Los Angeles Chargers QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49ersFan_vienna:

Originally posted by BP22:

I would love to see Trey start for SF, but from all I've deduced, the next man up after Purdy will be Darnold. I think the FO doesn't want Trey's cap hit on the roster for next season. with Purdy and Darnold, who Kyle loves, they have $10,851,673 reasons to part with Trey.

i would love for Lance to get a fair chance before they crown Purdy who throws picks after picks.

Huh?

13/4 Td/Int is good as is a 2.4 int %.

Training camp >>>> than actual games.

Get with the program.

LOL

Originally posted by Koldo:

Originally posted by 49ersFan_vienna:
i would love for Lance to get a fair chance before they crown Purdy who throws picks after picks.

I thought that was good too, can't tell if he's serious or just having fun but either way.. well played lol

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by Koldo:

Originally posted by 49ersFan_vienna:
i would love for Lance to get a fair chance before they crown Purdy who throws picks after picks.

I thought that was good too, can't tell if he's serious or just having fun but either way.. well played lol

Unintentional comedy is pure gold.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, it was when your number is called, you have to ball. JG did, see 2017, and that is ancient history. Who know how his career goes, if he struggled in 2017, but that's another topic. If TL was playing like an All-Pro to start last season, this convo, is different in terms of QB1. Would you not agree?

It's actually hilarious that you bring up Jimmy in 2017. Just like Trey Lance, Jimmy's first start was against the Bears and he didn't score a touchdown. Then in Jimmy's 2nd start, he didn't score a touchdown until the end of 3rd quarter. So Jimmy didn't score a touchdown in his first SIX quarters as our starter.

But as you said, you can't go five quarters without scoring a touchdown, right?

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, it was when your number is called, you have to ball. JG did, see 2017, and that is ancient history. Who know how his career goes, if he struggled in 2017, but that's another topic. If TL was playing like an All-Pro to start last season, this convo, is different in terms of QB1. Would you not agree?

It's actually hilarious that you bring up Jimmy in 2017. Just like Trey Lance, Jimmy's first start was against the Bears and he didn't score a touchdown. Then in Jimmy's 2nd start, he didn't score a touchdown until the end of 3rd quarter. So Jimmy didn't score a touchdown in his first SIX quarters as our starter.

But as you said, you can't go five quarters without scoring a touchdown, right?

SWH, you are missing the forest, for the trees here. The point was you have to ball, when called upon. That's the entire point. BP did (in a huge way). It's the entire reason he's QB1, and TL isn't, in my view. NFL is a real quick and can be cold business. I didn't bring up JG. You did.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, it was when your number is called, you have to ball. JG did, see 2017, and that is ancient history. Who know how his career goes, if he struggled in 2017, but that's another topic. If TL was playing like an All-Pro to start last season, this convo, is different in terms of QB1. Would you not agree?

It's actually hilarious that you bring up Jimmy in 2017. Just like Trey Lance, Jimmy's first start was against the Bears and he didn't score a touchdown. Then in Jimmy's 2nd start, he didn't score a touchdown until the end of 3rd quarter. So Jimmy didn't score a touchdown in his first SIX quarters as our starter.

But as you said, you can't go five quarters without scoring a touchdown, right?

Originally posted by Koldo:
Unintentional comedy is pure gold.

Indeed.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by libertyforever:

Originally posted by 49ersFan_vienna:

Originally posted by BP22:
I would love to see Trey start for SF, but from all I've deduced, the next man up after Purdy will be Darnold. I think the FO doesn't want Trey's cap hit on the roster for next season. with Purdy and Darnold, who Kyle loves, they have $10,851,673 reasons to part with Trey.

i would love for Lance to get a fair chance before they crown Purdy who throws picks after picks.

Trey was given the QB1 role with no competition last season so he had his chances. He just didn't capitalized, unlike Brock.

this is an often overlooked point, when your number is called, you have to ball. You can't go 5 qtrs, with zero TDs. So that opened it up for BP, and BP was on fire the whole year. NFL = not for long. TL has chances still, but he has to play well. Let's see a new an improved TL in preseason, he can make the whole league take notice if he is out there throwing lasers on Sunday, lighting it up. 3-4 real darn good QBs, would be a good prob to have

It's an often overlooked point, because its a stupid one. Jimmy G has gone 5 quarters without a touchdown multiple times in his 49er tenure, including last season. Didnt hear you say that "you cant do that" when it came to him. This is also ignoring the fact that 4 of the 5 quarters, Trey played in the rain.

If that 5 quarters happen to be the only action for the whole last season, then that would be a bigger concern for fans. And if the player doesn't have much of other good game performance in the NFL, then that would make it even worse. So I don't think comparing that to Jimmy G makes any sense whatsoever.

The poster said "you cant go 5 qtrs, with zero TDs." Many QBs have done that, including the guy who he has made excuses for, for years.

If you want to make this exclusive to Trey Lance, because he didnt play after that and didnt play much as a rookie, thats a you problem. And what you are doing is completely ignoring all context in order to come to that conclusion. Plenty of QBs have gone 5 quarters without a touchdown. It happens to everyone at times.

Its fine, though. Just say "I dont like Trey Lance" so it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

The initial discussion was whether Trey should be given a "fair chance" to compete for QB1. You agreed in another post that Trey didn't not look remotely as good as Brock, so I am not sure what are you trying to do to bringing in Jimmy G as a discussion point. Clearly anyone play a lot of games in this league are going to have a rough game here and there, but if that rough game is your only action last season, and you don't have other NFL performance, then fans are going to be concerned. It is not going to look good in social media. There is nothing controversy about this IMO.

This is actually a you problem. Just say you are a biased Trey fanboy and it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, you are missing the forest, for the trees here. The point was you have to ball, when called upon. That's the entire point. BP did (in a huge way). It's the entire reason he's QB1, and TL isn't, in my view. NFL is a real quick and can be cold business. I didn't bring up JG. You did.

So if a player doesn't ball when given let's say 50 or so opportunities it's fair to believe they aren't likely to be a qb1 themselves?

Originally posted by libertyforever:
The initial discussion was whether Trey should be given a "fair chance" to compete for QB1. You agreed in another post that Trey didn't not look remotely as good as Brock, so I am not sure what are you trying to do to bringing in Jimmy G as a discussion point. Clearly anyone play a lot of games in this league are going to have a rough game here and there, but if that rough game is your only action last season, and you don't have other NFL performance, then fans are going to be concerned. It is not going to look good in social media. There is nothing controversy about this IMO.

This is actually a you problem. Just say you are a biased Trey fanboy and it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

I am still baffled by the seeming point of SWH, that JG was struggling in 2017, on par with TL in 2022. Not how I saw it play out. I think most everyone would agree JG looked extremely good in 2017, BP in 2022, and TL had his struggles. Those early moments put JG and BP on QB1 paths, and TL has to scrap to get back on track. Is this not the reality? No way on earth BP is QB1, if he didn't play out of his mind, when he had the chance. It's about making the most of when you get into games.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, it was when your number is called, you have to ball. JG did, see 2017, and that is ancient history. Who know how his career goes, if he struggled in 2017, but that's another topic. If TL was playing like an All-Pro to start last season, this convo, is different in terms of QB1. Would you not agree?

It's actually hilarious that you bring up Jimmy in 2017. Just like Trey Lance, Jimmy's first start was against the Bears and he didn't score a touchdown. Then in Jimmy's 2nd start, he didn't score a touchdown until the end of 3rd quarter. So Jimmy didn't score a touchdown in his first SIX quarters as our starter.

But as you said, you can't go five quarters without scoring a touchdown, right?

SWH, you are missing the forest, for the trees here. The point was you have to ball, when called upon. That's the entire point. BP did (in a huge way). It's the entire reason he's QB1, and TL isn't, in my view. NFL is a real quick and can be cold business. I didn't bring up JG. You did.

Keep moving the goalposts dude. You are the king at that. I am not missing anything. You act like I havent repeatedly posted how thrilled I was with Brock last year and how he has earned the right to be QB1 this year if healthy. I just cant stop calling out nonsense posts like the ones I did on this topic.

And yeah, I brought up JG because the standards you are holding Trey to, you absolutely did not and continue to not hold Jimmy to.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by libertyforever:
The initial discussion was whether Trey should be given a "fair chance" to compete for QB1. You agreed in another post that Trey didn't not look remotely as good as Brock, so I am not sure what are you trying to do to bringing in Jimmy G as a discussion point. Clearly anyone play a lot of games in this league are going to have a rough game here and there, but if that rough game is your only action last season, and you don't have other NFL performance, then fans are going to be concerned. It is not going to look good in social media. There is nothing controversy about this IMO.

This is actually a you problem. Just say you are a biased Trey fanboy and it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

I am still baffled by the seeming point of SWH, that JG was struggling in 2017, on par with TL in 2022. Not how I saw it play out. I think most everyone would agree JG looked extremely good in 2017, BP in 2022, and TL had his struggles. Those early moments put JG and BP on QB1 paths, and TL has to scrap to get back on track. Is this not the reality? No way on earth BP is QB1, if he didn't play out of his mind, when he had the chance. It's about making the most of when you get into games.

Exactly. Jimmy G in 2017 looked 10 times better than Trey last season. That was the point. I don't care about the actual statistics.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
SWH, you are missing the forest, for the trees here. The point was you have to ball, when called upon. That's the entire point. BP did (in a huge way). It's the entire reason he's QB1, and TL isn't, in my view. NFL is a real quick and can be cold business. I didn't bring up JG. You did.

So if a player doesn't ball when given let's say 50 or so opportunities it's fair to believe they aren't likely to be a qb1 themselves?

Like I said, NFL can be a quick and cold business. I have no idea what is fair. I just know you gotta show out when you have a chance. Eminem wrote about this lol..

Trey Sermon is an example. Dude got hurt his first carry, and had some struggles, that was over, real fast. Naturally a huge difference in investment with TL, but clock is ticking. August is a big month, I hope he looks like a star Sunday. Would be a blessing to have a bunch of high end QBs.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by libertyforever:
The initial discussion was whether Trey should be given a "fair chance" to compete for QB1. You agreed in another post that Trey didn't not look remotely as good as Brock, so I am not sure what are you trying to do to bringing in Jimmy G as a discussion point. Clearly anyone play a lot of games in this league are going to have a rough game here and there, but if that rough game is your only action last season, and you don't have other NFL performance, then fans are going to be concerned. It is not going to look good in social media. There is nothing controversy about this IMO.

This is actually a you problem. Just say you are a biased Trey fanboy and it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

I am still baffled by the seeming point of SWH, that JG was struggling in 2017, on par with TL in 2022. Not how I saw it play out. I think most everyone would agree JG looked extremely good in 2017, BP in 2022, and TL had his struggles. Those early moments put JG and BP on QB1 paths, and TL has to scrap to get back on track. Is this not the reality? No way on earth BP is QB1, if he didn't play out of his mind, when he had the chance. It's about making the most of when you get into games.

And like I have said over and over again, your reading comprehension is either elementary school level low, or you purposely are trying to misconstrue the points being brought up to you. Lets try to spell this out so even you can understand.

-I never once said or suggested Jimmy struggled in 2017.
-I never once said or suggested that Jimmy in 2017 was on par with Trey in 2022.
-I have repeatedly said Brock killed it in 2022.
-I have repeatedly said Brock earned the right to be our QB1 in 2023, if he was healthy.

The ONLY reason I brought up Jimmy was because YOU said that "you cant go 5 quarters without a touchdown" when your number is called in a way to criticize Trey Lance....when, surprising to no one, you completely ignore that the QB you have been defending for years did THE EXACT SAME THING when his number was called.

Hope this helps. Looking forward to your spinjob reply.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Like I said, NFL can be a quick and cold business. I have no idea what is fair. I just know you gotta show out when you have a chance. Eminem wrote about this lol..

Trey Sermon is an example. Dude got hurt his first carry, and had some struggles, that was over, real fast. Naturally a huge difference in investment with TL, but clock is ticking. August is a big month, I hope he looks like a star Sunday. Would be a blessing to have a bunch of high end QBs.

So if Sam plays poorly and Lance well competition done since one took advantage and one didn't.

Originally posted by libertyforever:

This is actually a you problem. Just say you are a biased Trey fanboy and it will save us all the time to interact with your biased takes.

This is actually hilarious. I am in no way shape or form a Trey fanboy. I have repeatedly said I have no idea how good Trey Lance will be. Whats funny is that a lot of people who defend Trey Lance arent even Trey apologists or fans of him. They/We are just tired of the BS, nonsense takes that you and other people have about him. I only defend Trey against unfair criticisms, not because I actually claim to know how good he is or will be.