Originally posted by Otter:
Ghost, question for you.
Based on your comments, you seem very high on Newton. You and another poster were adamantly defending Newton when I made a comment that I didn't want him on the 49ers. In the webzone draft thread when drafting for this team, you took Gabbert over Newton.
Do you rate them Gabbert 1 and Newton 2? Just curious, as critics of Newton are dealing with certain veiled accusations (not from you, that I recall anyway).
In the right system, with the right coaching staff and talent around him, I believe Cam can grow into one of the better QBs in the league. He has that much talent. But if those things aren't in place, and if he's rushed on to the field without the proper grooming, he'll develop bad habits and rely to much on his athleticism as opposed to growing into a real QB.
I would rate Gabbert higher than Newton simply because there are less questions around his game and his personality (he's the cleaner overall prospect). Overall, I see the QBs ranked this way:
1.) Gabbert - (proto-type QB in just about every aspect)
2.) Ponder - (more pro-ready, and nice fit for a WCO)
3.) Newton - (off-the-charts skill-set)
4.) Mallet - (Perfect Raider QB in just about every way)
5.) Locker - (Will need time, but can develop into a very good WCO)