OFFICIAL: The Shaun Hill Starship

Originally posted by dust-7:

Originally posted by B650:
You'll probably see Nate Davis before you see Shaun Hill again

Nate could have talent. Hill is good at seeing the field, mostly. And he had the magic when it came to turnovers, the other team couldn't handle his wobbly passes. Smith, it's the perfect pass for the other team. INT!

I think Hill would be back in there if we see the same ole Alex against Indy. That will be on what he sees by way of INTs, and whether the O-line can give him three seconds to throw.

Singletary isn't going to play musical chairs at QB. Alex is the guy now, and I don't see him being replaced, even if he has 2 or 3 horrible games in a row. Besides, what's it going take for him to get benched? Let's say he throws for 170 yards or so. Does that warrant him being benched? That's roughly what Hill averaged through 5.5 games this season, so he can't do much worse. It's going to take a A LOT for Smith to get benched. I'm talking like 3 or 4 turnovers a game for then next 3 or 4 games. I just don't see that happening.

I think Smith is going to make the most out of this opportunity, if not next week, then the week after when we're finally back home against the Titans. Then we play the Bears who almost gave up 50 points against the Bengals. Following the Bears, we play the Packers who also have a suspect defense. Finally, we have the Jaguars at home again, a game we should win. I don't see Smith being benched.

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

Originally posted by jreff22:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

thats what they get for being Hillusionists

Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

Originally posted by chico49erfan:

Originally posted by dust-7:

Originally posted by B650:
You'll probably see Nate Davis before you see Shaun Hill again

Nate could have talent. Hill is good at seeing the field, mostly. And he had the magic when it came to turnovers, the other team couldn't handle his wobbly passes. Smith, it's the perfect pass for the other team. INT!

I think Hill would be back in there if we see the same ole Alex against Indy. That will be on what he sees by way of INTs, and whether the O-line can give him three seconds to throw.

I don't think so. Alex Smith will play this entire game, even if he plays sub-par. And personally, his demeanor in the 2nd half vs. the Texans and the way he's handled himself all week have been showing maturity and a humbleness that tells me him getting injured, having a coach bulls**t with him, and being humiliated as a #1 overall bust have caused him to just not give a f**k what others think and go out there and do what he does best -- play football. Go alex! Go niners!

Alex has been through a lot. I really think (hope, anyway) that he is about ready to start startling some people. If that's the case, the Niners will be in good shape for years to come.

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

Is it flying itself???


It's a commercial airliner and don't tell me to "lighten up" MAN!

fn tasteless joke

Originally posted by showtime49:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

looks like the movie plane to me. or what ever that movie about the plane was.

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

Is it flying itself???


It's a commercial airliner and don't tell me to "lighten up" MAN!

fn tasteless joke

oh my mistake, you are right, they would never use a commercial jet in Hollywood.

what was I thinking

Give it up man, it was a real plane crash that killed 137 people.
http://www.cogs.sussex.ac.uk/courses/dm/lec05.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSA_Flight_182

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by danimal:

Originally posted by Super5:

Originally posted by Mex49:

Originally posted by jreff22:

absolutely perfect

There were people on that plane and you find the pic funny?



WOW

how do you know people are on that plane? Lighten up, man

Is it flying itself???


It's a commercial airliner and don't tell me to "lighten up" MAN!

fn tasteless joke

oh my mistake, you are right, they would never use a commercial jet in Hollywood.

what was I thinking

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

Originally posted by danimal:

Quote:
Um, because it was a Boeing that went down in 1978. Over 100 dead.

Show this image to 100 random people and how many do you think are going to identify that?

Thats kind of important when someone is going to make an assumption about someone else.

I certainly am not going to ASSUME the poster knew that.

So if you're not sure something is real or not, then you should assume it's false and laugh at it?

Or would it be more prudent to just be sensitive to the possibility that it's the real deal?

This would be more appropriate.