49ers vs. Raiders Tickets Available! →

There are 1,130 users in the forums

Even Ken Dorsey could beat the next two teams with ease

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:01 PM
WHINER TALK
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:09 PM
Originally posted by LambdaChi49:
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
It really doesn't matter who starts, or who should play etc.

Whomever the qb is , is going to look good against these sorry ass teams.


''Start Nate Davis nom nom nom!''

Why?

Do you want a false qb controversy between whomever vs Smith?

I don't.

I'd rather keep Smith in , let him throw for 300 yards, and have Davis and Crabs have a field day.

but.. Singletary said he was strongly thinking about giving some 2nd and 3rd stringers some experience so... we still might see Nate Davis.

Personally I hope Smith sucks up the joint these next 2 weeks. The seasons already over and it's best that we realize this year that Alex is a lemon before we waste another season on him.


Wow. So you'd rather the Niners lose just so the guy you have disturbing hate against gets the boot?

I dont understand this type of hate towards Smith. Did he fvck your gf or your wife and send you the tape? Did he kill and eat your dog? Did he try to fondle you in the locker room or something?

I just dont get it.

I agree , we have some idiots that post here .
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM
this is seriously a useless thread. It's just being made so if alex does good then there will be something to go back on and be like no and this why.
I hope we go 2-0 these last two weeks
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Even if Alex tears it up against the Lions and Rams I still won't have confidence in him. The only good defense he went up against he got destroyed.

You're right the AZ defense that held AP to 35 yards and defeated the Vikings clearly was not a good defense.

You're right. They clearly are not a good defense. Get a clue Brosuph Islam.

Defeated the Vikings? We lost that game. Favre threw for 300 yards BTW. The only reason we are in the game is because of special teams. Its because they blocked a FG at the half and Clements ran it back for a TD. A 10 point swing.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:22 PM
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Even if Alex tears it up against the Lions and Rams I still won't have confidence in him. The only good defense he went up against he got destroyed.

You're right the AZ defense that held AP to 35 yards and defeated the Vikings clearly was not a good defense.

You're right. They clearly are not a good defense. Get a clue Brosuph Islam.

Defeated the Vikings? We lost that game. Favre threw for 300 yards BTW. The only reason we are in the game is because of special teams. Its because they blocked a FG at the half and Clements ran it back for a TD. A 10 point swing.

you clearly have a reading comprehension problem. Arizona beat the Vikings correct? Yes, yes they did. Ok that was just a hint. I am sure you can figure the rest out.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Originally posted by CornellU49er:
Originally posted by bigmike55:
How many more years do we miss the playoffs before we realize Alex Smith is not and never will be an elite QB in the NFL. We've all seen it, the entire league knows that. He may be decent career backup, but from what I've seen, he shines at times, but stinks it up again and again.

If you guys are willing to not make the playoffs for another 5 years to develop Alex Smith, sure... keep him around. Let's wait till he's 30 before he finally gets it.

I don't know about you guys, but I'm sick of losing man... I'm sick of almost winning.. We keep saying, "there's always next year" This is a win now league, and Alex Smith cannot win now.

I, like most of us, am still very much on the fence regarding Alex. However, whether or not he is the future, there is no question in my mind he gives us the best chance to go to the playoffs in 2010. Let Nate sit one more season and continue to maintain continuity with Johnson taking over for Raye in 2011. If we fail to make the playoffs next year, Alex should be cut, we draft another QB, and start Nate in 2011.

The answer is NOT to clean house and start all over. I want to win next year.

CO-SIGN!




AND LETS NOT FORGET FOLKS, EVEN TRENT DILFER WON A SUPER BOWL.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:33 PM
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Even if Alex tears it up against the Lions and Rams I still won't have confidence in him. The only good defense he went up against he got destroyed.

You're right the AZ defense that held AP to 35 yards and defeated the Vikings clearly was not a good defense.

You're right. They clearly are not a good defense. Get a clue Brosuph Islam.

Defeated the Vikings? We lost that game. Favre threw for 300 yards BTW. The only reason we are in the game is because of special teams. Its because they blocked a FG at the half and Clements ran it back for a TD. A 10 point swing.

you clearly have a reading comprehension problem. Arizona beat the Vikings correct? Yes, yes they did. Ok that was just a hint. I am sure you can figure the rest out.

Yes, I did miss that. That's what I get for even opening a thread title as worthless as this one.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:39 PM
Alex better adjust to being a more efficient QG under center and not only out of the shotgun. The line hasn't helped him a lot but he is still not making throws that he should hit on target, or reads, hopefully with the offseason he gets better at that and the oline does also but going into next year he should be on a short leash because if he doesn't pan out eventually we have to cut our losses and move one.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Even if Alex tears it up against the Lions and Rams I still won't have confidence in him. The only good defense he went up against he got destroyed.

