Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 328 users in the forums

Dee Ford, DE

Shop 49ers game tickets
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,723
Originally posted by NCommand:
True. Unfortunately, all the stats are showing he's still a top CB... and he's not paid at that right now. Not even close. The idea of extending him to lower the cap probably isn't going to work this time as he's healthy and producing at a high level. But if he's for it, great!

Yeah, but if they're trying to save on cap space there are several other players I'd approach before Sherman.

In fact, they may only need to go to one. Garoppolo with a restructure. It's an easy decision if their mind is made up on him being the franchise.
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by NCommand:
True. Unfortunately, all the stats are showing he's still a top CB... and he's not paid at that right now. Not even close. The idea of extending him to lower the cap probably isn't going to work this time as he's healthy and producing at a high level. But if he's for it, great!

Yeah, but if they're trying to save on cap space there are several other players I'd approach before Sherman.

In fact, they may only need to go to one. Garoppolo with a restructure. It's an easy decision if their mind is made up on him being the franchise.

That was literally my point. AB/NY and others were listing players we could extend to free up more immediate cap space and Sherman was brought up...just thought he might be a tougher one here.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,955
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
I read it. AB is a cap stud. However, he relies on back loading a lot of the deals into the future. I just think that's a recipie for a future cap hell. How the patriots have maintained a super bowl team and still not go though cap hell is amazing. But generally, I think how they have done it is letting go some of their star players, and constantly finding new talent, which is under priced, as compared to players comming into thier 2nd and third contracts which will be priced above the market.

Just some thoughts in the matter, I really haven't thought about it as thoroughly as AB - so it's by no means my final conclusion.

Ahh the Pats have been bottom of the league in available cap space for yrs. They're never really flush with cap space. The only reason they're not in worse shape is because they found a elite QB that's willing to take a massive discount and is pretty much playing yr to yr...if they didn't have a 40+ yr old QB that simply wouldn't be the case.

I mean you're talking about not backloading deals and talking about NE... yet that's exactly what they did with Stephon Gilmore. Dude has had a cap hit of around $9M since 2017. That s**t jumps up to $18.6M next yr. You think they move off him? I don't.

They let dudes go that are good, but aren't elite. Trey Flowers was in no shape or form worth 5yrs $90M that IMO was an easy see ya later move. Trent Brown isn't worth being the highest paid tackle in the NFL. Yes they find scheme fits, but these dudes are still making money.

backloading a deal for your FQB isn't a problem IMO, if you think he's the guy and is young enough it's a no-brainer. That position is a long-term position. Same goes for tackles.

People gotta realize there will be a new CBA soon and it will more than likely result in a higher cap, AB said in 2022 we're looking at having like $125M in cap space. Why not spend some of that future money to help a team that has a window to win now? Not every deal needs to be backloaded either.

I'm NOT all about grooming/developing talent, finally getting to see them play to their potential then letting them walk out the door.

I do understand where you're coming from, but good young talent is more important than having money in the bank. We will have to see what guys like AA/Buck/Ward are looking for....will be interesting.

Agree that certain players - you can back load their deals. I'd do that for the QB position and sooner or later Bosa and the DE/Pass rush position. If you can lock those two positions down, you can play for the playoffs every year. I'm sure there are other foundational players like the Left tackel or a top flight defensive back - that also fit that role.

Having said that - like you said, Bellicheat's let go some good talent, and has gotten compensation for them one way or another. It come down, I think, to how you want to win in this day and age of a pass happy NFL. If it was back in the old 3 yards and a cloud of dust offense days, I'm pretty sure the RB's would be back loaded. Not today.

I think Kyle can let go some *good* talent (which means the front office and the coaches have to be as good a talent evaluators as the Patriots) if they are to achieve the same level of success. I think they have the makings of that - they've had success in the 5th and later rounds, and have had good success finding undrafteds, on offense, and apparently now on defense.

That bodes well for maintaining a playoff caliber team in the age of the Salary Cap. I'll probably think more about this and also do a bit of research on this - more in the offseason (hopefully after our 6th lombardi)
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree that certain players - you can back load their deals. I'd do that for the QB position and sooner or later Bosa and the DE/Pass rush position. If you can lock those two positions down, you can play for the playoffs every year. I'm sure there are other foundational players like the Left tackel or a top flight defensive back - that also fit that role.

Having said that - like you said, Bellicheat's let go some good talent, and has gotten compensation for them one way or another. It come down, I think, to how you want to win in this day and age of a pass happy NFL. If it was back in the old 3 yards and a cloud of dust offense days, I'm pretty sure the RB's would be back loaded. Not today.

I think Kyle can let go some *good* talent (which means the front office and the coaches have to be as good a talent evaluators as the Patriots) if they are to achieve the same level of success. I think they have the makings of that - they've had success in the 5th and later rounds, and have had good success finding undrafteds, on offense, and apparently now on defense.

That bodes well for maintaining a playoff caliber team in the age of the Salary Cap. I'll probably think more about this and also do a bit of research on this - more in the offseason (hopefully after our 6th lombardi)

It's gonna come down to how much someone like AA is gonna cost. It was the same with Flowers in NE. Dude wasn't worth $90M ($54M guaranteed), so they let him walk.

If you can get AA on say a Sheldon Richardson type deal (3 yrs $37M) that's a home run signing IMO. He's still super young and could get another contract like Sheldon has been doing. I also think he wants to stay in this area.

Buck already is on the books for like $15M this upcoming season, so his contract isn't gonna change much as far as cap space goes in 2020. His deal will be big, but he's also a dude (like JG) that you can restructure down the road because he's been so reliable. There will be some LT flexibility.

Kittle will be the highest paid TE in football, the great thing is TE's don't get paid a ton compared to other positions. His deal should be backloaded similar to Kelce's.

I'd look at Djax for a comparable WR contract for Sanders. 3yrs $27M it would more a 2 yr deal that SF can get out of.

Like I said before new CBA will probably lead to a higher cap number as well
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
totally agree...I see no real harm in backloading deals for good young talent that we feel confident can play well for yrs (especially Kittle/DeFo). I was gonna bring up Sherman as well. I think he's pretty happy here in SF. redoing Jimmy's deal is a no-brainer if we feel he's the FQB.

Yep, Jimmy looked like the QB we all hoped he be on Thursday, he's the reason we won, 4 TDs, over 300 yards passing, you just tack on 2 extra years, and the maximum savings is $19M. With carryover the whole redoing deals isn't a bad thing, when there was no rollover it hurt teams badly.

The Steelers come to mind who are always over the cap, but redo Ben's deal, it helps, sure it pushes money into the future, but you worry about now, not 2-3 years from now.

This team has a serious shot at being really good for the next 5-10 years, and if they get the SB and win it, Lynch and Shanny better get extensions.

totally agree
Originally posted by okdkid:
I mean you have to look at the market. That's what you're up against. I find it very hard to believe that any team -- particularly a playoff caliber team -- would give Sherman a large multi year deal that had any significant guarantees. When cornerbacks fall off...they fall off quickly. Just like RBs.

Sherman got his money in his career. He just wants to win now. Same with Emmanuel Sanders. So I think a new Sherman deal would like very similar, if not lower, than what he currently has.

You pay for potential, not past performance.

I think playoff level team would be the most interested. Not sure how you come to this conclusion, since every year GM's make stupid signings and moves. And Sherman is not looking like he is washed at all right now. A Sherman move to safety would allow those two you mentioned to occupy the starting CB roles, and keep a superior backup on the roster.
Is this the dee ford thread?
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Originally posted by okdkid:
I mean you have to look at the market. That's what you're up against. I find it very hard to believe that any team -- particularly a playoff caliber team -- would give Sherman a large multi year deal that had any significant guarantees. When cornerbacks fall off...they fall off quickly. Just like RBs.

Sherman got his money in his career. He just wants to win now. Same with Emmanuel Sanders. So I think a new Sherman deal would like very similar, if not lower, than what he currently has.

You pay for potential, not past performance.

I think playoff level team would be the most interested. Not sure how you come to this conclusion, since every year GM's make stupid signings and moves. And Sherman is not looking like he is washed at all right now. A Sherman move to safety would allow those two you mentioned to occupy the starting CB roles, and keep a superior backup on the roster.

