Seattle Seahawks thread

Did not see the game.

Did Wicket have brilliant game planning by his offensive coordinator to hook it up or did Belichick bring in a Jim O'Neil game plan to the table?

As usual the defense did almost all the work, turnovers were key of course and.........
as usual Baldwin (or graham) bailed rw out by dominating his matchups. Wide open most of the game for rw and.......
Of course like I stated before the game since rw is going up against an average d, he will do well. Still don't know his excuse for the saints and not throwing a td pass for 3 games in a row Bc all of you that say he needs his mobility obviously did not see the 6 games last year where he was a pocket passer against horrible defenses and or secondaries.

But, but, but . . .
Only because they were ALL up against less-than-stellar defenses 😉





https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-points-per-game

Anyhoo - looks like Eagles D will be a true challenge . . .

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2016/week-10-dvoa-ratings

What's Wilson going to do when he loses his mobility as he gets older?

Originally posted by Joecool:
What's Wilson going to do when he loses his mobility as he gets older?

What makes you think he will lose his mobility? The only way he loses his mobility sooner rather than later is if he suffers a debiltating injury of some sort. The QB he is often compared to, Fran Tarkenton, played 18 years in the league and his rushing numbers didn't drop off until year 15.

Originally posted by Joecool:
What's Wilson going to do when he loses his mobility as he gets older?

Throw from the pocket maybe? I'm not sure why anyone would worry about hypotheticals 5+ years from now.

Originally posted by Joecool:
What's Wilson going to do when he loses his mobility as he gets older?

Originally posted by TonyStarks:

Originally posted by D0PEMAN:
wow

Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 6m6 minutes ago
Former Seahawks RB Christine Michael is now subject to waivers. Thirty-one teams have shot to claim him Wednesday.

we need to pick his ass up just to piss off the hawks

Originally posted by jeepzilla:

Originally posted by beastalamode:
So no guapo yet eh? It's going to be pretty hard for him to deny the Rustlers sick stat line from this game:


25/37, 348 yards, 3 td and 0 pics, rating 124.6


And NOBODY goes into New England and beats Brady, but Russ just did.

Kap did it also.... in Nov I believe when they had never lost a home game till then...
That was a few years ago though so I'm sure some of you wouldn't
Know this because quite a few of you guys just started watching football

Daaayum, truth right there in bold!!!

#BandWagonHatersAKAcawkSuckers

Originally posted by LisaTwelve:

But, but, but . . .
Only because they were ALL up against less-than-stellar defenses 😉





https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/opponent-points-per-game

Anyhoo - looks like Eagles D will be a true challenge . . .

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/dvoa-ratings/2016/week-10-dvoa-ratings

your finally getting it. Oh wait, gb and giving up over 100 points over the last 3 games is a good defense hahaha. ISNT the reason mariota had a joke of a time completing passes and a 75 yard run from Murray.

Oh wait, the steelers league low sacks and a bad defense ISNT the reason Dak and company had a good game??? Also, Dallas d is bad and without their top players in the secondary it's no wonder why the steelers carved them up

And new England's d is horrible. That had nothing to do with rws good performance even though he couldn't do anything the last 3 games and much of the season. Thank goodness for graham and Baldwin and the best d in the NFL.

But but but, thanks for proving my point. Or maybe should we all be bragging about how kap did pretty great against Arizona and New Orleans, 2 teams rw looks like hot garbage.

Actually Patriot defense is currently 6th in the league in pts allowed. WidgetHawks have scored the most points against them so far this season and not suprisingly they are now 9th in the league in total defense but are 2nd in pts allowed. So what makes a good defense? Is it points allowed, yards allowed, or some combo of both? Would you rather have a defense that allows 3 pts and 500 yds a game or 4 pts and 100 yds a game? Obviously you go with the former, so is that Patriot defense really that bad considering they only give up half a point more per game than the RussellHawks?

Originally posted by elguapo:
Is your finally getting it. Oh wait, gb and giving up over 100 points over the last 3 games is a good defense hahaha. ISNT the reason mariota had a joke of a time completing passes and a 75 yard run from Murray.

Oh wait, the steelers league low sacks and a bad defense ISNT the reason Dak and company had a good game??? Also, Dallas d is bad and without their top players in the secondary it's no wonder why the steelers carved them up

And new England's d is horrible. That had nothing to do with rws good performance even though he couldn't do anything the last 3 games and much of the season. Thank goodness for graham and Baldwin and the best d in the NFL.

But but but, thanks for proving my point. Or maybe should we all be bragging about how kap did pretty great against Arizona and New Orleans, 2 teams rw looks like hot garbage.

in the famous words of Morgan49 . . . .

Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
Actually Patriot defense is currently 6th in the league in pts allowed. WidgetHawks have scored the most points against them so far this season and not suprisingly they are now 9th in the league in total defense but are 2nd in pts allowed. So what makes a good defense? Is it points allowed, yards allowed, or some combo of both? Would you rather have a defense that allows 3 pts and 500 yds a game or 4 pts and 100 yds a game? Obviously you go with the former, so is that Patriot defense really that bad considering they only give up half a point more per game than the RussellHawks?

Yep, that was sorta my point.
For the most part, those other defenses were ranked lower than NE and yet, not a lot of "conditional chatter" re: the success of those QBs

//

Originally posted by elguapo:
Is your finally getting it. Oh wait, gb and giving up over 100 points over the last 3 games is a good defense hahaha. ISNT the reason mariota had a joke of a time completing passes and a 75 yard run from Murray.

Oh wait, the steelers league low sacks and a bad defense ISNT the reason Dak and company had a good game??? Also, Dallas d is bad and without their top players in the secondary it's no wonder why the steelers carved them up

And new England's d is horrible. That had nothing to do with rws good performance even though he couldn't do anything the last 3 games and much of the season. Thank goodness for graham and Baldwin and the best d in the NFL.

But but but, thanks for proving my point. Or maybe should we all be bragging about how kap did pretty great against Arizona and New Orleans, 2 teams rw looks like hot garbage.

The bold could be considered trolling on .NET, but very applicable in the context of throwing random stats out there to construct arguments.

But most fans, teams and the media know the pats d is not good regardless of ranking. Just the same as the Seahawks are still the best defense regardless of ranking. You guys are definitely too Stat oriented. You neglect to account for injuries to account for rankings as well. You don't think Seattle wouldn't be ranked higher if kam or Bennett were in all year? Other teams have injuries but not to difference makers like that.

Points allowed is a better indicator of defense but common sense is the best indicator. Seattles defense is still the best and Denver is close behind. That is all. You can't argue that new England's defense is even top 10. He'll maybe not even top 15. Who have they played? They traded chandler jones and now Jamie Collins. Even the broadcasters were ripping on new England's joke of a pass rush.

Smh at seriously making an argument for rw against an average New England d and not criticizing him for his horrible play the last 3 games and quite frankly most of the year. Keep in mind he has graham and Baldwin. Or just keep ignoring that fact

Originally posted by LisaTwelve:

in the famous words of Morgan49 . . . .

Smh at that one.

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:

//
The bold could be considered trolling on .NET, but very applicable in the context of throwing random stats out there to construct arguments.

I know, it's too easy with these subjective biased arguments