Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Every option, including keeping Jimmy comes with some risk or down side. There is no perfect scenario here.
Agreed.
There are 359 users in the forums
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Every option, including keeping Jimmy comes with some risk or down side. There is no perfect scenario here.
Originally posted by 442Olds:
There's no price tag on be able to win a Super Bowl.
Originally posted by Howlett49:He's getting a new contract from someone this off-season. If he doesn't get traded or no new contract I bet he will hold out of camp and possibly when games start. He's stubborn and I put my money on a new contract with GB
Originally posted by ComeOnDeberg:
Well, there it is...
https://www.nfl.com/news/packers-ceo-no-way-aaron-rodgers-leaves-we-re-not-idiots
Originally posted by 442Olds:There's no price tag on be able to win a Super Bowl.
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Trade for Love
Originally posted by TonyStarks:Originally posted by 442Olds:There's no price tag on be able to win a Super Bowl.
Yeah there is. If Rodgers hogs all the cap money, how are you able to have a complete team?
Merhomes might not be in the super bowl if there was no Kelce, Tyreek Hill, steller defense, hof coach ...etc
Originally posted by Joecool:Originally posted by JMC52:What would Rodgers cost? 2 firsts? I'd rather go for Watson. I either hope we get lucky in draft with QB or just stick with Jimmy and not get ride of our future picks
Does it really matter? Rodgers is THE BEST thrower of the football and I am very confident he wins a SB if he is a 49ers. I would give as much as 3 1st rounders for him if it means he will be playing for at least 3 years for us.
Rodgers and Kyle would make a great duo because both respect high level football knowledge.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:Originally posted by TonyStarks:Originally posted by 442Olds:There's no price tag on be able to win a Super Bowl.
Yeah there is. If Rodgers hogs all the cap money, how are you able to have a complete team?
Merhomes might not be in the super bowl if there was no Kelce, Tyreek Hill, steller defense, hof coach ...etc
I think he's saying mortgaging the future for a Super Bowl win is fair.
Originally posted by TonyStarks:Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:Originally posted by TonyStarks:Originally posted by 442Olds:There's no price tag on be able to win a Super Bowl.
Yeah there is. If Rodgers hogs all the cap money, how are you able to have a complete team?
Merhomes might not be in the super bowl if there was no Kelce, Tyreek Hill, steller defense, hof coach ...etc
I think he's saying mortgaging the future for a Super Bowl win is fair.
Like the packers have the last 10 years?