-
qnnhan7
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 34,146
Originally posted by Godsleftsock:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
Originally posted by ads_2006:
smith read the wrong coverage
yeah, classic. My favorite part though is that beating the Bucs 48-3 was an "underwhelming blowout." LMFAO. Give me a break. Your QB has about 1/3 of his completions go for touchdowns and you score constantly on short fields because your defense is so dominant against a 3-1 team and its "underwhelming."
and "their schedule has been favorable so far."
Its pretty clear that the requirement to earn money as a football expert you have to have as little knowledge of football as possible.
Sounds like Mancini never watched the game, just looked at the stats
I honestly took that as a compliment from Mangini. His point was it wasn't your classic blowout when you look at the stats after the game. Yet we dominated the Bucs. I think Magini wasn't putting us down, but marveled at the way we dominated them as a team in all phase with minimalist effort on passing offense.
-
Snider8706
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,368
I think I fell into a hot tub time machine and got sent to the 80's I'm not used to hearing people say stuff like that.
-
HessianDud
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 22,995
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by Godsleftsock:
Originally posted by HessianDud:
Originally posted by ads_2006:
smith read the wrong coverage
yeah, classic. My favorite part though is that beating the Bucs 48-3 was an "underwhelming blowout." LMFAO. Give me a break. Your QB has about 1/3 of his completions go for touchdowns and you score constantly on short fields because your defense is so dominant against a 3-1 team and its "underwhelming."
and "their schedule has been favorable so far."
Its pretty clear that the requirement to earn money as a football expert you have to have as little knowledge of football as possible.
Sounds like Mancini never watched the game, just looked at the stats
I honestly took that as a compliment from Mangini. His point was it wasn't your classic blowout when you look at the stats after the game. Yet we dominated the Bucs. I think Magini wasn't putting us down, but marveled at the way we dominated them as a team in all phase with minimalist effort on passing offense.
it could be taken that way, I guess, but when I watched it I thought it was in the middle of him talking about how we might be a mirage.
-
overthemiddle
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 653
There is a chance that we can. Personally I think we can even beat the Packers. We arnt at their level but with an outstanding performance they could.
-
TheRambler
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 38,327
Originally posted by Garcia:
he didnt say that either
He said the 49ers COULD win every game.
This
-
BimmerKing
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 21,823
Originally posted by overthemiddle:
There is a chance that we can. Personally I think we can even beat the Packers. We arnt at their level but with an outstanding performance they could.
Thats a lil too far. I dont think our secondary is good enough to stop Aaron and those receievers
-
SonocoNinerFan
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 17,581
Skip Bayless is a genius . . . today . . .
-
kstolai
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 11,313
Originally posted by ads_2006:
smith read the wrong coverage
In the end a mute argument!
-
PatrickWillisHOF
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 1,961
Every team has a couple of bad games every year. We will lose a couple more. But lets just make it to the playoffs!!!!!!!
-
ninersrule4
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 19,580
Haha get f**ked skip that ain't happening
-
AXEGRINDER
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 25,671
sorry but i can see why Mangini isn't coaching anymore. 10-6? gtfo
-
schmons
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,145
Originally posted by GuessWhosOn3rd:
Originally posted by overthemiddle:
There is a chance that we can. Personally I think we can even beat the Packers. We arnt at their level but with an outstanding performance they could.
Thats a lil too far. I dont think our secondary is good enough to stop Aaron and those receievers
do you think their o-line can holdup sf's d-line?
-
Memphis9er
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 12,247
Originally posted by schmons:
Originally posted by GuessWhosOn3rd:
Originally posted by overthemiddle:
There is a chance that we can. Personally I think we can even beat the Packers. We arnt at their level but with an outstanding performance they could.
Thats a lil too far. I dont think our secondary is good enough to stop Aaron and those receievers
do you think their o-line can holdup sf's d-line?
Nope, I would love to see Aldon grind Rodgers into the turf like a used up cigaret butt.
-
fanmusclecars
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 9,176
Originally posted by sincalfaithful:
Not gonna happen but Im loving all the hype we are getting its been way too long since I've heard things like this about our team
This
-
AXEGRINDER
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 25,671
in all seriousness our D-line is borderline becoming epic. Tops in the league epic. 2007 Giants epic. Jim Tomsula epic. 5 sacks on stafford with a 4 man rush. Ya got me?