Yeah Sherman will eventually take a Charles Woodson role and become a pro bowl safety. We do not want Sherman gone, he needs to retire a 49ers and eventually become the defensive backs coach or DC for the team
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Is this the dee ford thread?

Should be....... Seems to have turned into the Salary Cap for 2020 thread LOL
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,955
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree that certain players - you can back load their deals. I'd do that for the QB position and sooner or later Bosa and the DE/Pass rush position. If you can lock those two positions down, you can play for the playoffs every year. I'm sure there are other foundational players like the Left tackel or a top flight defensive back - that also fit that role.

Having said that - like you said, Bellicheat's let go some good talent, and has gotten compensation for them one way or another. It come down, I think, to how you want to win in this day and age of a pass happy NFL. If it was back in the old 3 yards and a cloud of dust offense days, I'm pretty sure the RB's would be back loaded. Not today.

I think Kyle can let go some *good* talent (which means the front office and the coaches have to be as good a talent evaluators as the Patriots) if they are to achieve the same level of success. I think they have the makings of that - they've had success in the 5th and later rounds, and have had good success finding undrafteds, on offense, and apparently now on defense.

That bodes well for maintaining a playoff caliber team in the age of the Salary Cap. I'll probably think more about this and also do a bit of research on this - more in the offseason (hopefully after our 6th lombardi)

It's gonna come down to how much someone like AA is gonna cost. It was the same with Flowers in NE. Dude wasn't worth $90M ($54M guaranteed), so they let him walk.

If you can get AA on say a Sheldon Richardson type deal (3 yrs $37M) that's a home run signing IMO. He's still super young and could get another contract like Sheldon has been doing. I also think he wants to stay in this area.

Buck already is on the books for like $15M this upcoming season, so his contract isn't gonna change much as far as cap space goes in 2020. His deal will be big, but he's also a dude (like JG) that you can restructure down the road because he's been so reliable. There will be some LT flexibility.

Kittle will be the highest paid TE in football, the great thing is TE's don't get paid a ton compared to other positions. His deal should be backloaded similar to Kelce's.

I'd look at Djax for a comparable WR contract for Sanders. 3yrs $27M it would more a 2 yr deal that SF can get out of.

Like I said before new CBA will probably lead to a higher cap number as well

Dee Ford's injury I think precludes him from getting back loaded. Now that we got the Dee Ford thread issue out of the way...

From a cap standpoint, I think you backload the QB (obviously) and his go to reciever - the TE (Kittle obviously). The TE from an offensive standpoint affects the run and the pass, so having a dominant TE really makes an OK offense good, and a good offense - borderline great. ShanaLynch has proven that they can get OL and RB's from the FootballMart discount store, and draft/trade for good to all pro WR's. So, I think, from an offensive cap point of view, if ShanaLYnch leans on Kyle's particular offensive genius talent evaluation - I think offensively they can replicate what New England has done with Brady - from a cap stanpoint. Even if Jimmy doesn't discount his services and doesn't go with any backloading.

It's a passing league, and if you look at New England, you can see their main defensive scheme is almost a linebacker-centric one, which was (I think) Bellicheats forte' back in the New York Giant's days. I.e. they seem to operate a 2-5-4 defense (with almost 5 linebackers in their nickel) as their predominant alignment. Whereas the 49er defense seems to go with no DT's (but 4 DE's) 3 big safety/linebacker hybrids and four DB's for their predominant nickel alignment. I'm exaggerating a little bit, but what I'm getting to is that both teams focus on stopping the pass vs the run. (which on a side note - Kyle's run game is almost going in the opposite of the NFL trend and going back to the run).

From a capanomics standpoint, I can see them just continue to invest high draft capital in a lot of DE's, continue to get young fast free agent linenbackers (and mid to low round LB draftees and free agents). They seem to be able to also draft good DB's late and were able to get good free agent DB's like Richard from the free agency market.

In other words - I think where the cap is going to spent on is going to be defense. I can see the DE's taking up a good chunk of the cap and draft capital. QB would be second, and the rest of the team following those two areas. Just my two cents as I look into this a bit more.