You're right the AZ defense that held AP to 35 yards and defeated the Vikings clearly was not a good defense.

You're right. They clearly are not a good defense. Get a clue Brosuph Islam.

Defeated the Vikings? We lost that game. Favre threw for 300 yards BTW. The only reason we are in the game is because of special teams. Its because they blocked a FG at the half and Clements ran it back for a TD. A 10 point swing.

you clearly have a reading comprehension problem. Arizona beat the Vikings correct? Yes, yes they did. Ok that was just a hint. I am sure you can figure the rest out.

Yes, I did miss that. That's what I get for even opening a thread title as worthless as this one.

well at least you learned. Now maybe you will think about it before starting a thread and save the rest of us the pain of having to read your posts.
Dec 23, 2009 at 6:49 PM
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by TonyStarks:
It really doesn't matter who starts, or who should play etc.

Whomever the qb is , is going to look good against these sorry ass teams.


''Start Nate Davis nom nom nom!''

Why?

Do you want a false qb controversy between whomever vs Smith?

I don't.

I'd rather keep Smith in , let him throw for 300 yards, and have Davis and Crabs have a field day.

but.. Singletary said he was strongly thinking about giving some 2nd and 3rd stringers some experience so... we still might see Nate Davis.

Personally I hope Smith sucks up the joint these next 2 weeks. The seasons already over and it's best that we realize this year that Alex is a lemon before we waste another season on him.
I see the metrosexual haters are out in full force!
Dec 23, 2009 at 8:15 PM
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Experience is the best teacher

Really? So you think it was a good decision in 2005 from the 49ers to start Alex Smith against the Colts in his first game? Smith never should have played a snap in 2005.
Dec 23, 2009 at 8:29 PM
  • Kolohe
  • Hall of Fame
  • Posts: 67,466
Originally posted by Icelandic49er:
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Experience is the best teacher

Really? So you think it was a good decision in 2005 from the 49ers to start Alex Smith against the Colts in his first game? Smith never should have played a snap in 2005.

And why not, Matt Ryan did it, Joe Flacco, Peyton Manning, Eli Manning, Carson Palmer. Experience is the best teacher, fact is, you never know how its gonna turn out when you start'em.
Dec 23, 2009 at 8:58 PM
Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
I've been bashing Smith since day 1 but am ready to roll with him after a year of continuity.

He's passing at a 60% clip, has more tds than ints with two games left.

This is 2006 entering 2007 all over again...we just need to get an oline to protect his skinny ass and prevent deja vu!

MORE TD'S THAN INT'S ... and that's saying a LOT?

So did Tim Rattay ....! Maybe the 49er's should have kept him if that's the case!

http://www.nfl.com/players/timrattay/profile?id=RAT659964
[ Edited by Kauaiguy on Dec 23, 2009 at 9:03 PM ]
Dec 24, 2009 at 9:50 AM
Originally posted by Kauaiguy:
Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
I've been bashing Smith since day 1 but am ready to roll with him after a year of continuity.

He's passing at a 60% clip, has more tds than ints with two games left.

This is 2006 entering 2007 all over again...we just need to get an oline to protect his skinny ass and prevent deja vu!

MORE TD'S THAN INT'S ... and that's saying a LOT?

So did Tim Rattay ....! Maybe the 49er's should have kept him if that's the case!

http://www.nfl.com/players/timrattay/profile?id=RAT659964

dont tell afrikan he wants tim rattay starting next year
Dec 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by Gavintech:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Originally posted by backontop:
Originally posted by WheresWaldo:
Even if Alex tears it up against the Lions and Rams I still won't have confidence in him. The only good defense he went up against he got destroyed.

You're right the AZ defense that held AP to 35 yards and defeated the Vikings clearly was not a good defense.

You're right. They clearly are not a good defense. Get a clue Brosuph Islam.

Defeated the Vikings? We lost that game. Favre threw for 300 yards BTW. The only reason we are in the game is because of special teams. Its because they blocked a FG at the half and Clements ran it back for a TD. A 10 point swing.

you clearly have a reading comprehension problem. Arizona beat the Vikings correct? Yes, yes they did. Ok that was just a hint. I am sure you can figure the rest out.

Yes, I did miss that. That's what I get for even opening a thread title as worthless as this one.

well at least you learned. Now maybe you will think about it before starting a thread and save the rest of us the pain of having to read your posts.

I have and will never start a thread.
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone