Shedeur Sanders Anyone ?

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

I'm glad he got a chance The running to minimize losses on broken plays was a plus.

this game didn't prove the conspiracy that the NFL is holding back a 1st or 2nd rd rookie bc of feelings

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

Yup, because Shedeur's 4 was higher quality that DG's 7. And again, Shedeur got NO reps in practice even as the #2 QB - NONE!!!! That's not normal. So yes, Shedeur's 4 for 16 was better than DG 7 for 10. Keep in mind that to this point DG has gotten ALL the 1st team reps since training camp. Shedeur has gotten 0, and again, the starting O-line heard Shedeur's cadence or the first time today.

There was a reason that DG was booed multiple times, in the 1st quarter, then in the 2nd quarter. He was missing wide open receivers. It wasn't even close. Shedeur didn't miss like that.

So bring it Hall of Famer.

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

Yup, because Shedeur's 4 was higher quality that DG's 7. And again, Shedeur got NO reps in practice even as the #2 QB - NONE!!!! That's not normal. So yes, Shedeur's 4 for 16 was better than DG 7 for 10. Keep in mind that to this point DG has gotten ALL the 1st team reps since training camp. Shedeur has gotten 0, and again, the starting O-line heard Shedeur's cadence or the first time today.

There was a reason that DG was booed multiple times, in the 1st quarter, then in the 2nd quarter. He was missing wide open receivers. It wasn't even close. Shedeur didn't miss like that.

Dude was 4/16 and he tried to throw at least one more interception. The reps excuse might explain a poor performance, but it was a poor performance. He looked like a cheap Russel Wilson knock-off without the magic. He might well improve, but he was slow in processing, and erratic in throwing. Again, he has excuses that might be valid, but his actual performance didn't suggest anything particularly interesting to my eye.

Sanders going to shred us for 500 yards in two weeks and the media will go crazy.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Sanders going to shred us for 500 yards in two weeks and the media will go crazy.

Nightmare fuel.

I'd show up here and take my lumps from 9ersLiferInChicago though.

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

Yup, because Shedeur's 4 was higher quality that DG's 7. And again, Shedeur got NO reps in practice even as the #2 QB - NONE!!!! That's not normal. So yes, Shedeur's 4 for 16 was better than DG 7 for 10. Keep in mind that to this point DG has gotten ALL the 1st team reps since training camp. Shedeur has gotten 0, and again, the starting O-line heard Shedeur's cadence or the first time today.

There was a reason that DG was booed multiple times, in the 1st quarter, then in the 2nd quarter. He was missing wide open receivers. It wasn't even close. Shedeur didn't miss like that.

So bring it Hall of Famer.

Higher quality? Sanders completed 25% of his passes for 2.9 YPA, threw a pick, and got sacked twice.

That is literally, objectively worse than Gabriel in every category. Less completions, more attempts, less yards, more picks, more sacks.

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

Yup, because Shedeur's 4 was higher quality that DG's 7. And again, Shedeur got NO reps in practice even as the #2 QB - NONE!!!! That's not normal. So yes, Shedeur's 4 for 16 was better than DG 7 for 10. Keep in mind that to this point DG has gotten ALL the 1st team reps since training camp. Shedeur has gotten 0, and again, the starting O-line heard Shedeur's cadence or the first time today.

There was a reason that DG was booed multiple times, in the 1st quarter, then in the 2nd quarter. He was missing wide open receivers. It wasn't even close. Shedeur didn't miss like that.

So bring it Hall of Famer.

This is a moon level take.

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Sanders going to shred us for 500 yards in two weeks and the media will go crazy.

Please, no

Maybe 5 th round was a reach ?

Originally posted by Midbay:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Can someone do a welfare check on 9ersLiferInChicago?

Oh, I'm, here. Tell me, How many reps did Shedeur get with the 1st team, or even the 2nd team? And even with the pick Shedeur STILL looked better than DG. Dillan don't even look like an NFL QB with ALL the reps. But Shedeur at least look like an NFL QB even with NO reps. Shedeur said that his pass to Jerry Jeudy was the first time he even through a pass to him, EVER!!

Hell, the O-line said that they never heard Shedeur's cadence. The fact that Shedeur got no practice reps at all at no time during the regular season, and the O-line never heard Shedeur's cadence, yet still looked better than DG speaks volumes, about a lot of things. The play-call looked VASTLY different with Shedeur in the game than DG.

So, I'm ready for the smoke

4 for 16 is better than 7 for 10?

Yup, because Shedeur's 4 was higher quality that DG's 7. And again, Shedeur got NO reps in practice even as the #2 QB - NONE!!!! That's not normal. So yes, Shedeur's 4 for 16 was better than DG 7 for 10. Keep in mind that to this point DG has gotten ALL the 1st team reps since training camp. Shedeur has gotten 0, and again, the starting O-line heard Shedeur's cadence or the first time today.

There was a reason that DG was booed multiple times, in the 1st quarter, then in the 2nd quarter. He was missing wide open receivers. It wasn't even close. Shedeur didn't miss like that.

Dude was 4/16 and he tried to throw at least one more interception. The reps excuse might explain a poor performance, but it was a poor performance. He looked like a cheap Russel Wilson knock-off without the magic. He might well improve, but he was slow in processing, and erratic in throwing. Again, he has excuses that might be valid, but his actual performance didn't suggest anything particularly interesting to my eye.

We shale see

Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Maybe 5 th round was a reach ?

We shale see

9ersLiferInChicago has a lot of emotional investment in the success of Shadeur. It's a weird hill to die on for a Niner fan. Like, who cares? lol.