Trading Deadline | Page 2 | 49ers Webzone Forum

Oct 28, 2013 at 9:41 AM

PRIMETIME21
Veteran
Posts: 18,606

Originally posted by Raul98:
I would love if they could pull off Fitzgerald imagine a receiving group of Fitzgerald Crabtree Boldin but it will never happen Arizona would never let us have him.

with his fat contract? yea no 0 percent thats happening, Gordon makes sense since he is cheap and under contract for awhile, or maybe nicks as a rental, but not these big money making guys.

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.

Oct 28, 2013 at 10:05 AM

#17

theninermaniac
Veteran
Posts: 3,430

I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

Oct 28, 2013 at 10:10 AM

#18

POG_
Veteran
Posts: 98,414

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

His two touchdown passes to Davis against Arizona went 40 and 45 yards through the air. The 61-yarder wasn't a floater because Kaep threw it like Superman.

Oct 28, 2013 at 10:24 AM

#19

Raul98
Veteran
Posts: 1,304

Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
with his fat contract? yea no 0 percent thats happening, Gordon makes sense since he is cheap and under contract for awhile, or maybe nicks as a rental, but not these big money making guys.

Arizona would never let us have him anyway so your right 0 percent chance. I would gladly take Gordon if they would take a 2nd or 3rd pick for him i would not give them a 1st.

Oct 28, 2013 at 10:36 AM

#20

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

why. we score 30 plus points without that junk

Oct 28, 2013 at 10:41 AM

#21

m_brockalexander
Veteran
Posts: 13,366

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

why. we score 30 plus points without that junk

Imagine how much the Niners would score if they had a deep threat? Scary.

Oct 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM

#22

cciowa
Veteran
Posts: 60,541

Originally posted by m_brockalexander:

Originally posted by cciowa:

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

why. we score 30 plus points without that junk

Imagine how much the Niners would score if they had a deep threat? Scary.

maybe but i am fine with 30 plus point the way we are playing esp when our defense holds people down and our special teams gives other teams poor field position most of the time

Oct 28, 2013 at 1:47 PM

#23

matt49er
Veteran
Posts: 7,457

Originally posted by sfout:

Originally posted by matt49er:
Lattimore can practice for 3 weeks then just be placed on IR for the rest of the year. Teams have 3 weeks to either activate the player, release him or put him on IR, the latter has been the plan the entire time for Latt.

I laugh that you respond to only that out of everything that I wrote. I know he can practice for 3 weeks and go on IR but I could see us eating a roster spot for him and holding him out until the postseason.

BUT only if the medical staff knows he is ready to play. That being said I don't Lattimore is activated at all.

You laugh? I agree with everything else you said, what else did you want? Based on your comments it didn't seem like you knew by saying "7 if we take Lattimore's words seriously that he'll be practicing (but not playing) in the next few weeks." I was simply pointing out that he can practice & not play & not take up a roster spot since we have 3 weeks to put him on season ending IR. By the bolded statement it seemed like u thought that if/when he began practicing we would have to utilize a spot for him. Not sure how that wasn't a reasonable conclusion based on your statements.

Oct 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM

#24

hofer36
Veteran
Posts: 8,257

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

in the bear game he aired one out to kyle williams

Oct 28, 2013 at 4:43 PM

#25

hofer36
Veteran
Posts: 8,257

does the falcons loss to arizona increase chances that Atlanta might send tony gonzalez back to Kansas city?

Oct 28, 2013 at 4:46 PM

#26

POG_
Veteran
Posts: 98,414

Originally posted by hofer36:

Originally posted by theninermaniac:
I just want to see kaep air one out to somebody. I still dont think ive ever seen him truly bomb one yet.

in the bear game he aired one out to kyle williams

Oh, I thought we were talking about this season. Moss and Walker vs Pats?

Oct 28, 2013 at 4:46 PM

#27

PRIMETIME21
Veteran
Posts: 18,606

Originally posted by hofer36:
does the falcons loss to arizona increase chances that Atlanta might send tony gonzalez back to Kansas city?

atlanta is done, they would get owned by SF or seattle right now.

Oct 28, 2013 at 6:58 PM

#28

POG_
Veteran
Posts: 98,414

Wow. That pass rush is dominating.

Oct 28, 2013 at 9:04 PM

#29

hofer36
Veteran
Posts: 8,257

balke should have sent amthony dixon to rams for nuthin--boobie would have gotten into the end zone on 4th and 1

Oct 28, 2013 at 9:09 PM

#30

gold49digger
Veteran
Posts: 17,675

Originally posted by sfout:
I laugh that you respond to only that out of everything that I wrote. I know he can practice for 3 weeks and go on IR but I could see us eating a roster spot for him and holding him out until the postseason.

BUT only if the medical staff knows he is ready to play. That being said I don't Lattimore is activated at all.

That's awfully risky to activate a rookie that hasn't played in over a year in a position that we don't need immediate help in during the playoffs. BUT it could pay off if he can get up to speed.