Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 473 users in the forums

What are the players you absolutely DO NOT want?

Browse 49ers books and videos
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
SOS means strength of schedule so I'm not sure why you keep posting about how Florida State isn't a top 25 team...

Florida State wasn't good, but the teams they played against were. The teams Kentucky played against weren't as good as a lot of people think given they're in the SEC.

Florida state got pancaked almost every week. The defense gave up a fifty burger to clemson and three 40 burgers.

Kentucky was a bowl team. They were way better than fsu. allen was a part of kentuckys performance and burns was a part of fsu's performance. Just own it.

Like it when da FACTS come rollin in..lol
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
SOS means strength of schedule so I'm not sure why you keep posting about how Florida State isn't a top 25 team...

Florida State wasn't good, but the teams they played against were. The teams Kentucky played against weren't as good as a lot of people think given they're in the SEC.

Florida state got pancaked almost every week. The defense gave up a fifty burger to clemson and three 40 burgers.

Kentucky was a bowl team. They were way better than fsu. allen was a part of kentuckys performance and burns was a part of fsu's performance. Just own it.

Okay so by your logic a good player cant be on a bad team. Patrick willis on Ole Miss in 2006 was bad, because Ole miss was awful. So Khalil mack on the raiders sucks, right? How about Calvin Johnson on 0-16 Lions.
Rashan Gary. That is all.
Originally posted by gold49digger:
Rashan Gary. That is all.

Yup
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
SOS means strength of schedule so I'm not sure why you keep posting about how Florida State isn't a top 25 team...

Florida State wasn't good, but the teams they played against were. The teams Kentucky played against weren't as good as a lot of people think given they're in the SEC.

Florida state got pancaked almost every week. The defense gave up a fifty burger to clemson and three 40 burgers.

Kentucky was a bowl team. They were way better than fsu. allen was a part of kentuckys performance and burns was a part of fsu's performance. Just own it.

Okay so by your logic a good player cant be on a bad team. Patrick willis on Ole Miss in 2006 was bad, because Ole miss was awful. So Khalil mack on the raiders sucks, right? How about Calvin Johnson on 0-16 Lions.
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by eastcoast49ersfan:
SOS means strength of schedule so I'm not sure why you keep posting about how Florida State isn't a top 25 team...

Florida State wasn't good, but the teams they played against were. The teams Kentucky played against weren't as good as a lot of people think given they're in the SEC.

Florida state got pancaked almost every week. The defense gave up a fifty burger to clemson and three 40 burgers.

Kentucky was a bowl team. They were way better than fsu. allen was a part of kentuckys performance and burns was a part of fsu's performance. Just own it.

Okay so by your logic a good player cant be on a bad team. Patrick willis on Ole Miss in 2006 was bad, because Ole miss was awful. So Khalil mack on the raiders sucks, right? How about Calvin Johnson on 0-16 Lions.

Im not going there. Original discussion had something to do with strength of schedule and how FSU had a much stronger schedule than Kentucky. Which is true. And it showed in the results. None the less Josh Allen was an important part of Kentucky beating 3 top 20 teams. The results could have gone the other way but they didn't. So that's something to think about
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone