Originally posted by RTFirefly:
Originally posted by Jason:
It's reallt hard for me to see the POV of those who say weed isn't addicting. If I told you I'd give you 2.5 million dollars to not use an illegal substance for a few years... it may not be physically addictive but psychologically it's hitting hard.
For those who are blaming the state, the cop, the law, the league, or even Goodell- you are an enabler. A man has a choice. A man's choice carries with it consequences (that this man knew ahead of time). Anyone who says differently is an enabler and a sicophant.
So Reuben is addicted to pot and he should've drunk alcohol or taken opioids to prove he's not addicted to anything. I get it.
People have been taking substances to relax and enjoy since the beginning of time. Just because you as an individual don't believe it should happen isn't going to stop it.
Furthermore, many people believe weed is safer than alcohol, the law be damned (for one thing no one's ever died from weed od or withdrawal, people do from alcohol and opioids every single day). So to safely ingest a substance to relax and enjoy, they choose weed. It is the smarter choice.
It has nothing to do with being an enabler or a sycophant.
It has everything to do with being an enabler. The thing you and many are missing is it doesn't matter what you think. I feel I need to say it again. It doesn't matter what you personally think is fair, should be law, or how a cop should behavior. Your opinion is only good for one vote. Should statements are cognitive distortions. Should doesn't matter. What IS matters.
Who cares about alcohol? It's like you hoped I'd bring it up so you could get to a substance abuse talking point. Problem is, I didn't.
The simple truth is that he broke an existing law. He will pay the laws consequences as well as those of his workplace. I suspect he has many people around him telling him it's not his fault and what "should be." Those are called enablers and sicophants.