So in a sense, I agree with you, I think they have a shot at retaining AA. (I'm looking at AA and Buckner as more DE's than DT"s - from a pass defense standpoint because they are undersized DT's if they were to be in a traditional 3-4 defense, Bosa and Ford could be tweener hybrid DE/Linebackers too, again when compared to players in an old traditional 3-4)
[ Edited by Giedi on Nov 9, 2019 at 9:42 AM ]
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,955
Originally posted by Ark49er:
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Originally posted by okdkid:
I mean you have to look at the market. That's what you're up against. I find it very hard to believe that any team -- particularly a playoff caliber team -- would give Sherman a large multi year deal that had any significant guarantees. When cornerbacks fall off...they fall off quickly. Just like RBs.

Sherman got his money in his career. He just wants to win now. Same with Emmanuel Sanders. So I think a new Sherman deal would like very similar, if not lower, than what he currently has.

You pay for potential, not past performance.

I think playoff level team would be the most interested. Not sure how you come to this conclusion, since every year GM's make stupid signings and moves. And Sherman is not looking like he is washed at all right now. A Sherman move to safety would allow those two you mentioned to occupy the starting CB roles, and keep a superior backup on the roster.

Yeah Sherman will eventually take a Charles Woodson role and become a pro bowl safety. We do not want Sherman gone, he needs to retire a 49ers and eventually become the defensive backs coach or DC for the team


Yes, I agree. I think he'd be a great safety. Between strong and free safety, I'd put him at strong safety (a la Ronnie lott) because of his speed deficiency. I think he can replicate John Lynch's role as one of the great strong safety's ever to play the game in that Buccaneer Tampa two defense.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by Ark49er:
Originally posted by Bluesbro:
Originally posted by okdkid:
I mean you have to look at the market. That's what you're up against. I find it very hard to believe that any team -- particularly a playoff caliber team -- would give Sherman a large multi year deal that had any significant guarantees. When cornerbacks fall off...they fall off quickly. Just like RBs.

Sherman got his money in his career. He just wants to win now. Same with Emmanuel Sanders. So I think a new Sherman deal would like very similar, if not lower, than what he currently has.

You pay for potential, not past performance.

I think playoff level team would be the most interested. Not sure how you come to this conclusion, since every year GM's make stupid signings and moves. And Sherman is not looking like he is washed at all right now. A Sherman move to safety would allow those two you mentioned to occupy the starting CB roles, and keep a superior backup on the roster.

Yeah Sherman will eventually take a Charles Woodson role and become a pro bowl safety. We do not want Sherman gone, he needs to retire a 49ers and eventually become the defensive backs coach or DC for the team


Yes, I agree. I think he'd be a great safety. Between strong and free safety, I'd put him at strong safety (a la Ronnie lott) because of his speed deficiency. I think he can replicate John Lynch's role as one of the great strong safety's ever to play the game in that Buccaneer Tampa two defense.

Ronnie did both, but I'd definitely put him at SS as well. Not next year because he is playing at a high level, but maybe 2022 or 2023.
On another note, I think Dee Ford is only going to look better as offenses try to stop Nick Bosa. When I saw Dee Ford catch Kyler Murray all by himself behind the line of scrimmage (the horse collar call), I knew no running QB had a chance against this line. Maybe Lamar Jackson because he is bigger, but that's about it.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,955
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Ronnie did both, but I'd definitely put him at SS as well. Not next year because he is playing at a high level, but maybe 2022 or 2023.


Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
On another note, I think Dee Ford is only going to look better as offenses try to stop Nick Bosa. When I saw Dee Ford catch Kyler Murray all by himself behind the line of scrimmage (the horse collar call), I knew no running QB had a chance against this line. Maybe Lamar Jackson because he is bigger, but that's about it.


Agree on both. This defensive line is ferocious. I think Kyler is a bit faster than Midget, but both are pretty fast and elusive. In the long run, I don't think you slow either of these guys down, I think you have to have an offense that can match them score for score, and a defense that can stall their offense occasionally. The 49ers were able to stall Kyler's offense on a couple of 3 and outs, and that was the difference in the game.

I see both Kyler and Midget as Steve Young replicas, and I don't think anybody back then could stop Steve Young's offense either. They had to knock him out and end his career to do that.
hey, wondering if dee will be playing the rest of the season. This hamstring thing smells like a cover up for his knee issues getting out of control.

Anyone have an injury scoop? losing this guy would hurt. Or having him for 15 snaps a game.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone