Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Or it says that Brock Purdy was one of the most impressive and productive rookie QBs of all time... and Trey unfortunately is the one who takes the hit for Brock's emergence.
The issue with this conclusion is it doesn't adequately address the fact that Trey is competing to be a backup with a FA.
If it was just Brock's emergence and there* was a full faith in Trey outside of it, Trey would be a set in stone QB2. Brock's injury would have been a perfect opportunity to continue to focus on Trey.
This was the argument that was made for months, including before the competition became a reality, based on evidence that a lot of other people rejected and assumed was the product of bias or hate.
Bc we signed Darnold. We didn't sign some scrub journeyman for no money. Darnold would've not signed here if he would've been told you're gonna be QB 3.
Both QBs were coming back from a major injury so we definitely needed someone who can even be a starter if both came back looking bad and not ready.
And if Darnold wins the backup spot (which I don't see happening the way Trey has played so far in camp) than that's on Trey then.
Either way, Waterbears post was the logical answer.
