Again, "All Praise to Baalke" for signing Harbaugh is a joke. An elementary school negotiator could have finished this deal. Hardly genius.

I am saying right now that unless his approach changes, and we become active in free agency, instead of waiting to scrape the bargin bin basement players off the pile, this is not a long-range winning approach. The mountain of free agents on this roster is massive, and if we think we can play lowball in signing free agents this next year, in a regular NFL year (not altered by a lockout), we cannot expect more miracles to happen. Let's not roll the dice, and see what the 8th ranked CB in the free agent market does next year for this team.

I encourage those to not take this personally. This is about a philosophy to player personnel matters, not torturing puppies.


I agree that most of the turn around is due to JH and his staff, but Baalke has a bigger play in this that you have written down for him. You say get more active in free agency. Well if we did it as you say and just spend-well history has shown that spending wrecklessly has shown that it doesn't work out majority of the time, Redskins come to mind. You only spend when you are a player or two away. You can't use this year and say if we had done this we would be even better. In fact, we would be salary cap hell like the waning years of Carmen Policy. You forgetting Clements already?

Nnamdi would have cost us in the future. Franklin, we offered him what we thought he was worth but he wanted more, he didn't get an offer, we tried again, but he didn't want it, samething with Bass, and if we were to go after NA? Then try to sign Gore also? Ha. As it turned out we made the right moves. This is what he does. There is a thing called fiscal resopnsibility to the not only the owners but to the team. So that we can remain competitive not only now but into the future. You are only looking at aquisition of talent and not maintaining a competitive team which is dictated by the cap.

Bringing in Goodwin and Miller is Baalke's department which he did. As well as Braylon Edwards. Harbuagh wanted Kaep, and he brought it in at the right price. Harbuagh, gave credit after the draft for getting the players we got, he also marvaled at how Baalke remained focused when we could trade from the seventh or when we couldn't back into the first, but still ended up getting Kaep. When Seely wanted certain people for special teams, he brought in the guys that Seely recommended and then some. It was also Baalke that brought in Ackers who who is responsible for almost half the teams points. On D, He picked Aldon Smith and Culliver. Unlike his former boss, Baalke brought in a change of pace back that didn't seem like the norm of prior years with Hunter. Plus we still have Kilgore and Pearson to eveluate who may prove to be good picks. Then there is aquisitions like Dobbs and others.

Also on D, he had a vision, if Franklin left he felt Soap and Ricky would be more than able, so he would sign McDonald to a long term, all this mad more sense since Franklin was on the other side of thirty-this is called vision. He also brought in Rodgers. You may say he got lucky but he got Goldson back for a year. He also brought in Whitner. More importantly-how has the players we let go performed? That speaks for itself.

As for last year, you are forgeting that although he was in charge, like Harbaugh this year, he was restricted by two things, one was put in charge at the last minute thus operating from a hole and he was drafting people fitting Singletary's vision. You may say that he shouldn't and just draft on projected talent, but if the player doesn't fit or you don't work with the coach then it is doomed to fail. Everybody has already heard about the Taylor Mays fiasco. Besides, Walsh one of the best talent eveluators and coach, failed half the time in his picks

Yes JH wanted to remain here etc etc.-there offer was one of the richest offers to a coach and you want them to pay more than BB of the pats when at the time he is coming from the college ranks? Majority of college coaches have failed. Again Baalke assessed the situation, he knew JH wanted to stay in the Bay for multi reasons, he also knew of the teams that wanted JH, the niners had the most talent to offer thus the best chance to win. Then to top it all off, JH was familiar with Baalke and knew he could work with him compared to the Miami and Denver situations. Again, you say luck, I say Baalke knew the situation.

Baalke will pick and chose who he wants to keep next year and who to go after. Too many times players get large salaries and disappear. Like Haynesworth.
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Signing a myriad of guys to cheap one-year contracts is not the long-term solution, since we have to visit the same guys all over again. Following the pattern established by Baalke, that he is not willing to pay to build a roster, this should be a big concern. Alex Smith is not going to come cheap, neither is Rogers. And, Goldson should be ready to cash in as well. This is only the tip of the challenges the team will need to address. The list of 2012 free agents on this team is very long.

