Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Teams need to get away from overpaying WRs. Teams always have 2 WRs and sometimes 3. TEs are popular targets. RBs get their share. If a QB throws 40 passes which is a lot then that means it can be spread between 4-5 guys. Given the amount that they actually contribute in the typical game they shouldn't be paid more than a good RB who touches the ball more and is often called on to block big D linemen.
I think Kittle had it right. I forget what interview recently, but he said you nay be better off paying two top tight ends than one receiver. I actually agree. Imagine Kittle + LaPorta, who you could get for slightly more than what you are spending on a single top 5-10 receiver.
Granted, LaPorta isn't available, but then sentiment is,based on the market, we may want to start spending elsewhere.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by Boldjames:
Trade
A trade would be preferable if anyone offered a 3rd or higher. Otherwise a cut is better since they'll save more money.
They don't save money regardless. It's just if they want to eat it all now or spread it out. Sometimes getting that DM over with in one shot is better than dealing with it for a couple yrs.
imo if there's a trade worth looking at go ahead and do it…if there's nothing than cut him now and post it as a June 1st cut. Go let him find work elsewhere. No need to hold him hostage waiting for a future day 3 pick in June.
I'll always root for Deebo
If they can make it work somehow, I say eat the dead money now. As for the trade itself, I think there are some things in our favor.
1. Poor receiver draft.
2. Deebo still has something to offer- especially if he isn't being counted on to be the number 1 offensive target.
3. Bump this year's numbers to around 100 targets and he gets nearly 1000 yards at his current rate.
4. Only one year left on his deal. A team could trade for Deebo and have potential to recoup the pick if he leaves in free agency.
If I were certain teams, I'd easily offer a 5th. But for the receiver poor teams, a 4th would be worth it and there are a lot of receiver poor teams.