There are 302 users in the forums
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
The trade was bad because we got zero impact from incredibly valuable assets for at least two years going on three, when our team was on the doorstep of winning the Super Bowl in those years. And that's just one angle of the failure. There were/are plenty others, some of which we may miraculously avoid.
It's safe to say we don't end up with Hill, Waddle, and Chubb. It's also safe to say we couldn't have gotten less from what we did so far.
+1
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
The trade was bad because we got zero impact from incredibly valuable assets for at least two years going on three, when our team was on the doorstep of winning the Super Bowl in those years. And that's just one angle of the failure. There were/are plenty others, some of which we may miraculously avoid.
It's safe to say we don't end up with Hill, Waddle, and Chubb. It's also safe to say we couldn't have gotten less from what we did so far.
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
I think it's kinda awesome how you ask such a question without any regards to the salary cap or who you're taking off the team to balance it out. Just throwing it up on a wall and seeing what's what, right?
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
lmao do you even football? what a stupid post
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
I think it's kinda awesome how you ask such a question without any regards to the salary cap or who you're taking off the team to balance it out. Just throwing it up on a wall and seeing what's what, right?
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
Waddle and Hill would have quit if they played with a QB who didnt throw downfield.
Imagine thinking it would have been Lance or these 3.
Waddle cost 2 first and a 4th
Chubb cost 1st 4th and a RB
Hill cost a 2022 first-round pick (No. 29), second-round pick (No. 50) and fourth-round pick, plus fourth- and sixth-round picks in the 2023 draft
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
Waddle and Hill would have quit if they played with a QB who didnt throw downfield.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
The trade was bad because we got zero impact from incredibly valuable assets for at least two years going on three, when our team was on the doorstep of winning the Super Bowl in those years. And that's just one angle of the failure. There were/are plenty others, some of which we may miraculously avoid.
It's safe to say we don't end up with Hill, Waddle, and Chubb. It's also safe to say we couldn't have gotten less from what we did so far.
+1
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
Waddle and Hill would have quit if they played with a QB who didnt throw downfield.
My man! Now THIS is how you respond to a CLEAR joke.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by genus49:
Who cares what Miami did with the picks? This turn into a Dolphins thread suddenly?
I think the convo on the trade up to acquire TL is not only part of the TL thread, but will be a discussion for some time to come. It's like Alex vs Aaron. Some convos are here to stay, cuz they are such big moments / moves, in franchise history.
Do you think we'd be a better or worse team if we had Waddle, Hill, and Chubb instead of Lance?
Waddle and Hill would have quit if they played with a QB who didnt throw downfield.
My man! Now THIS is how you respond to a CLEAR joke.
Reply to a joke with a joke.
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
The trade was bad because we got zero impact from incredibly valuable assets for at least two years going on three, when our team was on the doorstep of winning the Super Bowl in those years. And that's just one angle of the failure. There were/are plenty others, some of which we may miraculously avoid.
It's safe to say we don't end up with Hill, Waddle, and Chubb. It's also safe to say we couldn't have gotten less from what we did so far.
Originally posted by riverrunzthruit:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by thl408:
I doubt anyone will respond to my post because it doesn't support the thought that the Lance trade was so bad since the 49ers could have had Chubb, Hill, and Waddle, all under the cap, added to the current roster.
The trade was bad because we got zero impact from incredibly valuable assets for at least two years going on three, when our team was on the doorstep of winning the Super Bowl in those years. And that's just one angle of the failure. There were/are plenty others, some of which we may miraculously avoid.
It's safe to say we don't end up with Hill, Waddle, and Chubb. It's also safe to say we couldn't have gotten less from what we did so far.
Stop with these logical posts, they don't belong in the TL thread... only posts based on emotion and hope are permitted.