My premise is...paying the necessary dollars to a player last year like Johnathan Joseph, locks that player in for some time. The Texans, who have a better game plan and better GM, are thinking beyond this year, and beyond the bottom dollar. They are going to be good in 2012 and 2013 and 2014. I have my doubts about our team. So, while Joseph will assuredly be on the Texans roster next year, making huge contributions, our team will need to be chafty in playing the free agent game in 2012. Waiting for all the big name, big money guys to be snatched, and then hoping some guy, who is average at best, to take over, is not a smart plan.

Since we do not have a record of being aggressive in free agency (people are assuming we become Snyder and the Redskins....that is not what I am saying...it is the overall approach to being willing to pay), this team could look radically different in 2012. So, while it may appear to be a smart manuever to avoid spending money in 2011, the insecure nature of this roster, littered with free agents in 2012 is something to not be dismissed. The..."I hope he is good because he is cheap and nobody wants him" is not the right approach to take long-term. In the end, and I am thinking beyond 2011, this is a wrong direction.


Again, no one knew for sure about Rodgers, now he likes it here and has proven himself. Like McDonald, I am sure the niners will mark him as one of the need to sign. Alex would be wise not to get greedy, he knows he has success now because of a good coach. It would be stupid of him to get to greedy because he will have to start all over again. We know how that goes. Goldson may be the only one. As for others I trust Baalke will do what needs to be done. You need to realize another thing, if all the players wants is money, then he is not a team player, you want to pay them well, but not over their market value, and then they tank from getting a huge contract, just look at those players this year that haven't panned out. A good long range plan is thru the draft, sign who they really want, get some hidden gems in FA, and then if you are a player away go after that player as long as it won't hurt your future.
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Originally posted by RedWaltz24:
I thought MadDog would be up for Executive of the Year.

Thanks for the recommendation.

Let's be real people, Baalke is not the one bettering the organization, it is all Harbaugh and staff. Let's take the offense: The Niners offense has the same personnel as last year, except for a few tweeks, Miller and Goodwin. Are Miller and Goodwin making the difference in this team, compared to Baas and Norris? No. This is Harbaugh's magic, not Baalke's genius. By the way, our very own Baalke did not make a move on the offensive line this year to replace Rachal, who was the incumbent to win the job. That is genius? No.

On defense, the team let Franklin explore free agency, tried to get him back, but lost out to the Saints. The Niners shifted DL personnel, and did make one bold and aggressive move I do give credit to Baalke, signing McDonald. The rest of the front seven starting unit is the same. The secondary is largely the same, subbing Rogers for Clements, and Whitner for the R. Smith (injured) and Mays (49ers bust) combo. Rogers was a stroke of luck, not genius. We tried to bid for a number of free agents before signing him, and there was obviously no belief he would be anywhere close to as good as he has been , or he would have been the number 2 or 3 free agent CB on the market, not the 7th or 8th signed to a whopping one-year deal. Pure, blind luck, not genius.

I will tip my hat to his draft selection of Bowman last year.....right after the pick of Taylor Mays....genius....uh, how about Morgan Burnett?

Let's be real, the difference-maker is Harbaugh and company. And, the Niners almost threw away a slam dunk signing by lowballing his offer, allowing other teams to jump in and compete for his services. Lucky that he: 1) Wanted to stay in the Bay Area for his kid's schooling; 2) The Niners are in the Bay Area; 3) He wanted to coach for an NFL team. Again, "All Praise to Baalke" for signing Harbaugh is a joke. An elementary school negotiator could have finished this deal. Hardly genius.

I am saying right now that unless his approach changes, and we become active in free agency, instead of waiting to scrape the bargin bin basement players off the pile, this is not a long-range winning approach. The mountain of free agents on this roster is massive, and if we think we can play lowball in signing free agents this next year, in a regular NFL year (not altered by a lockout), we cannot expect more miracles to happen. Let's not roll the dice, and see what the 8th ranked CB in the free agent market does next year for this team.

I encourage those to not take this personally. This is about a philosophy to player personnel matters, not torturing puppies.

oh.
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 66,754
Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Signing a myriad of guys to cheap one-year contracts is not the long-term solution, since we have to visit the same guys all over again. Following the pattern established by Baalke, that he is not willing to pay to build a roster, this should be a big concern. Alex Smith is not going to come cheap, neither is Rogers. And, Goldson should be ready to cash in as well. This is only the tip of the challenges the team will need to address. The list of 2012 free agents on this team is very long.

My premise is...paying the necessary dollars to a player last year like Johnathan Joseph, locks that player in for some time. The Texans, who have a better game plan and better GM, are thinking beyond this year, and beyond the bottom dollar. They are going to be good in 2012 and 2013 and 2014. I have my doubts about our team. So, while Joseph will assuredly be on the Texans roster next year, making huge contributions, our team will need to be chafty in playing the free agent game in 2012. Waiting for all the big name, big money guys to be snatched, and then hoping some guy, who is average at best, to take over, is not a smart plan.

Since we do not have a record of being aggressive in free agency (people are assuming we become Snyder and the Redskins....that is not what I am saying...it is the overall approach to being willing to pay), this team could look radically different in 2012. So, while it may appear to be a smart manuever to avoid spending money in 2011, the insecure nature of this roster, littered with free agents in 2012 is something to not be dismissed. The..."I hope he is good because he is cheap and nobody wants him" is not the right approach to take long-term. In the end, and I am thinking beyond 2011, this is a wrong direction.


Again, no one knew for sure about Rodgers, now he likes it here and has proven himself. Like McDonald, I am sure the niners will mark him as one of the need to sign. Alex would be wise not to get greedy, he knows he has success now because of a good coach. It would be stupid of him to get to greedy because he will have to start all over again. We know how that goes. Goldson may be the only one. As for others I trust Baalke will do what needs to be done. You need to realize another thing, if all the players wants is money, then he is not a team player, you want to pay them well, but not over their market value, and then they tank from getting a huge contract, just look at those players this year that haven't panned out. A good long range plan is thru the draft, sign who they really want, get some hidden gems in FA, and then if you are a player away go after that player as long as it won't hurt your future.


Originally posted by WildBill:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Thanks for the recommendation.

Let's be real people, Baalke is not the one bettering the organization, it is all Harbaugh and staff. Let's take the offense: The Niners offense has the same personnel as last year, except for a few tweeks, Miller and Goodwin. Are Miller and Goodwin making the difference in this team, compared to Baas and Norris? No. This is Harbaugh's magic, not Baalke's genius. By the way, our very own Baalke did not make a move on the offensive line this year to replace Rachal, who was the incumbent to win the job. That is genius? No.

On defense, the team let Franklin explore free agency, tried to get him back, but lost out to the Saints. The Niners shifted DL personnel, and did make one bold and aggressive move I do give credit to Baalke, signing McDonald. The rest of the front seven starting unit is the same. The secondary is largely the same, subbing Rogers for Clements, and Whitner for the R. Smith (injured) and Mays (49ers bust) combo. Rogers was a stroke of luck, not genius. We tried to bid for a number of free agents before signing him, and there was obviously no belief he would be anywhere close to as good as he has been , or he would have been the number 2 or 3 free agent CB on the market, not the 7th or 8th signed to a whopping one-year deal. Pure, blind luck, not genius.

I will tip my hat to his draft selection of Bowman last year.....right after the pick of Taylor Mays....genius....uh, how about Morgan Burnett?

Let's be real, the difference-maker is Harbaugh and company. And, the Niners almost threw away a slam dunk signing by lowballing his offer, allowing other teams to jump in and compete for his services. Lucky that he: 1) Wanted to stay in the Bay Area for his kid's schooling; 2) The Niners are in the Bay Area; 3) He wanted to coach for an NFL team. Again, "All Praise to Baalke" for signing Harbaugh is a joke. An elementary school negotiator could have finished this deal. Hardly genius.

I am saying right now that unless his approach changes, and we become active in free agency, instead of waiting to scrape the bargin bin basement players off the pile, this is not a long-range winning approach. The mountain of free agents on this roster is massive, and if we think we can play lowball in signing free agents this next year, in a regular NFL year (not altered by a lockout), we cannot expect more miracles to happen. Let's not roll the dice, and see what the 8th ranked CB in the free agent market does next year for this team.

I encourage those to not take this personally. This is about a philosophy to player personnel matters, not torturing puppies.


I agree that most of the turn around is due to JH and his staff, but Baalke has a bigger play in this that you have written down for him. You say get more active in free agency. Well if we did it as you say and just spend-well history has shown that spending wrecklessly has shown that it doesn't work out majority of the time, Redskins come to mind. You only spend when you are a player or two away. You can't use this year and say if we had done this we would be even better. In fact, we would be salary cap hell like the waning years of Carmen Policy. You forgetting Clements already?

Nnamdi would have cost us in the future. Franklin, we offered him what we thought he was worth but he wanted more, he didn't get an offer, we tried again, but he didn't want it, samething with Bass, and if we were to go after NA? Then try to sign Gore also? Ha. As it turned out we made the right moves. This is what he does. There is a thing called fiscal resopnsibility to the not only the owners but to the team. So that we can remain competitive not only now but into the future. You are only looking at aquisition of talent and not maintaining a competitive team which is dictated by the cap.

Bringing in Goodwin and Miller is Baalke's department which he did. As well as Braylon Edwards. Harbuagh wanted Kaep, and he brought it in at the right price. Harbuagh, gave credit after the draft for getting the players we got, he also marvaled at how Baalke remained focused when we could trade from the seventh or when we couldn't back into the first, but still ended up getting Kaep. When Seely wanted certain people for special teams, he brought in the guys that Seely recommended and then some. It was also Baalke that brought in Ackers who who is responsible for almost half the teams points. On D, He picked Aldon Smith and Culliver. Unlike his former boss, Baalke brought in a change of pace back that didn't seem like the norm of prior years with Hunter. Plus we still have Kilgore and Pearson to eveluate who may prove to be good picks. Then there is aquisitions like Dobbs and others.

Also on D, he had a vision, if Franklin left he felt Soap and Ricky would be more than able, so he would sign McDonald to a long term, all this mad more sense since Franklin was on the other side of thirty-this is called vision. He also brought in Rodgers. You may say he got lucky but he got Goldson back for a year. He also brought in Whitner. More importantly-how has the players we let go performed? That speaks for itself.

As for last year, you are forgeting that although he was in charge, like Harbaugh this year, he was restricted by two things, one was put in charge at the last minute thus operating from a hole and he was drafting people fitting Singletary's vision. You may say that he shouldn't and just draft on projected talent, but if the player doesn't fit or you don't work with the coach then it is doomed to fail. Everybody has already heard about the Taylor Mays fiasco. Besides, Walsh one of the best talent eveluators and coach, failed half the time in his picks

Yes JH wanted to remain here etc etc.-there offer was one of the richest offers to a coach and you want them to pay more than BB of the pats when at the time he is coming from the college ranks? Majority of college coaches have failed. Again Baalke assessed the situation, he knew JH wanted to stay in the Bay for multi reasons, he also knew of the teams that wanted JH, the niners had the most talent to offer thus the best chance to win. Then to top it all off, JH was familiar with Baalke and knew he could work with him compared to the Miami and Denver situations. Again, you say luck, I say Baalke knew the situation.

Baalke will pick and chose who he wants to keep next year and who to go after. Too many times players get large salaries and disappear. Like Haynesworth.

Good post WildBill, I agree. Only move I disagree with was trading up for Kaepernick.
Originally posted by Wodwo:
Originally posted by buck:
Nice read on Baalke and Harbaugh.

"Patience is important: Unlike what you see in some places, the Niners didn't slobber all over their No. 1 candidate last offseason. In fact, San Francisco management thought it was important for Harbaugh to investigate all his options -- most notably at Michigan and with the Dolphins -- because, as I understand it, they wanted the coach to be all-in and "didn't want second thoughts."

"As it turns out, the roster that Baalke, as assistant GM, had helped ex-GM Scot McCloughan build was pretty sturdy. And so was the relationship that Baalke built with Harbaugh, something those involved in the process were smart enough to see coming."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82435931/article/niners-success-rooted-in-chemistry-created-during-lockout

I LOVE THIS TEAM!

My favorite part of the whole offseason/FA/draft is that both Baalke and Harbaugh said...

"We do have a plan."

I thought that was awesome. They showed complete confidence in each other and in themselves, while at the same time telling the media nothing.

So many people laughed at that statement. I wasn't laughing... I believed it. I got laughed at for it, too.

The best part, though? They've far exceeded my expectations.

I think its safe to say they have far exceeded any of our expectations.

And you're absolutely correct, they both said that they had a plan, and neither of them divulged any of that plan to the media/world.

I am so impressed with the results of the plan. And I'm looking forward to seeing alot more of such results in the future.

Go Niners.

Originally posted by candlestick49er:
Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Let's be real people, Baalke is not the one bettering the organization, it is all Harbaugh and staff. Let's take the offense: The Niners offense has the same personnel as last year, except for a few tweeks, Miller and Goodwin. Are Miller and Goodwin making the difference in this team, compared to Baas and Norris? No. This is Harbaugh's magic, not Baalke's genius. By the way, our very own Baalke did not make a move on the offensive line this year to replace Rachal, who was the incumbent to win the job. That is genius? No.

1) Baalke identified Harbaugh as the best candidate to be our HC. His projection of Harbaugh being a good NFL coach was correct. Remember, Harbaugh wasn't guaranteed to be a great hire. There were some doubts that Harbaugh's success would translate to the pros. Baalke deserves credit for getting his guy and making the right decision with the hire.

2) A bad GM would have cleaned house. Baalke recognized that we had offensive talent on the roster and kept it in place. Its not a groundbreaking move, but its a move that separates good GMs from bad GMs. A good GM maintains talent and a bad GM gets rid of talent for the sake of cleaning house. MadDog, in your opinion, what could Baalke have done better here?

3) Rachal was replaced by a player already on the roster. The solid play of Snyder shows that addressing the o-line with an outside player would have been unnecessary. Our o-line is playing well with the players Baalke kept...so what's wrong with his decision not to acquire Rachal's replacement?


Originally posted by MadDog49er:
On defense, the team let Franklin explore free agency, tried to get him back, but lost out to the Saints. The Niners shifted DL personnel, and did make one bold and aggressive move I do give credit to Baalke, signing McDonald. The rest of the front seven starting unit is the same. The secondary is largely the same, subbing Rogers for Clements, and Whitner for the R. Smith (injured) and Mays (49ers bust) combo. Rogers was a stroke of luck, not genius. We tried to bid for a number of free agents before signing him, and there was obviously no belief he would be anywhere close to as good as he has been , or he would have been the number 2 or 3 free agent CB on the market, not the 7th or 8th signed to a whopping one-year deal. Pure, blind luck, not genius.

1) As another poster stated previously, MORE THAN HALF of the defensive starters are different this year. The changes made to our defense were UPGRADES. Not to mention, they weren't obvious upgrades. Baalke let good/proven players go and replaced them with better/unproven players. Baalke deserves credit for this.

2) Your stance on the Carlos Rogers move being lucky is nothing but speculation. Do you know the actual order Baalke ranked the free agent CBs? If you don't, then stop insisting that Rogers was the 7th or 8th rated CB on his radar. Unless you know how he ranked these players, your idea of Baalke benefiting from "blind luck" is meaningless because there's no credibility there.


Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I will tip my hat to his draft selection of Bowman last year.....right after the pick of Taylor Mays....genius....uh, how about Morgan Burnett?

I will tip my hat to the draft selection of Montana in 1979...right after the pick of James Owens...genius...uh, how about Mark Gastineau?

My point: EVERYBODY hits, misses, or could have drafted a better player.


Originally posted by MadDog49er:
Let's be real, the difference-maker is Harbaugh and company. And, the Niners almost threw away a slam dunk signing by lowballing his offer, allowing other teams to jump in and compete for his services. Lucky that he: 1) Wanted to stay in the Bay Area for his kid's schooling; 2) The Niners are in the Bay Area; 3) He wanted to coach for an NFL team. Again, "All Praise to Baalke" for signing Harbaugh is a joke. An elementary school negotiator could have finished this deal. Hardly genius.

1) Much like free agents, the Niners offered Harbaugh what they felt he was worth and stuck to their offer. They could have easily over-payed for him, but instead got him at a fair deal. MadDog, whats the negative here?

2) Baalke letting Harbaugh explore all his options was a smart move (and a move that most GMs would have been afraid to do). It shows that Baalke wanted to hire a coach who absolutely wanted to be here. That's a great thing in my opinion. A good GM should be certain that his guy is here for the long haul. Does Nick Saban ring a bell? By giving Harbaugh an opportunity to weigh out his options, he knew he would get a guy who was SURE he wanted to be here if he decided to be our HC.

3) Another thing you haven't considered is Baalke's ability to communicate. Any GM could offer money to get their guy (like what the Dolphins tried to do), but where's the skill in that? According to you, the Niners tried to "lowball" Harbaugh's offer...so obviously Baalke didn't have an edge as far as money is concerned. He had to sell his vision to Harbaugh. After Harbaugh decided to be our coach, he claimed that he liked Baalke's vision and he felt comfortable with him because he also was a "football guy". You brought up several reasons why Harbaugh would want to come to the Niners, but I believe Baalke and his vision for the team is what ultimately landed our coach.


Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I am saying right now that unless his approach changes, and we become active in free agency, instead of waiting to scrape the bargin bin basement players off the pile, this is not a long-range winning approach. The mountain of free agents on this roster is massive, and if we think we can play lowball in signing free agents this next year, in a regular NFL year (not altered by a lockout), we cannot expect more miracles to happen. Let's not roll the dice, and see what the 8th ranked CB in the free agent market does next year for this team.

1) There's a difference between being active and overly aggressive in free agency. Being ACTIVE is attempting to acquire targeted players, but only at their value. Being OVERLY AGGRESSIVE is attempting to acquire targeted players, and willing to overpay regardless of value. We HAVE been active in free agency. We bid for Nnamdi, but didn't overpay. No, we didn't get him...but the point is that we DID make an attempt to get him. The Niners signed several players this offseason. We didn't make a splash in free agency but you can't say we weren't active.

2) I disagree that Baalke's approach is to "wait to scrape the bargain bin". I believe he wants to get guys according to their value.


Originally posted by MadDog49er:
I encourage those to not take this personally. This is about a philosophy to player personnel matters, not torturing puppies.

You're entitled to your opinion and I respect it. As far as philosophies to player personnel matters, there isn't a blueprint to success. We have seen the "aggressive free agency" approach work (1994 49ers) and fail (Synder's Redskins). We have seen the "build through the draft/add FA depth" approach work (00s Patriots/Packers) and fail (00s Browns).

As you can see, both styles work sometimes and fail sometimes. So far, Baalke's approach (which you disagree with) IS working and the Eagles' approach (which you agree with) is NOT working. Like I said before, I respect your opinion...but why do you think Baalke's style is such a bad way to go about things when it has delivered mostly positive results? Other than the fact that things haven't gone like you predicted, I don't see how anybody can knock Baalke right now.

MadDog, thoughts?

I'm also interested in your response to the posts made by BrianGO, PTulini, and WildBill.
lol some people just like to hate on Baalke. Signing players to 1 year deals in a short offseason isn't a bad thing. Now that the Niners are winning they will be more capable to signing the big free agents who want to go to a team that has a chance at the championship. Also most of the players only wanted 1 year deals if they counldn't land the big deal.

The simple fact is Baalke has done a great job so far. His past draft looks like a solid A++ when some people on here were butthurt and gave the draft a C or in some cases an F.
Originally posted by miked1978:
lol some people just like to hate on Baalke. Signing players to 1 year deals in a short offseason isn't a bad thing. Now that the Niners are winning they will be more capable to signing the big free agents who want to go to a team that has a chance at the championship. Also most of the players only wanted 1 year deals if they counldn't land the big deal.

The simple fact is Baalke has done a great job so far. His past draft looks like a solid A++ when some people on here were butthurt and gave the draft a C or in some cases an F.
And didn't/doesn't the new CBA have some effect on FA? The new CBA requires teams to pay something like $125M in roster salaries per year, but doesn't fully kick in until next year, and then goes to $150M the year after. So this year is one where the clubs could save some money AND get a better idea of what vets they want to sign for long term contracts once they are required to do so.

Rather than jumping in and signing some big name guy to a long term contract that the new CBA might require living up to (i.e., Clements) down the road, thus hamstringing the team's ability to juggle the roster in the long term, Baalke signed a bunch of guys to one year contracts. This gives Harbaugh a year to evaluate the talent on the roster one full year before the CBA might require signing guys to bigger, longer contracts.

So in addition to showing some real ability for picking football talent, Baalke has shown some excellent business sense, too.

It seems, to me, that alot of thought and work went into the "plan" before it was executed. That's not as easy as just mindlessly throwing money at some big name FA, which may impress a few "fans," but really isn't in the best, long term intersts of the team. IMHO.
Akers and Aldon were ballin on Monday. Two biggest pick ups of the off season for Baalke.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone