Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by krizay:
No you are not born a QB. In order to be a top 10 pick you should have become one by that point. Not learning to become one. That's how I personally look at it. That's said, if you are only using one pick it's not that big of a risk. It's when you give up multiple starters or potential starters that costs you.
I think that idea has changed somewhat as the league has changed. These kids in college aren't running a ton of pro-style offenses, they're not diagnosing coverages pre/post like QBs at the NFL level. They're not getting full field reads. s**t a lot of them have meh mechanics.
IMO like most positions, it's projecting a player on what they could be. We got smart coaches implementing what these kids did well in college, adding that to their system and slowly expanding the playbook as they grow.
Having elite skill sets that aren't coachable with great intangibles is valued a ton at the QB position across the league right now for a reason.
Let's just look at our recent draft situation. There were 4 QBs that fall into this category.
1. Was "generational" talent and bust proof. He already learned how to play QB. He looks the part.
2. Was another mobile strong arm guy still trying to learn to play QB. has since been benched and his team is willing to depend assests and MILLIONS for his replacement.
3. Another mobile strong arm guy still trying to learn to play QB is getting lucky this off season in that he gets one more chance to hold on to his job.
4. Another mobile strong arm guy looks good in the running department but has a ways to go on being a true QB.
So you are obviously correct their skill sets aren't coachable. You may be overstating the intangibles that you believe these QBs actually have. While underestimating the importance of the skill sets that they lack.
We'll never agree on this philosophy