Kareem Hunt

After Aldon Smith, Ray McDonald, Rueben Foster do you really think the Niner braintrust is going to sign Hunt? No way, no how. Besides that, with McKinnon, Breida, Wilson & Mostert Coach really doesn't need Hunt to execute his offense. Is Kareem an A+ talent, you bet he is. But again, there's no way they'll sign him after a series of problem players. Save the cap space to sign an interior DL (my choice, Malcolm Brown, Pats), LB Anthony Barr, CB Jason Verrett or Ronald Darby & FS Adrian Phillips. Those are much bigger needs than adding Hunt to an already talented & deep RB corps.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Actually KC has won a SB. With their defense issues I dont think they would beat LA or NO with or without Hunt on a neutral field anyway.

Their d still has ford, Houston who are sick ends and Chris Jones a top 5-10 interior easily. Not to mention berry most likely back even at less than 100% it's still an upgrade. So with hunt it's a no brainer imo.

hardly

their biggest issue is their run defense, they are one of the worst in the NFL. and their pass defense isn't that good either. come playoff time, any team with a good run game and good defense should beat KC.

Wrong! Not even close. KC can outscore teams just passing. It's a passing league. Look at the rams their d is horrific most of the year and so is their run d (Seattle dropped what 230 on them). So not any team with a good run game and d should beat them.

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
Actually KC has won a SB. With their defense issues I dont think they would beat LA or NO with or without Hunt on a neutral field anyway.

Their d still has ford, Houston who are sick ends and Chris Jones a top 5-10 interior easily. Not to mention berry most likely back even at less than 100% it's still an upgrade. So with hunt it's a no brainer imo.

hardly

their biggest issue is their run defense, they are one of the worst in the NFL. and their pass defense isn't that good either. come playoff time, any team with a good run game and good defense should beat KC.

Wrong! Not even close. KC can outscore teams just passing. It's a passing league. Look at the rams their d is horrific most of the year and so is their run d (Seattle dropped what 230 on them). So not any team with a good run game and d should beat them.

The Chiefs are 31st out of 32 teams in the league in defense. They are a bad defense and the stats prove it out. Hell the pathetic Raiders just scored 33 points on them and they have given up 87 points the last 2 weeks.

Saying that it was a "no brainer" that the Chiefs would have won the SB with Hunt is laughable. They would have had a chance just like the Saints, Rams, Pats, Steelers, and Chargers. But I would have bet a LOT of money if I could have had the field against them I know that.

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
After Aldon Smith, Ray McDonald, Rueben Foster do you really think the Niner braintrust is going to sign Hunt? No way, no how. Besides that, with McKinnon, Breida, Wilson & Mostert Coach really doesn't need Hunt to execute his offense. Is Kareem an A+ talent, you bet he is. But again, there's no way they'll sign him after a series of problem players. Save the cap space to sign an interior DL (my choice, Malcolm Brown, Pats), LB Anthony Barr, CB Jason Verrett or Ronald Darby & FS Adrian Phillips. Those are much bigger needs than adding Hunt to an already talented & deep RB corps.

Hunt is on the commissioners exempt list, so he cannot play.

Why would anyone sign a guy who cannot play?

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
After Aldon Smith, Ray McDonald, Rueben Foster do you really think the Niner braintrust is going to sign Hunt? No way, no how. Besides that, with McKinnon, Breida, Wilson & Mostert Coach really doesn't need Hunt to execute his offense. Is Kareem an A+ talent, you bet he is. But again, there's no way they'll sign him after a series of problem players. Save the cap space to sign an interior DL (my choice, Malcolm Brown, Pats), LB Anthony Barr, CB Jason Verrett or Ronald Darby & FS Adrian Phillips. Those are much bigger needs than adding Hunt to an already talented & deep RB corps.

Hunt is on the commissioners exempt list, so he cannot play.

Why would anyone sign a guy who cannot play?

Ask the Redskins

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
After Aldon Smith, Ray McDonald, Rueben Foster do you really think the Niner braintrust is going to sign Hunt? No way, no how. Besides that, with McKinnon, Breida, Wilson & Mostert Coach really doesn't need Hunt to execute his offense. Is Kareem an A+ talent, you bet he is. But again, there's no way they'll sign him after a series of problem players. Save the cap space to sign an interior DL (my choice, Malcolm Brown, Pats), LB Anthony Barr, CB Jason Verrett or Ronald Darby & FS Adrian Phillips. Those are much bigger needs than adding Hunt to an already talented & deep RB corps.

Hunt is on the commissioners exempt list, so he cannot play.

Why would anyone sign a guy who cannot play?

Ask the Redskins

Poor decision.

Yup another POS like mixon and Foster ...They shouldn't be allowed in tha NFL

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

The Chiefs are 31st out of 32 teams in the league in defense. They are a bad defense and the stats prove it out. Hell the pathetic Raiders just scored 33 points on them and they have given up 87 points the last 2 weeks.

Saying that it was a "no brainer" that the Chiefs would have won the SB with Hunt is laughable. They would have had a chance just like the Saints, Rams, Pats, Steelers, and Chargers. But I would have bet a LOT of money if I could have had the field against them I know that.

I guess you have never seen the chiefs play at home because their home field advantage is ridiculous. They had a free ticket to the Super Bowl in my opinion and if they played the Rams or saints it would've been a pretty good game but Eric Berry is coming back and the chiefs have two great pass rushers. So to me this was their year unlike the rams saints or pats

Originally posted by elguapo:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:
The Chiefs are 31st out of 32 teams in the league in defense. They are a bad defense and the stats prove it out. Hell the pathetic Raiders just scored 33 points on them and they have given up 87 points the last 2 weeks.

Saying that it was a "no brainer" that the Chiefs would have won the SB with Hunt is laughable. They would have had a chance just like the Saints, Rams, Pats, Steelers, and Chargers. But I would have bet a LOT of money if I could have had the field against them I know that.

I guess you have never seen the chiefs play at home because their home field advantage is ridiculous. They had a free ticket to the Super Bowl in my opinion and if they played the Rams or saints it would've been a pretty good game but Eric Berry is coming back and the chiefs have two great pass rushers. So to me this was their year unlike the rams saints or pats

lol at free ticket. You are seriously a crack up. As for their 2 great pass rushers it didnt do them that much good when they gave up over 50 points to LA and 33 to the Jokeland Raiders. Or 43 to New England. Now, its certainly possible for them to still make the SB without Hunt. But they have a QB that has never played a playoff game, a leaky defense, and will have a lot of pressure on them.

Originally posted by Young2Rice:

Originally posted by Ninerjohn:

Originally posted by glorydayz:

Originally posted by CorvaNinerFan:
After Aldon Smith, Ray McDonald, Rueben Foster do you really think the Niner braintrust is going to sign Hunt? No way, no how. Besides that, with McKinnon, Breida, Wilson & Mostert Coach really doesn't need Hunt to execute his offense. Is Kareem an A+ talent, you bet he is. But again, there's no way they'll sign him after a series of problem players. Save the cap space to sign an interior DL (my choice, Malcolm Brown, Pats), LB Anthony Barr, CB Jason Verrett or Ronald Darby & FS Adrian Phillips. Those are much bigger needs than adding Hunt to an already talented & deep RB corps.

Hunt is on the commissioners exempt list, so he cannot play.

Why would anyone sign a guy who cannot play?

Ask the Redskins

Poor decision.

My understanding is that there is no video evidence against Foster, so I can see why the Redskins would take a chance on him. I mean, look what happened the last time Foster was accused of this. Hunt got caught doing the Ray Rice...

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25805106/multiple-teams-interested-former-kansas-city-chiefs-rb-kareem-hunt
Any chance we could get in on this?

Originally posted by Livendiea9er:
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25805106/multiple-teams-interested-former-kansas-city-chiefs-rb-kareem-hunt
Any chance we could get in on this?

Re: Post number 46 of this thread …

Originally posted by Livendiea9er:

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/25805106/multiple-teams-interested-former-kansas-city-chiefs-rb-kareem-hunt
Any chance we could get in on this?

Given the Foster situation coupled with previous comments about no tolerance for putting hands on a woman , I can't see any way they touch him

Lol this whole ordeal is gonna end up benefitting Hunt. Out of a rookie deal making 600k a year. Now gonna make a few mil at least.

They should have signed him. Smh.