Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Paxton Lynch was on a whole different level than Evans was in college. I don't think you can compare the two really off their TD stats either, in college Lynch was the Tigers offense, his supporting cast wasn't anywhere near the caliber VT's is.
But IMO, I think Lynch was drafted due to his height, arm strength and the way he moves inside and outside the pocket. I just don't see the same qualities in Evans. At best I think Evans is a 6th round pick, but there are far better projects to work with than Evans in the draft.
Paxton also had some easy competition, and was in his 2nd year starting in the offense. It was the 4th year Fuentes was there building his offense.
Teams w/ Pass Defense ranking:
Kansas #124
#57
#85
#105
#125
#74
#62 (struggled)
#116
#43 (struggled0
#89
#63 (struggled)
Average: #85
What was Paxton's most significant and impressive win? Against Bowling Green (#57 pass D) and Ole Miss (which had the #125 pass defense). And yet you act like Paxton's performance was awesome and Jerod Evans wasnt?
Competition faced by Evans
Tenn #72 (struggled)
#34
#62
#12
#118
#47
#127
#78 (struggled)
#68 (struggled)
#21
#103
#14 (struggled)
#58
Average: #62
Evans had good comeback wins against Arkansas (#58 pass D) and Notre Dame (#21 pas D).
And as far as the talent Evans had, year sure he had 3 good receivers to throw too. But it was his first year ever playing with them. Also the offensive line was terrible at V-Tech, with the coach constantly shuffling starters. Their only decent starter was Jonathan McLaughlin, who has a terrific 4.82 draft grade by NFL.com.
And Evans also had virtually no rushing game to help him, I think if you factor out when Evans ran the ball, V-Tech had like the 100th ranked rushing offense.
So what your saying is Evans should be drafted in the 1st or 2nd round and he's a much better prospect than Paxton Lynch?
I mean obviously scouts, coaches and GM's base their opinions clearly off stats, correct?
