49ers vs. Titans Tickets Available! →

There are 682 users in the forums

QB CJ Beathard - signs with Jacksonville

Shop 49ers game tickets
I'm probably way late to this party but this is shocking news to me.

Originally posted by NCommand:
I'm probably way late to this party but this is shocking news to me.

Really
Kyle : "I need to make him look good for 1 game so we can get something back for my piss poor decision "
Originally posted by wysiwyg:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I'm probably way late to this party but this is shocking news to me.

Really

LMAO. You picked up on my sarcasm well.
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Comparing QB's on won-loss records when the sample size is small is worthless. This team was bad for the last 2 years and it wasn't all the fault of the QB's. Receivers were terrible for the most part and the defense was beyond bad. I agree with most of you that Mullens looks the best of the 2 backups but when comparing records you have to look at who the games were against, where they were played and if the opposing team was playing all their guys or resting some like they do at the end of the season. Even then, it's a small sample size. I repeat what I've said several times; none of our QB's including Jimmy has proven anything to me. I need to see at least a full season and maybe 2 before I'll be convinced of a guy's ability. Too many one year wonders in the NFL.

It's not about the record, and you don't have to do any of that stuff. Assuming adequate size, strength, and toughness, there is only one thing that separates NFL quarterbacks, and that is a quick mind. Reading defenses, going through progressions quickly, and decision making makes all the difference. If you are still slow with an adequate understanding of the offense, this is the one thing that is never going to get a lot better.

We haven't seen Mullens' ceiling. We have CJ's.
Originally posted by smithgdwg:
Originally posted by Rsrkshn:
Waste of a roster spot.
He's played enough to show conclusively that he is NEVER going to be a starting caliber QB in this league. And he's not a particularly good back-up either. Not demonstrably better than any number of QB's who've been waived.
Why would any team give up a draft pick for someone whose spot can be filled at no cost in draft capital?
Any draft choice for CJ would have been a good deal. Niners should have jumped on whatever Denver was offering. Instead of playing hardball and ending up with nothing.
It's this kind of stuff that

Maybe they don't trust JG durability.


True. But they would have to have a very low expectation there.
It certainly could be that they are unsure of JG's knee to the point that they might have to sit him for a few games, with the expectation of bringing him on later in the season. Then it makes sense as a kind of insurance policy.
The other aspect that I had not considered is that CJ might be a positive influence in the locker room. And the Niners don't want to disrupt the positive vibes by releasing a popular player. A lot of players seemed to have his back when he was the starter. It just might have tipped the odds in his favor if it was a borderline decision. We are not privy to all of their reasoning.
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Remember this 53 only has 8 OL. 8. Remember this as the season progresses as you see CJ with the clipboard.

It would be rare for a 9th OL on the roster to be active on gameday (in fact, often only 7 are active). If someone gets injured they can always elevate one of the PS guys or sign a free agent like one of the guys they worked out the last couple days.
[ Edited by captveg on Sep 3, 2019 at 3:03 PM ]
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by cciowa:
he did nothing to earn a spot on this roster when we have glaring holes in other places... this was on kyles ego. he went up and got his boy and come hell or high water. cj stays.

Remember this 53 only has 8 OL. 8. Remember this as the season progresses as you see CJ with the clipboard.

Issue is that our FO is clueless. Nobody is giving up a 3rd or 4th or even a 5th for backup QB with little starter potential. Teams want back up vet QBs, or young QBs that they draft themselves so they know the playbook well.

And to get the Hoyers of the NFL, you dont need to trade a draft pick. There are plenty of FA vet QBs every year.
[ Edited by TheGore49er on Sep 3, 2019 at 3:14 PM ]
I bet there are a few QB hungry teams out there sitting on a decent swing tackle...
Originally posted by GoldBrick:
I bet there are a few QB hungry teams out there sitting on a decent swing tackle...

Ohhhh. Intriguing
I
Originally posted by GoldBrick:
I bet there are a few QB hungry teams out there sitting on a decent swing tackle...

Or a couple teams who are trying to tank the season
Jets could use Beathard about now. I'd take a 4th for him
Originally posted by 5thSFG:
Jets could use Beathard about now. I'd take a 4th for him

Ive been sayin this since last week!
  • titan
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 8,292
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Originally posted by 5thSFG:
Jets could use Beathard about now. I'd take a 4th for him

Ive been sayin this since last week!

Trade Jags Beathard for Ramsey.
Destined to be a Steeler...

Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone