Originally posted by Zealot:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Ahmad be big time released.
But how released is he!?
He be big time released.
Yeah, he's pretty released, ay.
He be released.
There are 265 users in the forums
Originally posted by Zealot:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by VaBeachNiner:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Ahmad be big time released.
But how released is he!?
He be big time released.
Yeah, he's pretty released, ay.
Originally posted by jcs:
Anyone else notice other teams in the league cutting veterans?
Just a thought but with two more preseason games to play and seeing starters go down with knee injuries today couldn't this end up backfiring?
Originally posted by JamesGatz83:Backfiring how? Is the lack of Ahmad Brooks going to prevent us from making a Super Bowl run this year? Worst case scenario, we end up giving someone younger a look while we rebuild.
Originally posted by jcs:
Anyone else notice other teams in the league cutting veterans?
Just a thought but with two more preseason games to play and seeing starters go down with knee injuries today couldn't this end up backfiring?
Originally posted by PacTiger:
NFL.com I'm s reporting they were trying to trade Brooks for two weeks. This means they decided to part ways with Brooks before any preseason game. It's his contract and nothing else.
Here
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:KS the liar or the report is the liar. odds are on the report
Originally posted by PacTiger:
NFL.com I'm s reporting they were trying to trade Brooks for two weeks. This means they decided to part ways with Brooks before any preseason game. It's his contract and nothing else.
Here
KS is such a liar lol. Unless he had no idea about this, which I don't buy.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:KS the liar or the report is the liar. odds are on the report
Originally posted by PacTiger:
NFL.com I'm s reporting they were trying to trade Brooks for two weeks. This means they decided to part ways with Brooks before any preseason game. It's his contract and nothing else.
Here
KS is such a liar lol. Unless he had no idea about this, which I don't buy.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheHYDE49er:KS the liar or the report is the liar. odds are on the report
Originally posted by PacTiger:
NFL.com I'm s reporting they were trying to trade Brooks for two weeks. This means they decided to part ways with Brooks before any preseason game. It's his contract and nothing else.
Here
KS is such a liar lol. Unless he had no idea about this, which I don't buy.
Originally posted by jcs:Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:KS the liar or the report is the liar. odds are on the reportOriginally posted by TheHYDE49er:Originally posted by PacTiger:NFL.com I'm s reporting they were trying to trade Brooks for two weeks. This means they decided to part ways with Brooks before any preseason game. It's his contract and nothing else.
Here
KS is such a liar lol. Unless he had no idea about this, which I don't buy.
Ks is the liar, seriously how can a hc claim he doesn't know how much more Brooks is making than Eli. He's either in charge of the whole show or he isn't.
Free agent linebacker Ahmad Brooks visiting the Packers #49ers [@ProFootballTalk] https://t.co/FT8HDnyhqc
— 49ers Webzone (@49erswebzone) August 27, 2017
Originally posted by PacTiger:
It looks like they tried holding onto Brooks to try to trade him. Nobody wants that contract. But they decided, at best, after OTAs that Brooks wasn't in the plans anymore.