There are 436 users in the forums
Originally posted by smithgdwg:So are they now desert Raiders instead of pirates?
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by Team49ers:
Las Vegas got even more interesting, imagine sin city hosting a SB. Sucks for raider fans in the bay though, just when the raiders started turning the corner they up and leave.
They're in Oakland for at least the next two years, maybe three. Maybe, they win a Super Bowl in the next few years.
What if they win a SB in Levi's( if they share the stadium)?![]()
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:Did OAK really have a "shovel ready, fully financed" stadium proposal? This is according to Libby Shaaf.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:I agree. This bad is for the NFL. And a bad sign for fans across America. Not a Raiders fan, but I really hope the city of Oakland do what Cleveland did and at least keep the team name. I hope not one Oakland fan follows this team to Vegas. And for the next two seasons that the team has to play in Oakland the organization needs to be protested heavily, booed loudly and often, the owners - including Roger Goodell - burned in effigy, Raiders games boycotted to XFL attendance, their games tickets scalped and counterfeited, and the organization deserves for the fans to openly cheer for the other teams on "home" games.Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:Bad day for nfl. Oakland is a legacy franchise. There has to be an oakland. Too many memorable performers.
This is terrible.
Oakland isn't a legacy franchise. The raiders are. Vegas will now be the 4th city they've played in.
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:Originally posted by mayo49:Originally posted by Team49ers:Las Vegas got even more interesting, imagine sin city hosting a SB. Sucks for raider fans in the bay though, just when the raiders started turning the corner they up and leave.
They're in Oakland for at least the next two years, maybe three. Maybe, they win a Super Bowl in the next few years.
What if they win a SB in Levi's( if they share the stadium)?![]()
. I do not wat the first Super Bowl team let alone playoff game to play/be played in our facility by a team other than the Niners.. please let them stay in Oakland until the leave.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by StOnEy333:Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:I agree. This bad is for the NFL. And a bad sign for fans across America. Not a Raiders fan, but I really hope the city of Oakland do what Cleveland did and at least keep the team name. I hope not one Oakland fan follows this team to Vegas. And for the next two seasons that the team has to play in Oakland the organization needs to be protested heavily, booed loudly and often, the owners - including Roger Goodell - burned in effigy, Raiders games boycotted to XFL attendance, their games tickets scalped and counterfeited, and the organization deserves for the fans to openly cheer for the other teams on "home" games.Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:Bad day for nfl. Oakland is a legacy franchise. There has to be an oakland. Too many memorable performers.
This is terrible.
Oakland isn't a legacy franchise. The raiders are. Vegas will now be the 4th city they've played in.
Won't Vegas be the third city for the Raiders?
Is Candlestick in San Francisco or South San Francisco? The 49ers could be on city #3 as well.
Originally posted by StOnEy333:The raiders started in SF. Then oak, then LA, then oak, and soon Vegas. 4th city.
Kezar and candlestick are both in SF. Santa Clara is the 2nd city for the Niners.
Originally posted by GorefullBore:
I can't wait until they are out of town and the Niners completely own the bay.