Originally posted by Empire49:
You are asking the wrong question. The real question is how many good WRs did we pass on knowing that WR was a top need? Just because we didn't draft a bunch of failures at the position doesn't mean that we didn't fail at properly identifying and selecting good prospects. We let way too many impact receivers slide right by us while we drafted players at positions that should have been a lower priority. Believe it or not, continuously allowing good WRs to slip past you means you can't seem to draft WRs.
I think the larger problem is that this team struggles to use receivers from the get-go. I can't think of any receiver that they've had or had that wouldn't be more successful elsewhere. Guys like Patton and Ellington are the types of receivers that the Packers and Steelers regularly draft, develop and then turn into starters 2 or 3 years down the road. Here they can't even get on the field.
I don't think there's any receiver that this team could draft and use them to their full ability at this juncture. So it becomes irrelevant who they did or did not draft, they wouldn't look anything like they look on other teams.
This might change with a new coaching staff but for a team that built its success on the WCO, seeing them have one of the consistently s**ttiest passing offenses in the NFL for over a decade now is quite disheartening. Seeing teams with less talent having more success is even more so.