Originally posted by yoyo49:
Originally posted by Afrikan:
Originally posted by fister30:
Originally posted by oldman9er:
Originally posted by fister30:
The fix is in. I am convinced the starting job will be handed to Smith this year.
Haha, knew it was a short matter of time before the Alex-haters/Hill-lovers started making their Hillexcuses. Gimme a break... McC and Sing will select the QB that they feel gives SF the best chance to succeed in September. They are not gonna play favorites over best chance at immediate success.
I'm not actually an Alex hater. I will be cheering for whoever takes snaps under center next year. I find it humorous that a competition had to be used to give Alex the starting job. I am accusing the staff/management of trying to sway public opinion to do something I think they were planning all along. This has nothing to do with Alex's or Hill's performance.
There is a big push in the local media to try to convince 49er fans that Alex is an OK guy. Look at some of the recent headlines. The article I found most obvious was stating that Alex should get the respect he is do for coming back the way that he did. I have posted in the past about how I felt this competition was not really a competition. I can explain it again if you would like me to.
I think Hill will be the starter at the start of the season.... I am just more worried about our backup QB situation..... that is where I feel a fix would be in.... We will all witness it during the preseason....if Damon Huard outplays Alex during the preseason....will he be rewarded the backup roll....will the 49ers do what is best for the 49ers....
....I don't think so.
I know a lot of people assume that Smith is just going to lay a fat rotten egg during preseason. Some even think he will look so bad that he won't even be worthy of 3rd string.
But let me ask you this, what if Smith outplays everyone and looks like the best QB during preseason. Would you or any of the other "haters" be OK with Smith being rewarded the starting job or would you stick to your guns and still want him to ride the bench because of past performances.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that you seem ready to demote Smith to 3rd string if he plays poorly, but would you be just as ready to promote him to starter if he plays great in preseason. Or do we have a double standard going here?
I don't know if Alex will lay a fat egg...hell I think he will do ok....u know like in 2007...we run, we run, playaction Alex hits someone open....and so on....
but I just think, judging Damon Huard's past starting experience and how he was starting for the Chiefs the same way Hill had to work his way into the starting role.... Huard did really good for a team with no WRs....and also did fine with the Dolphins awhile back.....so its more, me seeing more good QB play from Huard than Alex really.....is that crazy to expect Huard to outplay Alex?
as far as Alex outplaying everyone....if he plays great....u know like 3-4 straight pass plays....sustains 1st downs and scores TDs....and just looks totally different and Hill stinks it up.....well then Alex should start.... I'm a Hill fan...but I'm not blind....I want what is best for my 9ers....I just hope that if Hill is struggling that Alex is brought out in the 1st quarter in several preseason games...and plays against starting defenses....and shows he is ready for teams during the regular season.