-
English
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 41,450
Originally posted by Dillesq:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Supposedly buffalo wants to trade up
They're looking to trade up to 2 or 3, though. We won't have any real trade down scenarios that are likely until the day of given we are so far back. We will have to see how the board plays out. I think at least 4 QBs are drafted in the top 10.
From 21 to 2 or 3? That would be a huge trade. On the board I use, combining both of their 1st rounders would still only get them to around #6 at best. I think Buffalo have too many needs to throw away the draft capital they would need to get to # 2 or #3.
-
Cisco0623
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 14,696
Originally posted by btthepunk:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by birdie2bogey:
Originally posted by tjd808185:
Originally posted by DickNasty:
Believe me, some dumbass qb despaired team will sell it's soal to move up to#10
That's assuming 1 of those qb's is still on the board. With Clv, NYG, NYJ in the top 10 the qb's may fly off the board.
All depends on what happens with Cousins, Keenum, Bridgewater, and now McCarron
And Bradford.
And Foles.
Yeah a lot of free agent quarterbacks this year. Top 10 is a free for all as far i can tell. lol
I could see AZ trading up in front of us for a QB (or with us!) Buffalo becomes viable around pick 8 or later, my guess is they may jump AZ etc in fears they want the same guy.
It is going to be fun. The action may happen in the picks right before ours, but let's see!
-
PopeyeJonesing
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,243
The nice part is that regardless of if teams like the Bills are trying to trade into the 9ers spot or above the 9ers spot in order to take a QB, it's still good for the 9ers (get more picks, or push non-QBs down).
-
Dillesq
- Member
-
- Posts: 1,512
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by Dillesq:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
Supposedly buffalo wants to trade up
They're looking to trade up to 2 or 3, though. We won't have any real trade down scenarios that are likely until the day of given we are so far back. We will have to see how the board plays out. I think at least 4 QBs are drafted in the top 10.
From 21 to 2 or 3? That would be a huge trade. On the board I use, combining both of their 1st rounders would still only get them to around #6 at best. I think Buffalo have too many needs to throw away the draft capital they would need to get to # 2 or #3.
I agree but the rumor is that is where they are attempting to move up to.
-
Cisco0623
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 14,696
Originally posted by PopeyeJonesing:
The nice part is that regardless of if teams like the Bills are trying to trade into the 9ers spot or above the 9ers spot in order to take a QB, it's still good for the 9ers (get more picks, or push non-QBs down).
yup! im ordering mexian and drinking beer draft night with a smile on my face
-
vermonator
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 3,303
This is really a hard draft to read until free agency settles. If Cousins signs with the Vikings or Cards, 4 QBs could be taken above the 9th pick. That makes trading back highly unlikely, unless a player like Chubb or Barkley fall, but why trade when both a need and the BPA fall land in your lap? IMHO, this is a good year to move up, not down. Pin point who you want and go after him, otherwise there's a lot of good players, but not many perennial probowlers, or future HOFers.
-
Heroism
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 26,928
I'm told the receiver-needy San Francisco 49ers are one of several teams high on Ateman.
http://draftanalyst.com/notes-combine-training-settle-looks-cat-quik
Take it with a grain of salt. I never saw anything linking the 49ers to Trent Taylor last year, but Lynch said they loved him so much they almost took him in the third.
[ Edited by Heroism on Feb 18, 2018 at 1:08 PM ]
-
JaggedJ
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 5,870
If the Bills want to move up to where we are then we're probably looking at something along the lines of what the Chiefs gave them to move up to 10 last year.
1st, 3rd, future 1st wasn't it?
Granted different year and supply/demand can change the price, but it's a good starting point.
-
Mertonschickendance
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 4,492
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
If the Bills want to move up to where we are then we're probably looking at something along the lines of what the Chiefs gave them to move up to 10 last year.
1st, 3rd, future 1st wasn't it?
Granted different year and supply/demand can change the price, but it's a good starting point.
We should hard ball if there's a player at 10 that we really like but can't pass the compensation they're willing to give i.e not settle for fair market value since there will be an elite player sitting there at 10.
[ Edited by Mertonschickendance on Feb 18, 2018 at 2:15 PM ]
-
Waterbear
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 18,527
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Originally posted by Heroism:
I'm told the receiver-needy San Francisco 49ers are one of several teams high on Ateman.
http://draftanalyst.com/notes-combine-training-settle-looks-cat-quik
Take it with a grain of salt. I never saw anything linking the 49ers to Trent Taylor last year, but Lynch said they loved him so much they almost took him in the third.
down for Ateman
Will he last until the 3rd? I don't like his value otherwise honestly.
-
evil
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 46,779
Originally posted by JaggedJ:
If the Bills want to move up to where we are then we're probably looking at something along the lines of what the Chiefs gave them to move up to 10 last year.
1st, 3rd, future 1st wasn't it?
Granted different year and supply/demand can change the price, but it's a good starting point.
Chiefs were also moving up from 27, Buffalo would be coming up from 21.
-
NYniner85
- Veteran
-
- Posts: 119,554
Originally posted by Dillesq:
Originally posted by Heroism:
I'm told the receiver-needy San Francisco 49ers are one of several teams high on Ateman.
http://draftanalyst.com/notes-combine-training-settle-looks-cat-quik
Take it with a grain of salt. I never saw anything linking the 49ers to Trent Taylor last year, but Lynch said they loved him so much they almost took him in the third.
Seems really random lol.
Tony Pauline is pretty legit. It makes sense dude is a solid option and red zone threat