Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 510 users in the forums

What do you believe to be the saddest/most negatively impactful moment of the 49ers draft.

Browse 49ers books and videos
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
I will admit, that I have been coming off much more negatively since Saturday. I generally try hard to be a critical but level headed poster on here. But since the draft, that's been a little tougher for me, and I probably have come off as more reactionary than normal.

But let me try to explain a little of where I'm coming from with this.

I really think that if the 9ers don't put up a legit good season this year, someone is going to get fired. Would that person be Lynch? Maybe... maybe not. It's hard to know. But if players from last draft regress like we saw last year, and then this crop doesn't show promise, he's going to be in a tough spot.

I like Lynch and I want him to stay. He's brought back the decency that used to be a hallmark of the 49ers and felt totally gone under the Baalke regime. And I think a GM switch could hurt the team's progress. So I'm rooting for him to keep his job. But to do that, I really think he needs to show marked improvement in his drafting. And why I'm so frustrated is that I don't think he has. Not because I wish he picked my guys over his guys (although I do, obviously), but because I think he has some flawed tendencies in the draft.

Let me try to explain...

My biggest concern is that he often uses the middle of the draft on players who will never been every down starters. That's a luxury move you can get away with when you're really good, but it is really limiting when you're trying to rebuild. To me, you need to be using those middle round picks on players who can compete for spots at every down positions. But instead, he often uses middle round picks for niche role players and then later round picks for every down players. And the result is often niche players not working out or not doing enough if they do, and the later round guys simply not being good enough (which is not abnormal for later round players). Just think that should be reversed. Use your mid round picks to fill out the meat and potatoes positions and your late round picks on the niche guys.

For example... CJ Beathard was a 3rd round pick and (being honest here) was always intended as a back up QB. Street was a 4th round pick and not going to play at all last year. Hurd, a 3rd rounder, is a situational gadget player. And a punter is a punter... He doesn't always do this, and I'm ok with him being wrong on middle round players when he's drafting guys who COULD be every down starters. Was Witherspoon the best CB he could have taken? Probably not, but he took the guy he liked and that player has had an impact on the team. I'm fine with that. Warner obviously turned out great, but even if he had just been kinda good I still would have supported the pick. I don't know how much I like Moore, but again, I'm not mad at that pick.

When I look at this draft I see two legitimately potential every down starters, Bosa and Deebo. Even if Hurd and the punter end up being great, they still won't do as much for the team as hitting on a DB or OL would have. And the late round guys are fine, but I don't think you can expect much of 6th round picks.

I just think the value of mid round picks and the likelihood of finding a starter there is waaaaay more than late round picks. I feel like they are spending their money on candy bars when they need to be putting food on the table. We're still an underdog team trying to show the league we're better than people think. In my view, we're drafting like a team that's already made it, or a team that feels fine being mediocre another year. And I don't support that.

Phoenix, you may be right. We may not need a secondary to make the playoffs this year. Or maybe the same guys will be way better this year.. Either way I appreciate you being patient with my current negativity. And for reading this long rant, if you made it this far

I read it and I think its a fair take, I remember pounding the table for guys like Carl Lawson and Alvin Kanara, but then also for guys like Ogbonnia Okonrowko, Jeff Holland and Alex Bars this year.

The middle rounds can unearth good starters, but if you look at his tendencies he always takes a bit of a flier and they are clearly guys his coaches want.

I'm completely fine with that, there will always be a high level of misses in the mid rounds, and Kittle outweighs nearly all of them.

I'd much rather that than a guy who forces someone on a coach because they are "good value".

A draft takes 3 years to judge properly and I think we've hit more than we've missed. When you take our excellent trades and some really good FA pick ups into account I think our FO are doing pretty well.
Originally posted by midrdan:
If they thought he was better than Colbert at the single high position they would have taken him. I'm done with the negative posters here ... support the team. The reality is there's one Earl Thomas every decade. If S is out biggest weakness after this season we will address it. Let's see the young guys we've drafted actually play for a couple of years before all the sky is falling nonsense.

spot on, we've got a few with potential it's time to see if they can make the next step rather than starting again with someone new.
Free safety is my biggest regret in this draft/free agency because I have little to no faith in Jimmie Ward. Hope I'm wrong and he performs well.
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
I'm all for playing the long game in life, but you gotta know when to have a sense of urgency.

This year three for these guys (shanny and lynch). They need to put wins on the board this year. Our pass defense was so bad last year that even with a healthy Jimmy G we were not going to go far.

If their logic is that we can fix the secondary next year, they might have a hard time doing that after someone gets fired. And if the secondary isn't better, the team won't win enough games to avoid having to axe someone.


You keep insisting that someone will get fired which sounds more like sour grapes over the team not drafting the players that you wanted. Overall this team got better. The roster is far better than the one they took over in 2017. As long as they don't bomb the season completely, nobody is getting fired.


KC had an absolutely garbage secondary and they were basically a few playcalls from going to the SB. With a healthy Garoppolo and an upgraded receiving corps, this team is going to put up some major points.


Adding Bosa and Ford will do more for the pass defense than any safety or CB could have. If they get a healthy Verrett then the pass defense will be miles beyond what we saw last year.

Really if some dumbass didn't jump offsides they probably win the game. I'm glad we don't have any player that dumb on our team
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Trading down in the 4th to the Bengals then the very next pick being Chauncey Gardner Johnson

^^^^^^This all day.
Originally posted by m_brockalexander:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Trading down in the 4th to the Bengals then the very next pick being Chauncey Gardner Johnson

^^^^^^This all day.

Really felt like Alvin Kamara all over again.... Both were guys I was super high on and couldn't believe had just landed in the 9ers lap. And then the disappointment happened. And both times it was the Saints who got the player.

Way too early to know if CGJ will end up stinging like Kamara, but the draft day feeling was the same.
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:

I really think that if the 9ers don't put up a legit good season this year, someone is going to get fired. Would that person be Lynch? Maybe... maybe not. It's hard to know. But if players from last draft regress like we saw last year, and then this crop doesn't show promise, he's going to be in a tough spot.

I like Lynch and I want him to stay. He's brought back the decency that used to be a hallmark of the 49ers and felt totally gone under the Baalke regime. And I think a GM switch could hurt the team's progress. So I'm rooting for him to keep his job. But to do that, I really think he needs to show marked improvement in his drafting. And why I'm so frustrated is that I don't think he has. Not because I wish he picked my guys over his guys (although I do, obviously), but because I think he has some flawed tendencies in the draft.

I do think you are right about Lynch's standing. I think the next 1-2 years will have a significant impact on his tenure as GM.

I am disappointed with the draft strategy, but all I can do now is hope that all the players work out.
Overall, I think he is betting heavily on the coaches to maximize the 90 man roster. I think it's a very risky move, but hey - he's the one getting paid the big bucks. Maybe he knows that it's not the best strategy, but at the same time realizes it's absolutely critical for the team to find success (playoff berth) first.

On the positive side, I'm rooting for:
- health (x100)
- solid coaching for DL and DBs
- consistent run game
- not so many sacks on Garoppolo
- good and quick short/intermediate pass game with Garoppolo
[ Edited by zonkers on Apr 30, 2019 at 12:13 PM ]
trade up for grant delpit next year problem solved.
Originally posted by zonkers:
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:

I really think that if the 9ers don't put up a legit good season this year, someone is going to get fired. Would that person be Lynch? Maybe... maybe not. It's hard to know. But if players from last draft regress like we saw last year, and then this crop doesn't show promise, he's going to be in a tough spot.

I like Lynch and I want him to stay. He's brought back the decency that used to be a hallmark of the 49ers and felt totally gone under the Baalke regime. And I think a GM switch could hurt the team's progress. So I'm rooting for him to keep his job. But to do that, I really think he needs to show marked improvement in his drafting. And why I'm so frustrated is that I don't think he has. Not because I wish he picked my guys over his guys (although I do, obviously), but because I think he has some flawed tendencies in the draft.

I do think you are right about Lynch's standing. I think the next 1-2 years will have a significant impact on his tenure as GM.

I am disappointed with the draft strategy, but all I can do now is hope that all the players work out.
Overall, I think he is betting heavily on the coaches to maximize the 90 man roster. I think it's a very risky move, but hey - he's the one getting paid the big bucks. Maybe he knows that it's not the best strategy, but at the same time realizes it's absolutely critical for the team to find success (playoff berth) first.

On the positive side, I'm rooting for:
- health (x100)
- solid coaching for DL and DBs
- consistent run game
- not so many sacks on Garoppolo
- good and quick short/intermediate pass game with Garoppolo

I was listening to the latest Locked On 49ers podcast this morning and he brought up how there have been multiple times in their short reign with the 9ers that Lynch and Shanahan have "felt good" about obviously lacking position groups. He mentions their edge rushers, WRs and DBs specifically. They will site how much they like a player, like Marsh or Ward, and claim that an upgrade wasn't needed. But then the season comes along and those players simply don't cut it.

Clearly over optimism with their own current roster is something Shanahan and Lynch suffer from. They both seem like smart guys and so maybe they can learn from this. But I do worry that if we have to wait for the process of letting position groups take an entire extra season to prove the limitations everyone else can see, this rebuild could take too long to work.

Anyway, I'll be joining you in hoping for those things. Ultimately my true hope is that the 9ers come together in a way that is greater than the sum of their parts.
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
I was listening to the latest Locked On 49ers podcast this morning and he brought up how there have been multiple times in their short reign with the 9ers that Lynch and Shanahan have "felt good" about obviously lacking position groups. He mentions their edge rushers, WRs and DBs specifically. They will site how much they like a player, like Marsh or Ward, and claim that an upgrade wasn't needed. But then the season comes along and those players simply don't cut it.

Clearly over optimism with their own current roster is something Shanahan and Lynch suffer from. They both seem like smart guys and so maybe they can learn from this. But I do worry that if we have to wait for the process of letting position groups take an entire extra season to prove the limitations everyone else can see, this rebuild could take too long to work.

Anyway, I'll be joining you in hoping for those things. Ultimately my true hope is that the 9ers come together in a way that is greater than the sum of their parts.

That is the biggest flaw with the regime. The good thing is that when they finally acknowledge that a position needs help they address it.

But it was frustrating watching the safety prospects go by our picks when we need at least 1 to compete with ward and colbert.
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
I was listening to the latest Locked On 49ers podcast this morning and he brought up how there have been multiple times in their short reign with the 9ers that Lynch and Shanahan have "felt good" about obviously lacking position groups. He mentions their edge rushers, WRs and DBs specifically. They will site how much they like a player, like Marsh or Ward, and claim that an upgrade wasn't needed. But then the season comes along and those players simply don't cut it.

Clearly over optimism with their own current roster is something Shanahan and Lynch suffer from. They both seem like smart guys and so maybe they can learn from this. But I do worry that if we have to wait for the process of letting position groups take an entire extra season to prove the limitations everyone else can see, this rebuild could take too long to work.

Anyway, I'll be joining you in hoping for those things. Ultimately my true hope is that the 9ers come together in a way that is greater than the sum of their parts.

That is the biggest flaw with the regime. The good thing is that when they finally acknowledge that a position needs help they address it.

But it was frustrating watching the safety prospects go by our picks when we need at least 1 to compete with ward and colbert.

You do bring up a good point, which is that once they have decided they want to upgrade a group they have shown a willingness to throw a lot of weight behind fixing it. But that's them waiting to be reactive instead of getting ahead of the problem and being proactive. I think when you need to be more proactive in today's NFL.

Also, I feel like their reactive attempts to address positions have been a little clumsy and inconsistent. Marsh didn't prove everyone wrong so they replaced him with Dee Ford and Bosa. That's one hell of an upgrade! WRs didn't show up last year and so we spent 2 high picks on WRs and brought in Jordan Matthews. This one is pretty mixed for me. Obviously they are trying to address WR, but they spent high picks on one WR who looks more like a #2 to me, and another who looks like gadget player. And as FA signings go, Jordan Matthews was basically a an insurance policy against missing out on guys in the draft. And then there's the DB bonanza they went on in the draft last year. To me they went quantity over quality there. And as a result we still have massive needs at DB.

I'm looking forward to watching this pass rush. And I'm hoping like hell this WR influx turns out better than last year's DB influx.
  • dj43
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 38,276
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Originally posted by TheFunkyChicken:
I was listening to the latest Locked On 49ers podcast this morning and he brought up how there have been multiple times in their short reign with the 9ers that Lynch and Shanahan have "felt good" about obviously lacking position groups. He mentions their edge rushers, WRs and DBs specifically. They will site how much they like a player, like Marsh or Ward, and claim that an upgrade wasn't needed. But then the season comes along and those players simply don't cut it.

Clearly over optimism with their own current roster is something Shanahan and Lynch suffer from. They both seem like smart guys and so maybe they can learn from this. But I do worry that if we have to wait for the process of letting position groups take an entire extra season to prove the limitations everyone else can see, this rebuild could take too long to work.

Anyway, I'll be joining you in hoping for those things. Ultimately my true hope is that the 9ers come together in a way that is greater than the sum of their parts.

That is the biggest flaw with the regime. The good thing is that when they finally acknowledge that a position needs help they address it.

But it was frustrating watching the safety prospects go by our picks when we need at least 1 to compete with ward and colbert.
Coaches and FO people say things all the time that you have to take with a grain of salt.

All these people need to protect their true feelings/intentions. Sometimes what they say is to lead opposing teams away and sometimes it is to motivate a player. It is frustrating fans because we see a need. However, all that is weighed against things we don't see. The Marsh deal was a good example. Shanalynch knew he was not the long-term answer but there weren't very many choices at the time. Now we see their true feelings with the Ford deal and Bosa pick.

Now we have this DB discussion. Again, we don't have all the information. We all know that a good pass rush makes the entire secondary look better. Well, check that box. We all know that it takes good position coaches to make a player better. Woods checks that box. It seems obvious the staff feels the current DBs will meet the challenge with better coaching and a much better pass rush. If they didn't, they would have reacted to it at some point in the draft. Taking a punter instead of a DB suggests they feel the current crop will be much better.
Originally posted by dj43:
Coaches and FO people say things all the time that you have to take with a grain of salt.

All these people need to protect their true feelings/intentions. Sometimes what they say is to lead opposing teams away and sometimes it is to motivate a player. It is frustrating fans because we see a need. However, all that is weighed against things we don't see. The Marsh deal was a good example. Shanalynch knew he was not the long-term answer but there weren't very many choices at the time. Now we see their true feelings with the Ford deal and Bosa pick.

Now we have this DB discussion. Again, we don't have all the information. We all know that a good pass rush makes the entire secondary look better. Well, check that box. We all know that it takes good position coaches to make a player better. Woods checks that box. It seems obvious the staff feels the current DBs will meet the challenge with better coaching and a much better pass rush. If they didn't, they would have reacted to it at some point in the draft. Taking a punter instead of a DB suggests they feel the current crop will be much better.

I totally agree that you need to look more at what they do than what they say to see where their heads are at.

But my concern is that they feel ok about groups that they shouldn't feel ok about. Or think they can skate by on 'good enough' when it isn't good enough and they can't skate by on it.

The pass rush, secondary, and wide receiver groups last year all fall in that category to me.

Just like the secondary and interior OL this year. They obviously feel like they can make a playoff push with these groups as they are. Time will tell, but I worry.
Reaching for Hurd, probably there in Rd 6 I was def thinking S in that pick
Originally posted by gold49digger:
trade up for grant delpit next year problem solved.

Would be expensive to move all the way into the top 10 assuming we make the playoffs or get close
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone