Vikings trade for Bradford

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by GMniner805:
Well it's already starting, Bradford beats GB on Monday night. 49er fans have such a low football IQ in general.

Wait, what?

it's only one game. He has EVERYTHING going for him in Minnesota... Defense, Running game, Speedy Big receivers.

I still don't trust Bradford, and I still don't agree with the trade.




















.

Looking like a good trade. Not sure what the hype was with Bridgewater anyway I think he was average at best.

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:

We shouldve traded for bradford

Don't you know how much hate Baalke would get if he traded next year's first and a potential second for Bradford? Niner Talk would have shut down

Originally posted by Afrikan:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by GMniner805:

Well it's already starting, Bradford beats GB on Monday night. 49er fans have such a low football IQ in general.

Wait, what?

it's only one game. He has EVERYTHING going for him in Minnesota... Defense, Running game, Speedy Big receivers.

I still don't trust Bradford, and I still don't agree with the trade.




















.

I miss those uniforms

Originally posted by saniner:

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:

We shouldve traded for bradford

Don't you know how much hate Baalke would get if he traded next year's first and a potential second for Bradford? Niner Talk would have shut down

True. But i think it could have been a smart move. Bradford is talented. We have a good defense. A good run game. We wouldve just needed to address the wrs

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:

We shouldve traded for bradford

For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

hell no. dude will be on IR within a few weeks...............again.

Originally posted by evil:
For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

His nock on Chips Offense during the offseason tell me a trade probably wouldn't have happened.

Originally posted by ChazBoner:
hell no. dude will be on IR within a few weeks...............again.

this. It was a miracle he actually got through last season without ending up on the IR.

Honestly i thought the eagles FO were complete idiots and now they are looking like one of the smartest FOs in the league after snagging a franchise QB like Wentz and regaining a high draft pick by trading Bradford. Their future looks pretty bright.

The Packers defense blows when Rodgers is having a horrible season so far. Blaine Gabbert is the 3rd worse qb in the NFL. Number one and two are RG3 and Aaron Rodgers. Without their offense applying any pressure the Packers are an easy win. We will how he does this week against Carolina.

Originally posted by WINiner:

The Packers defense blows when Rodgers is having a horrible season so far. Blaine Gabbert is the 3rd worse qb in the NFL. Number one and two are RG3 and Aaron Rodgers. Without their offense applying any pressure the Packers are an easy win. We will how he does this week against Carolina.

WHAT?


I hope you're kidding. I hope you don't really think Super Bowl MVP, 2 x NFL MVP, 2 x All Pro, and 5 x Pro Bowler Aaron Rodgers is the 2nd worst QB in the league.

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:
We shouldve traded for bradford

For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

1st and 4th, a sure NO...

BUT, what makes you think KELLY didn't want him... I would personally think thank that Kelly would wanna sign him and compete with Sunshine while allowing Kaep to walk before MARCH...

IT'S most likely Baalke who had the BRIGHT IDEA of trying to CON John Elway on giving up a 3rd rounder and absorbing the whole 11 million for Kaep while fully believing that both Wentz and Goff will be there at the 7th spot for the taking...

and since that didn't fall to his plans, he followed it up by drafting who I would call "FAN FAVORITE" in Buckner so that those silly followers of his would continue to support him and believe..

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:

We shouldve traded for bradford

For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

1st and 4th, a sure NO...

BUT, what makes you think KELLY didn't want him... I would personally think thank that Kelly would wanna sign him and compete with Sunshine while allowing Kaep to walk before MARCH...

IT'S most likely Baalke who had the BRIGHT IDEA of trying to CON John Elway on giving up a 3rd rounder and absorbing the whole 11 million for Kaep while fully believing that both Wentz and Goff will be there at the 7th spot for the taking...

and since that didn't fall to his plans, he followed it up by drafting who I would call "FAN FAVORITE" in Buckner so that those silly followers of his would continue to support him and believe..

They couldn't just cut kap before march because he was injured. That clause can only be enacted if he's healthy.

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:
We shouldve traded for bradford

For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

1st and 4th, a sure NO...

BUT, what makes you think KELLY didn't want him... I would personally think thank that Kelly would wanna sign him and compete with Sunshine while allowing Kaep to walk before MARCH...

IT'S most likely Baalke who had the BRIGHT IDEA of trying to CON John Elway on giving up a 3rd rounder and absorbing the whole 11 million for Kaep while fully believing that both Wentz and Goff will be there at the 7th spot for the taking...

and since that didn't fall to his plans, he followed it up by drafting who I would call "FAN FAVORITE" in Buckner so that those silly followers of his would continue to support him and believe..

They couldn't just cut kap before march because he was injured. That clause can only be enacted if he's healthy.

then that would even make Baalke the GENIUS (NOTTTTT) that he is... letting Kaep act like he's injure when he really wasn't...you see, basically, all his game planning ended up biting his ownself in his butt..

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by StOnEy333:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 4everFaithful:

We shouldve traded for bradford

For a 1st and conditional 4th ? No.

We could have signed him in March but didn't. That tells me Kelly wasn't all that interested in acquiring him.

1st and 4th, a sure NO...

BUT, what makes you think KELLY didn't want him... I would personally think thank that Kelly would wanna sign him and compete with Sunshine while allowing Kaep to walk before MARCH...

IT'S most likely Baalke who had the BRIGHT IDEA of trying to CON John Elway on giving up a 3rd rounder and absorbing the whole 11 million for Kaep while fully believing that both Wentz and Goff will be there at the 7th spot for the taking...

and since that didn't fall to his plans, he followed it up by drafting who I would call "FAN FAVORITE" in Buckner so that those silly followers of his would continue to support him and believe..

They couldn't just cut kap before march because he was injured. That clause can only be enacted if he's healthy.

then that would even make Baalke the GENIUS (NOTTTTT) that he is... letting Kaep act like he's injure when he really wasn't...you see, basically, all his game planning ended up biting his ownself in his butt..

Wait, what? He had 3 legitimate surgeries in the past 10 months. You think he wasn't injured? lol