There are 317 users in the forums
Is Mark Sanchez really that bad?
Apr 27, 2013 at 12:42 PM
- cwilson830
- Staff
- Posts: 5,499
He sucks.
Apr 27, 2013 at 12:50 PM
- SanDiego49er
- Veteran
- Posts: 48,011
Originally posted by ChazBoner:
lol
Apr 27, 2013 at 5:07 PM
- Godsleftsock
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,291
Originally posted by blizzuntz:A QB who played efficient Bc his weaknesses were masked with a strong run game and great defense.
Am I talking about Smith or Sanchez?
Sanchez was nowhere near as accurate. I could be making that up though.
Apr 27, 2013 at 5:11 PM
- pdizo916
- Member
- Posts: 38,241
he sucks because he has no talent and the jets are horrible in giving him weapons. He had absolutely no one to work with last year.
Apr 27, 2013 at 7:58 PM
- vaden
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,026
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Originally posted by vaden:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
A QB who played efficient Bc his weaknesses were masked with a strong run game and great defense.
Am I talking about Smith or Sanchez?
Sanchez was never even close to efficient. His career high in completion pct. is 56.7% despite playing in a conservative offense.
in the playoffs he is over 60% and over a 93 QB rating
Small sample size, less than 10% of his total starts.
Apr 28, 2013 at 8:36 AM
- JTsBiggestFan
- Veteran
- Posts: 7,710
I think Sanchez and Smith are similar with careers in reverse. Smith a bit more efficient, Sanchez a bit more of a playmaker.
Would like to see him go to a good situation and thrive.
Would like to see him go to a good situation and thrive.
Apr 29, 2013 at 5:35 PM
- InHarbsWeTrust
- Member
- Posts: 1,310
Originally posted by vaden:Small sample size, less than 10% of his total starts.
Usually the playoffs are a small sample size of a player's career. BTW. He has been good in the playoffs. 6 games is enough of a sample size.
Apr 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM
- kronik
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,316
So many posters here pounded the table "He has the 'IT factor!! Who Cares if he only played a little in college" LMFAO
[ Edited by kronik on Apr 29, 2013 at 5:48 PM ]
Apr 29, 2013 at 5:49 PM
- kronik
- Veteran
- Posts: 4,316
Originally posted by Garcia:
dude has never had a great running game.
he has never had good receivers
he has a horrendous coach
he is Alex Smith 2.0
He wishes he could be that good one day
Apr 29, 2013 at 6:40 PM
- ChipDouglas510
- RIP ChipDouglas510
- Posts: 19,157
I don't trust QB's from USC...Nuff said
Apr 29, 2013 at 7:12 PM
- 49erfeeeever808
- Veteran
- Posts: 31,326
Originally posted by InHarbsWeTrust:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
in the playoffs he is over 60% and over a 93 QB rating
Yes. He's been good in the playoffs. He's 4-2 and has played well in both AFC Championship games. Dog him all you want, but the guy plays well in the playoffs and has been clutch.
last two seasons he couldn't even get into the playoffs.
Apr 29, 2013 at 7:32 PM
- blizzuntz
- Veteran
- Posts: 48,169
Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Originally posted by InHarbsWeTrust:
Originally posted by blizzuntz:
in the playoffs he is over 60% and over a 93 QB rating
Yes. He's been good in the playoffs. He's 4-2 and has played well in both AFC Championship games. Dog him all you want, but the guy plays well in the playoffs and has been clutch.
last two seasons he couldn't even get into the playoffs.
bc the offensive line and defense declined
think of Alex Smith when our defense and offensive line was non dominant = Sanchez like
Apr 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM
- InHarbsWeTrust
- Member
- Posts: 1,310
Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:last two seasons he couldn't even get into the playoffs.
You know...this is a team sport, right?
Apr 29, 2013 at 7:37 PM
- InHarbsWeTrust
- Member
- Posts: 1,310
Originally posted by kronik:He wishes he could be that good one day
I'd like to see Sanchez with Harbaugh and 4 extra years under his belt before I agree with this.
Apr 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM
- gold49digger
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,357
I don't think he is as bad as people say he is. But he is no where near a top 10 qb. Give him a solid offense with some weapons and he becomes serviceable.