BPA

Originally posted by kentc1978:

Unless you're the Detroit Lions and pick WR's in the top 10 3 years in a row

Charles Rogers was such a monster in college.

It is only a draft site rating, but Draftek currently has QB Turbisky at # 6 in the first and QB Watson at # 9 in the first round....if the niners FO wants a QB bad enough then picking either one at our draft slot # 2 overall is appropriate, granted it is still a reach, but as some say, a need at QB trumps all other positions regardless of their relative value to other players or draft positions. At pick # 2 they only have worry about only ONE player being gone....IMO they got a whole lot better options than problems to put together a good and meaningful draft. With new blood at GM and such they just might pull off a good draft. Hint: I am trying to be optimistic

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by kentc1978:
Unless you're the Detroit Lions and pick WR's in the top 10 3 years in a row

Charles Rogers was such a monster in college.

He sure was.

So was JJ Stokes - that didn't turn out so well either.

Originally posted by LasVegasWally:

He sure was.

So was JJ Stokes - that didn't turn out so well either.

Yeah but Rogers was lookin like the real deal his rookie year. Then we'll cocaines one hell of a drug

You do not reach for players when you have 1 win in a season. You take the best player available.

Originally posted by Temecula49ersfan:

You do not reach for players when you have 1 win in a season. You take the best player available.

Pretty much. There isn't one position group that is solidified other than MAYBE the secondary. Outside of that, every single unit needs an upgrade