Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
In order for me to consider a qb to have a good game, at minimum, I think they need to have at least 3 good quarters of play.
So you're formed a subject they must do this in order for me to say anything positive about Lance? Not once did I ever see you say this is what you need prior to lance playing a single football game.
so Brock had a bad game vs DC and Dallas? He sure as s**t didn't have "at least" 3 good QRs. Does Tampa bay count? Outside of a 3rd QR Brady INT that put SF just out of the RZ. We punted the ball the rest of the 2nd half. How about the Raiders game? Brock did NOT play well for "at least" 3 QRs of football.
for someone that says they want Lance to be good…you sure are passive aggressive about all of it. You can't even saying he had a damn good game vs Houston. Why? Because you have a biased narrative and can't just admit it.
You're allowed to feel how you want. Lol feel how you want but don't say I'm exaggerating when I say I don't think he's played well over all.
all of those games require context. The tampa game was over by halftime. So the game plan changed and we really were just trying to run time out. Brock played well in the raiders game, especially down the stretch etc.
I think the offense is super clunky and inefficient in his three starts. I personally don't think that's debatable but you can feel how you want.
im not passive aggressive about it. Why would I say he did? He absolutely didn't in my mind. Lmao like at all? I don't even think he has a good game. Look you love Trey and he does no wrong in your eyes, good for you, I don't feel the same about him.
if he was as special and great as you say, he would be the starter. Kyle would be pushing him to be the starter. If he was as good as Brock, it would be a different story. I think Brock is exponentially better than Lance. I think he always will be.
[ Edited by tankle104 on May 30, 2023 at 12:27 PM ]
